Will the 'real' Slim Shady please stand up, please stand up! Will the 'real' inventor of the mRNA technology or any aspect that went into the COVID mRNA gene injection platform please stand up?
Will the 'real' Slim Shady please stand up, please stand up! Will the 'real' inventor of the mRNA technology or any aspect that went into the COVID mRNA gene injection platform please stand up?
I have given this careful thought & it cannot be Dr. Robert Malone. Why? Because this mRNA technology gene injection LNP platform is harmful and kills & has killed adults & children! Devastating!
My dad, who has the same name as me, used to work at Vical and Inovio. He worked with Dr. Malone, and had to get his permission to use some of Dr. Malone's patents. I think Dr. Malone is the real inventor of the mRNA technology, and that the mRNA technology can potentially, in theory, be used to make worthwhile products, Similar to how Kary Mullis invented the PCR machine, but that technology was later abused to get many false-positive COVID results, the mRNA technology that Dr. Malone created has also been abused to create the COVID vaccines.
From the substack: "So, what’s been shown in this new paper by Zhang et al, is that a lab clone of the SARS-CoV-2 virus, when present in very high levels, does turn on LINE-1, which means it also turns on the LINE-1 reverse transcriptase enzyme, which it then makes use of to reverse transcribe itself into our DNA.
But even worse: genome sequencing found the viral genetic code transcribed into our DNA not only in cells where LINE-1 was actively turned on, or overexpressed above baseline, but even in cells where it was not. "
From what I believe, Dr. Malone invented at least part of the technology. Others build on and modify inventions to make new ones, new patents. I'm not a virologist, and I haven't gone down the rabbit hole of what patents say what. I believe the wheels started coming off the proverbial cart with the addition of pseudouridine over uridine, to make the product less able to be broken down, more durable. Just a general feeling thiugh without doing a deep dive into the documents and data.
I've had a wonderful life. I actually worked in some of the labs at University of North Carolina where some of this work was done. I've been to the lectures, seminars, and presentations in the late 1990's, early 2000's, where gene therapies were dreamed about, how genes could be inserted into cells, if not the DNA genome, with the hope of curing genetic diseases, like cystic fibrosis, and others. It seemed like nothing worked, the breakthrough remained out of reach. Often, it seemed like if there was temporary, transient success, soon immunity worked against us, as cells, airways just became inflamed, without more than brief benefit. Gene therapies seemed like a dead end. Although peripheral to it, I personally never worked in the gene therapy field, but in related fields. I left research in about 2008, when the recession hit, grant money dried up, and I had to go clinical full time.
Prior to that though, I had previously worked in industrial research, so I also know the environment there. In academics, it's publish or die. In industry, it's often more lucrative to keep trade secrets. Patents and publications are the LAST resort, a last chance to protect an invention that otherwise a competitor may copy. Further, "improve" an invention, and another patent might be applied for. The patent actually has little value unless it's proven (defended) in court legally, often among similar competing patents, so that's ultimately how claim to an invention is proven. Was "this" the basis of the invention or did this make a substantial enough improvement over prior technology? Those are the questions argued.
I even remember sitting next to a colleague at a microscope, as he exclaimed, "There is NO question! Our competitor copied our patented design!". I asked if we would then sue in court? I was told, "No, we want them to continue to use that design, because we know it doesn't work!".
So, who invented what is not a question that I worry about. The question I worry about is what trade secrets are being hidden, what is not being disclosed. That's the only question worth being asked at this point, in my humble opinion.
Who gives a damn about Robert Malone, suing other freedom fighters for 25 million?
The only thing I care about right NOW…where is our missing past president on all the fraud, death and injuries by all the bioterrorism put out by our military/DOD/Pentagon?
If I was at Trump’s home last week this Mother Lion would have asked Trump…
Where the hell have you been after 21/2 years of serious evidence presented that humanity has been harmed and murdered thanks to this BIOTERRORISM WAR…and will continue until
we have serious leadership???
What should serious leadership look like today?
STOP ALL MANDATES, ‘VACCINES’ to stop this bioterrorism war! Secondly….accountability for this global criminal cartel!
Where is Trump?
I give him until this Friday as he has enough evidence to show the people the Leadership we need!
Watching a video of him the other day he said he gave up on it after some years because he couldn't make it work. I would say the people that need to be held accountable are the ones that modified it with the pseudouridine and other things that shouldn't be injected into people.
Come on Paul. He's the inventor of the technology, not the LNP's they used to transport the spike. But you already know this. Just stop already. Go outside and get some exercise, sunshine, clear your head. This isn't helping our cause and it's not healthy to continue this path.
