27 Comments

We need to understand the motivation for ignoring the role the immune plays in protecting the body from pathogens and how to boost the immune system to be more vibrant. Also, the motivation to ignore simple treatment options needs to be explored. Both were key to deep sixing the Covid con in short order and not three years of gas lighting! We continue down the wrong path in medicine and Moderna is up front and center on their website extolling the nano drug injections as having great potential. For who? Stockholders or the patient?

Expand full comment

.

Dear Heavily Vaccinated,

Safe And Effective?

It Doesn’t Even Protect Your Ego.

And That’s Just Killing You.

Isn’t It?

.

Expand full comment

The arrival of the virulent variant predicted by GVB, and caused by the mass vaccination (with non-sterilizing 'vaccines'), will be declared as yet another 'new variant' resulting from the ongoing evolutionary process of the virus.

There will be zero acknowledgement of the role 'mass vaccination' played in creating this virulent strain. There will be zero blame directed at the corrupt, insidious, and incompetent cretins responsible for this likely tragedy.

Worse, these same corrupt, insidious, and incompetent cretins will be the 'experts' relied upon to counter the resurgent pandemic.

Expand full comment

First, thank you Dr. Alexander for passing along Dr. Rennebohm's outstanding summation of Dr. Vanden Bossche's writings. I will posit that one reason most "doctors" disagree with Dr. Vanden Bossche is because of the extremely comprehensive, detailed knowledgeability evident in his writings. Comprehension of his argumentation requires time and thinking they are unwilling to exert. Easier to parrot the party line. Also, an important component of the scientific method, is logical correct reasoning. Dr.Vanden Bossche's deductive reasoning combined with his knowledgeability, leaves them in the dust.

Expand full comment

I have two BIG problems with this. To make progress we MUST call it the way it is. You’re using THEIR terminology which is wrong.

It’s NOT A VACCINE, it’s a TRANSFECTION.

It’s NOT A PANDEMIC, it’s a PSYCHOLOGICAL OPERATION fueled by manipulated PCR testing. Furthermore, this thing is done. Where are the more virulent strains?

Expand full comment

Simply put ,the powers that be /cabal /pharma ,call it what you will ,knew very well that Geert was right on his early pronouncements but for the investors into mRNA financial bonanza it would have meant a full stop . And that my friends is the bottom line.

Expand full comment

Physicians do not want to understand GVB. They are too concerned with keeping their jobs (instead of following the Hippocratic Oath) and maximizing their income (earning Big Pharma bribes).

Expand full comment

I’m a laymen unable to decipher errors/accuracies either way.

“Why ADE Hasn't Been a Problem With COVID Vaccines

— Even with new variants, it's unlikely antibody-dependent enhancement will be an issue”

https://www.medpagetoday.com/special-reports/exclusives/91648

“Do COVID-19 Vaccines Cause Antibody-dependent Enhancement (ADE)?” Dr. Paul Offit explains:

Paul Offit, MD: Hi, my name is Paul Offit from the Vaccine Education Center. One issue that's come up regarding the safety of coronavirus vaccines is: Could they cause something called antibody-dependent enhancement? Now, this is something that's been seen with a virus called dengue virus, which is actually a very common virus in this world, although not common really in the continental United States. There are four different types of dengue virus. When you're infected with one type of dengue virus and you recover, and then you're infected with a second type of dengue virus, sometimes what happens is people, because they've developed an antibody response to that first and really different type of dengue virus, when they're then exposed to a second type of dengue virus, actually have much worse disease than if they'd never been infected with any type of dengue before.

So people are worried that maybe with this virus, this SARS-CoV-2 virus, that that could also be true here, because there was a suspicion from some of the animal model studies that were done with SARS-CoV-1 virus, which was a virus that sort of came up in 2002 but then in a couple of years was gone, that that also might be true here. But there are a number of reasons why it's unlikely to happen, very unlikely to happen.

First of all is if you're infected with human coronavirus, and there are four different types of human coronavirus, and then you're infected with a second different type of human coronavirus, you don't have that phenomenon of so-called antibody-dependent enhancement, where you have a much worse second infection than first infection.

Secondly, when you look at people, and these were studies done in the early 1990s, that were experimentally challenged with human coronavirus and then challenged again with human coronavirus, sort of under sort of the experimental conditions, also, you never saw antibody-dependent enhancement.

Third, if you look at animals who are infected with SARS-CoV-2 virus, experimental animals, and then experimentally infected again with SARS-CoV-2 virus, there's not antibody-dependent enhancement. And similarly, if you look at animals that are given a SARS-CoV-2 vaccine and then challenged with the natural virus, the SARS-CoV-2 virus, they too don't develop antibody-dependent enhancement.

