Why did Dagan manipulate 'vaccinated' status versus 'unvaccinated' the way it did, if ONLY to place lack of efficacy, harms, deaths etc. in UNVACCINATED bucket when they were infact 'VACCINATED'
Why did Dagan manipulate 'vaccinated' status versus 'unvaccinated' the way it did, if ONLY to place lack of efficacy, harms, deaths etc. in UNVACCINATED bucket when they were infact 'VACCINATED'
days 14 through 20 after first dose of vaccine, days 21 through 27 after first dose (administration of second dose was scheduled to occur on day 21 after the first dose), day 7 after the second dose
I think one of the best contributions you could make, is to create a couple of videos walking Jo American through the fraud of the Dagan study and perhaps a couple other of the studies that were widely relied upon. (Create it so that someone with junior high math and reading comprehension could understand) Perhaps you might inspire a few more 18 yo investigative journalists (like at Stanford) to begin to challenge their professors.
The first time I went through the Dagan study I was flabbergasted. Table S6 shows this was the more expensive cold medicine ever created without regard to safety.
They did that stupid design to help hide the results. The biggest clue was to see early on that they neglected the deaths on day 1 and the first 14 days, etc. But JAMA was happy to publish that crap.
Why did Dagan et al. manipulate "vaccinated" status? Because that's how evidence-based medicine is done. Why did JAMA publish a crap paper that should be retracted? For the same reason. Plus, both the researchers and the editorial board of JAMA might have had a cash incentive. Who knows? If they did, they won't be saying. This is how science and evidence-based medicine works.
I think one of the best contributions you could make, is to create a couple of videos walking Jo American through the fraud of the Dagan study and perhaps a couple other of the studies that were widely relied upon. (Create it so that someone with junior high math and reading comprehension could understand) Perhaps you might inspire a few more 18 yo investigative journalists (like at Stanford) to begin to challenge their professors.
The first time I went through the Dagan study I was flabbergasted. Table S6 shows this was the more expensive cold medicine ever created without regard to safety.
They did that stupid design to help hide the results. The biggest clue was to see early on that they neglected the deaths on day 1 and the first 14 days, etc. But JAMA was happy to publish that crap.
Hell Dr. Alexander, the entire US was made to do this, for exactly that reason.
Read somewhere hospitals were documenting 'vaccinated' as 'unvaccinated' on medical reports or death certificates.
Who paid for the study? That’s the most important question.
Why did Dagan et al. manipulate "vaccinated" status? Because that's how evidence-based medicine is done. Why did JAMA publish a crap paper that should be retracted? For the same reason. Plus, both the researchers and the editorial board of JAMA might have had a cash incentive. Who knows? If they did, they won't be saying. This is how science and evidence-based medicine works.
The illusion of evidence based medicine
BMJ 2022; 376 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.o702 (Published 16 March 2022)
https://www.bmj.com/content/376/bmj.o702
Bingo! That’s it in a nutshell and always has been. Thanks for your great comment.
It's OBVIOUS why they were intentionally classifying vaccinated people as unvaccinated.
Some articles that investigate this fraud of miscategorisation.
The very best of Cheap Trick..... How widespread is the (mal)practice of miscategorising vaccination status? -> https://wherearethenumbers.substack.com/p/the-very-best-of-cheap-trick
The Bias that Creates the Illusion of an Effective Covid Vaccine -> https://brownstone.org/articles/bias-creates-illusion-of-effective-covid-vaccine/
Thank you!