I am not a medical professional. However I followed Dr Malone, Dr David Martin, Dr Ardis and Dr Montagnier from the very beginning, for very personal reasons. I started questioning the Pandemic, as I was reading information from US and China in parallel. Dr Malone was probably the very first one raising concerns and explaining that the technology was created for lab studies in order to treat or prevent cancer but did not work and all experimental animals died. He also talked about potential consequences.
From invention of mRNA to production, implementation, suspicious contracts, suspicious approvals, data hiding and abusive mandates, seems to be a money making plan behind at least. Actually explained so well by Dr Martin in his recent interview in “vaccine revealed 2023” ep 1.
“ pan-influenza or pan-coronavirus vaccine. A key driver is the media, and the economics follow the hype. We need to use that hype to our advantage to get to the real issues. Investors will respond if they see profit at the end of process, Daszak stated.”
The developmrent of mRNA is a collaborative effort . One scientists discoveries are built upon by the next researcher and so on. The book Crispr lays it out! I believe Malone thinks that there is a role for mRNA if properly managed and is side stepping some of the narrative.
I agree, Dr. Alexander -- it's way past time to stop pretending a little more testing can fix what is wrong with the extremely toxic, experimental Covid-19 injectables. They are neither "safe" nor "effective." Their supposed mode of operation, injecting people with mRNA that codes for the most pathogenic part of the virus in order to turn the human body into a spike-producing factory, is insane and stupid. It makes sense only if the purpose is to cause harm.
You need to separate who did the initial development, including the patents, and who put together the actual kill shot from that original research. Malone himself talks about the problems he and team encountered using pseudouridine to protect the RNA package from the bodies immune system. Not enough PU and there was not enough activation. Enough PU and it impacted the bodies immune system negatively. This is at least part of the reason he and his team stopped development.
My dad, who has the same name as me, used to work at Vical and Inovio. He worked with Dr. Malone, and had to get his permission to use some of Dr. Malone's patents. I think Dr. Malone is the real inventor of the mRNA technology, and that the mRNA technology can potentially, in theory, be used to make worthwhile products, Similar to how Kary Mullis invented the PCR machine, but that technology was later abused to get many false-positive COVID results, the mRNA technology that Dr. Malone created has also been abused to create the COVID vaccines.
I am cautious about Malone personally. He may be controlled ops to give the 'anti-vax' side a hero.
He cracks jokes that are similar to the insider's propaganda, in part what makes me suspicious. May be a real coincidence.
On the 3rd last paragraph where Dr. Alexander brings up the possibility of reverse transcription back into human DNA due to the covid-19 vaccines:
I just saw this substack about a recent journal article that covers that issue: https://syedhaider.substack.com/p/more-proof-mrna-shots-edit-human
It discusses a new journal article that was just published February 13, 2023:
https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2023.02.10.527906v1.full
It is very concerning.
From the substack: "So, what’s been shown in this new paper by Zhang et al, is that a lab clone of the SARS-CoV-2 virus, when present in very high levels, does turn on LINE-1, which means it also turns on the LINE-1 reverse transcriptase enzyme, which it then makes use of to reverse transcribe itself into our DNA.
But even worse: genome sequencing found the viral genetic code transcribed into our DNA not only in cells where LINE-1 was actively turned on, or overexpressed above baseline, but even in cells where it was not. "
I don't know.
From what I believe, Dr. Malone invented at least part of the technology. Others build on and modify inventions to make new ones, new patents. I'm not a virologist, and I haven't gone down the rabbit hole of what patents say what. I believe the wheels started coming off the proverbial cart with the addition of pseudouridine over uridine, to make the product less able to be broken down, more durable. Just a general feeling thiugh without doing a deep dive into the documents and data.
I've had a wonderful life. I actually worked in some of the labs at University of North Carolina where some of this work was done. I've been to the lectures, seminars, and presentations in the late 1990's, early 2000's, where gene therapies were dreamed about, how genes could be inserted into cells, if not the DNA genome, with the hope of curing genetic diseases, like cystic fibrosis, and others. It seemed like nothing worked, the breakthrough remained out of reach. Often, it seemed like if there was temporary, transient success, soon immunity worked against us, as cells, airways just became inflamed, without more than brief benefit. Gene therapies seemed like a dead end. Although peripheral to it, I personally never worked in the gene therapy field, but in related fields. I left research in about 2008, when the recession hit, grant money dried up, and I had to go clinical full time.