And then lastly, and finally, with people who are infected with SARS-CoV-2, when they are given antibodies, so-called convalescent plasma directed against SARS-CoV-2, they too don't develop antibody-dependent enhancement.

So, I think the concerns that were raised by what happened with SARS-1 are understandable, but we now have five separate pieces of evidence that suggest that that is not going to be a problem with this virus or with this vaccine associated with this virus.

Thank you.

Expand full comment

This is what we should really be talking about. They caused epidemic after epidemic!!!

Nobody wants to hear it, not even the vaccine critics.

https://q3deathwave.pervaers.com/video/3a;78-95;Cases_Accu_PerUninfected_Perc;D1_18-64_Accu_Perc;20sec.mp4

Expand full comment

It's like this.

There was an apparent great depression.

The govt kept telling everyone they needed to take the govt bailout blindly and not read the fine-print, even though there was none.

I, along with tens of millions of others, smelt a rat and decided the govt bailout was a ruse for final insolvency and dismissed the alleged altruistic govt offer.

Friends, colleagues, and total strangers said "take the fucking bailout, idiot".

Still I resisted. I lost many friends and colleagues.

My business suffered but pulled through.

Other businesses who took the govt bailout also pulled through.

Some who took the bailout didn't.

Then someone, on my side of the fence kept telling me, after three years of business hell, that the next depression, which will apparently make the first one look like child's play (which wasnt really one in the first place in my view) is around the corner, and it will be economic hell to pay.

So, the question is, why do I even have to listen to this new doomsday prophet, when in my view, there was no doomsday in the first place, and all his mumbo jumbo writing really means nothing to me because I do not have the formal education or training to understand 99% of it.

Thanks pal, but no thanks, I'll row my own bloody boat.

Things seem much better already.

Expand full comment

Thanks - good article. I found the numbers in this post (by Andreas Oehler) surprising and thought of Dr. Vanden Bossche right away. https://live2fightanotherday.substack.com/p/toronto-star-inadvertently-admits?

Expand full comment

Wow, what an excellent analysis and summary of Dr. VB's book. I am reading the book and it is very difficult for the layman. This summary should be sent out far and wide.

Expand full comment

Gorski has written at least one article ridiculing and supposedly debunking him. He's a threat to Pharma so now they are paying off their bots and trolls to sew division by attacking him from the left, using the discredited pseudoscience and degenerative research paradigm of "terrain theory." When anomalies in a theory or research paradigm or program accumulate and the program cannot digest the anomalies, it is degenerative. A superior paradigm has to replace it. That is why we have germ theory, not terrain theory. Terrain theory is for the ouiji boards, crystal healing, Martian chi beams people, so called "schizotypals" who proliferate on these sites along with paranoids and compulsives like JonesySmart and others, truly evil people. All this aids Pharma. Vanden Bossche is a sane, rational thinker who has proposed a theory that is gaining sound evidentiary support. But it's under sustained attack by Professor Gorski, the rabid pro-vax oncologist and fact checker, in alliance with the terrain theory trolls, bots and nut jobs.

Expand full comment

I asked about Dr. Bossche in a Dr. Mobeen discord and a mod deleted my questions and was later DM’d that Mobeen has said before he doesn’t agree with ADE / Bossche 🤷‍♂️

Expand full comment

I personally never understood where Mobeen was coming from. He loved the vaccine, he wanted everybody to take, he didn't like it, he hated it. Who knows? He's a clinician, not a vaccinologist, just because he doesn't agree with him he deletes your question? There is cancelling people out, wherever you go.

Expand full comment

Dr Mobeen was initially for the vaccination . He got the series himself . He says he is not pro or anti vax but to many of his viewers he certainly seemed to promote it more than question it’s safety.

Expand full comment

Not he, a mod.

Expand full comment

It's because Dr. Vanden Bossche is clinging to the failed virus theory to explain it all - SOVI - "Statement On Virus Isolation" - Dr. Andrew Kaufman - https://andrewkaufmanmd.com/sovi/

Expand full comment

I believe all vaccines are a waste of time and do serious damage to the naturalness of the body. The question about getting any vaccination or mRNA substance is not a consideration at all. If I were to get sick and die from a nasty virus or other ghoulish thing, you can never prove that any vaccine or injection would have caused different results or prevented the illness. There is no certainty that getting any vaccination/injection will ever protect you from anything. Blind trust never ensures health.

It is all the conjecture of probabilities and nothing is ever 100%. I'll bet on my immune system over drugs every time, even if I get cancer. Big pharma's drug empire was not created to promote health and wellness, but to ensure that all who participate, outside of the helplessly captured patient, will reap enormous financial rewards. And the satisfaction that the average patient will have been monetarily raped to death, literally.

Expand full comment