Nanc, Emily Oster, a bureaucrat somewhere, who demanded that antivaxxers be forced to receive the jab, along with others who pushed for mandates has offered a counterargument. She says antivaxxers were right for the wrong reasons and just got lucky that our predictions turned out to be right and hers turned out to be wrong. She says it w…
Nanc, Emily Oster, a bureaucrat somewhere, who demanded that antivaxxers be forced to receive the jab, along with others who pushed for mandates has offered a counterargument. She says antivaxxers were right for the wrong reasons and just got lucky that our predictions turned out to be right and hers turned out to be wrong. She says it was impossible to know that the jabs would cause harm and that people like her who demanded mandates did the right thing and antivaxxers did the wrong thing. She has demanded that herself and others like her be forgiven and given an amnesty. Have you considered that maybe she has a point and that we should submit to her demands?
No. Anyone with half a brain knew covid was a big nothing for most, we had therapeutics that worked, and that hospitals and stupid protocols were doing most of the killing by April of 2020. If she'd bothered to follow Karen Kingston, ex Pfizer CEO Yeadon, Sukrit Bhakti, Dr Zelenko ( who had 700 cures already by then) and other experts being viciously censored by people like her, she'd know the mRNA tech was dangerous and unneeded.
These folks are guilty of negligent homicide at best.
I fully agree with you Jimy 100%. I'm not sure Nanc does. Maybe it wasn't Nanc but I saw a comment somewhere which I thought might have been from Nanc and which has given me the impression that Nanc is a bit lenient on those like Oster who pushed he jabs and may be part of that group who think the jabs are not so bad and that those who forced them on others should be given a pass.
Naturally, the system is trying to save itself. Awe shucks, we din know better. Fergive us? Were all in this together? Remember? That means no one hangs.
Nanc, Emily Oster, a bureaucrat somewhere, who demanded that antivaxxers be forced to receive the jab, along with others who pushed for mandates has offered a counterargument. She says antivaxxers were right for the wrong reasons and just got lucky that our predictions turned out to be right and hers turned out to be wrong. She says it was impossible to know that the jabs would cause harm and that people like her who demanded mandates did the right thing and antivaxxers did the wrong thing. She has demanded that herself and others like her be forgiven and given an amnesty. Have you considered that maybe she has a point and that we should submit to her demands?
No. Anyone with half a brain knew covid was a big nothing for most, we had therapeutics that worked, and that hospitals and stupid protocols were doing most of the killing by April of 2020. If she'd bothered to follow Karen Kingston, ex Pfizer CEO Yeadon, Sukrit Bhakti, Dr Zelenko ( who had 700 cures already by then) and other experts being viciously censored by people like her, she'd know the mRNA tech was dangerous and unneeded.
These folks are guilty of negligent homicide at best.
I fully agree with you Jimy 100%. I'm not sure Nanc does. Maybe it wasn't Nanc but I saw a comment somewhere which I thought might have been from Nanc and which has given me the impression that Nanc is a bit lenient on those like Oster who pushed he jabs and may be part of that group who think the jabs are not so bad and that those who forced them on others should be given a pass.
Naturally, the system is trying to save itself. Awe shucks, we din know better. Fergive us? Were all in this together? Remember? That means no one hangs.