Prior to that though, I had previously worked in industrial research, so I also know the environment there. In academics, it's publish or die. In industry, it's often more lucrative to keep trade secrets. Patents and publications are the LAST resort, a last chance to protect an invention that otherwise a competitor may copy. Further, "improve" an invention, and another patent might be applied for. The patent actually has little value unless it's proven (defended) in court legally, often among similar competing patents, so that's ultimately how claim to an invention is proven. Was "this" the basis of the invention or did this make a substantial enough improvement over prior technology? Those are the questions argued.
I even remember sitting next to a colleague at a microscope, as he exclaimed, "There is NO question! Our competitor copied our patented design!". I asked if we would then sue in court? I was told, "No, we want them to continue to use that design, because we know it doesn't work!".
So, who invented what is not a question that I worry about. The question I worry about is what trade secrets are being hidden, what is not being disclosed. That's the only question worth being asked at this point, in my humble opinion.
Whoever came up with the psuedouridine is culpable
Anyone truly concerned about their reputation can sue anyone who defames them.
For $1.00.
The person we are discussing here, and his wife are suing at least 3 people for $25,000,000.
I had to look up how many zeros are in 25,000,000.
People who sue others for this kind of money are off my list to ever listen to or trust.
Malone is not what he appears to be. A good con-man knows the most effective lies are wrapped in as much truth as possible.
Who gives a damn about Robert Malone, suing other freedom fighters for 25 million?
The only thing I care about right NOW…where is our missing past president on all the fraud, death and injuries by all the bioterrorism put out by our military/DOD/Pentagon?
If I was at Trump’s home last week this Mother Lion would have asked Trump…
Where the hell have you been after 21/2 years of serious evidence presented that humanity has been harmed and murdered thanks to this BIOTERRORISM WAR…and will continue until
we have serious leadership???
What should serious leadership look like today?
STOP ALL MANDATES, ‘VACCINES’ to stop this bioterrorism war! Secondly….accountability for this global criminal cartel!
Where is Trump?
I give him until this Friday as he has enough evidence to show the people the Leadership we need!
Watching a video of him the other day he said he gave up on it after some years because he couldn't make it work. I would say the people that need to be held accountable are the ones that modified it with the pseudouridine and other things that shouldn't be injected into people.
Come on Paul. He's the inventor of the technology, not the LNP's they used to transport the spike. But you already know this. Just stop already. Go outside and get some exercise, sunshine, clear your head. This isn't helping our cause and it's not healthy to continue this path.
I am not a medical professional. However I followed Dr Malone, Dr David Martin, Dr Ardis and Dr Montagnier from the very beginning, for very personal reasons. I started questioning the Pandemic, as I was reading information from US and China in parallel. Dr Malone was probably the very first one raising concerns and explaining that the technology was created for lab studies in order to treat or prevent cancer but did not work and all experimental animals died. He also talked about potential consequences.
From invention of mRNA to production, implementation, suspicious contracts, suspicious approvals, data hiding and abusive mandates, seems to be a money making plan behind at least. Actually explained so well by Dr Martin in his recent interview in “vaccine revealed 2023” ep 1.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nim.nih.gov/26913314/ ( if they didn’t deleted it)
“ pan-influenza or pan-coronavirus vaccine. A key driver is the media, and the economics follow the hype. We need to use that hype to our advantage to get to the real issues. Investors will respond if they see profit at the end of process, Daszak stated.”
The developmrent of mRNA is a collaborative effort . One scientists discoveries are built upon by the next researcher and so on. The book Crispr lays it out! I believe Malone thinks that there is a role for mRNA if properly managed and is side stepping some of the narrative.
How well do you know Dr. Robert Malone? I get the sense he’s a wolf in sheep’s clothing… CIA
I agree, Dr. Alexander -- it's way past time to stop pretending a little more testing can fix what is wrong with the extremely toxic, experimental Covid-19 injectables. They are neither "safe" nor "effective." Their supposed mode of operation, injecting people with mRNA that codes for the most pathogenic part of the virus in order to turn the human body into a spike-producing factory, is insane and stupid. It makes sense only if the purpose is to cause harm.
You need to separate who did the initial development, including the patents, and who put together the actual kill shot from that original research. Malone himself talks about the problems he and team encountered using pseudouridine to protect the RNA package from the bodies immune system. Not enough PU and there was not enough activation. Enough PU and it impacted the bodies immune system negatively. This is at least part of the reason he and his team stopped development.
What an intelligent provocation! Bravo!