89 Comments

My dad, who has the same name as me, used to work at Vical and Inovio. He worked with Dr. Malone, and had to get his permission to use some of Dr. Malone's patents. I think Dr. Malone is the real inventor of the mRNA technology, and that the mRNA technology can potentially, in theory, be used to make worthwhile products, Similar to how Kary Mullis invented the PCR machine, but that technology was later abused to get many false-positive COVID results, the mRNA technology that Dr. Malone created has also been abused to create the COVID vaccines.

Expand full comment

You are correct. I don’t know why my Caribbean country man (Trinidad) - Dr Paul Alexander, pretends not to understand. Dr Malone has previously that technology is being misused.

Expand full comment

I am cautious about Malone personally. He may be controlled ops to give the 'anti-vax' side a hero.

He cracks jokes that are similar to the insider's propaganda, in part what makes me suspicious. May be a real coincidence.

Expand full comment

Yeah it's a coincidence. Sometimes people read too much into things. Malone had two shots and was injured, same as Kirsch. He has patents on some of the original technology. He learnt the hard way that the mRNA tech is still immature.. He's just a brilliant scientist, like Oppenheimer.. Oppenheimer didn't drop the bomb. Just don't fuck with Malone. He thinks the Breggins libelled him and they're learning they fucked with the wrong guy.

Expand full comment

The last part is a tell too, he acts like the insiders do. That is all. I practice skepsis. ;-)

Expand full comment

The lawsuit makes no sense!

Expand full comment

It makes perfect sense. If Malone is full of shit then it will backfire by giving the Breggins a forum to throw more mud and smear Malone further. That is what happened to Oscar Wilde when he sued for being called a sodomite. Unfortunately for Wilde, he was and the Lawsuit was the beginning of the end for him. On the other hand, if it is the Breggins who are full of shit, they're fucked. Malone will take them to the cleaners and nobody will ever dare smear him again. Malone has an IQ that is obviously well above the 99th percentile and would know of what happened to Wilde. Yet he's going ahead anyway. He has a deep sense of injustice and believes that to relieve it and to heal, he needs to see to it that the Breggins get fucked over. Personally I'd prefer he forgave them and let bygones be bygones. But that ain't gonna happen!

Expand full comment

Sad commentary.! We need a united front to stop the great harm that is coming down the road!

Expand full comment

The Breggins should make a public apology and pledge not to smear him again. There is at least a faint chance that could change his mind and it could also lessen the quantum of damages awarded against them when they lose.

Expand full comment

I haven’t got a clue what they said that is so damning!

Expand full comment

Science is about questioning things. Suing over being questioned suggests you have something to hide and don'twant to answer or respond. Suing an over 80 year old health activist is just wrong and kind of crazy imo. Breggins is not in the wrong, it seems to me. Malone is being a petty rich guy and nothing can make that seem okay.

Expand full comment

Yeah I like the Breggins. I see Malone as not being open. Why is he suing? He doesn’t want to be associated with the killer stuff I guess

Expand full comment

And on this note, I will never understand why Dr Malone, Physician, Scientist thought that the shots were a good idea especially after he stated he had already had Covid. I have heard him speak on multiple occasions. Because he wanted to travel abroad? Because he needed that shot card?

While many here including myself would never inject ourselves with this mRNA technology especially after recovering from Covid. I don’t possess near the education he does, nor do many others but we said no. What is it that drove each of us to that decision? I have lots of questions. Was he manipulated and lied to as well when the mRNA shots were being developed? I know this much, he knows ‘where a lot of the bodies are buried’ in this whole scenario.

Expand full comment

He solidified my belief that the vax was harmful. If he was controlled op he was completely ineffective lol He has redpilled many. He needs to be fired as Control agent.

Expand full comment

Well said.

Expand full comment

Controlled ops can become the trusted voice who is keeping the conversation focused on somethings and away from other topics like self care solutions.

So they seem like trusted alternative advocates but are really monopolizing the conversation and keeping it away from undesired topics.

Expand full comment

LOL

Expand full comment

My thoughts exactly…I’m an Empath and he is NOT fooling us.

Expand full comment

I was told that by someone credible a long time ago, and I tend to believe it based on long observation..

Expand full comment

On the 3rd last paragraph where Dr. Alexander brings up the possibility of reverse transcription back into human DNA due to the covid-19 vaccines:

I just saw this substack about a recent journal article that covers that issue: https://syedhaider.substack.com/p/more-proof-mrna-shots-edit-human

It discusses a new journal article that was just published February 13, 2023:

https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2023.02.10.527906v1.full

It is very concerning.

From the substack: "So, what’s been shown in this new paper by Zhang et al, is that a lab clone of the SARS-CoV-2 virus, when present in very high levels, does turn on LINE-1, which means it also turns on the LINE-1 reverse transcriptase enzyme, which it then makes use of to reverse transcribe itself into our DNA.

But even worse: genome sequencing found the viral genetic code transcribed into our DNA not only in cells where LINE-1 was actively turned on, or overexpressed above baseline, but even in cells where it was not. "

Expand full comment

As it was designed to do. It will modify your genome, and you will pass that on to the childers (if you can have any that is) and those females born may have premature ovarian failure or no live births (mutations in the children result in premature miscarriages eg non viable pregnancy). Kaput there goes the population...Also those who are born may down regulate the pathway for cellular / DNA repairs. Thus prone to being sickly and tumor filled... a very very cruel genetic bomb AND one that would take about 10,000 years of breeding to 'clean' out of the genome, or maybe you'd have to all undergo Crisper to get a clean genome for an embryo.. no more 'natural' conception from sex any more I guess...

Expand full comment

I don't know.

From what I believe, Dr. Malone invented at least part of the technology. Others build on and modify inventions to make new ones, new patents. I'm not a virologist, and I haven't gone down the rabbit hole of what patents say what. I believe the wheels started coming off the proverbial cart with the addition of pseudouridine over uridine, to make the product less able to be broken down, more durable. Just a general feeling thiugh without doing a deep dive into the documents and data.

I've had a wonderful life. I actually worked in some of the labs at University of North Carolina where some of this work was done. I've been to the lectures, seminars, and presentations in the late 1990's, early 2000's, where gene therapies were dreamed about, how genes could be inserted into cells, if not the DNA genome, with the hope of curing genetic diseases, like cystic fibrosis, and others. It seemed like nothing worked, the breakthrough remained out of reach. Often, it seemed like if there was temporary, transient success, soon immunity worked against us, as cells, airways just became inflamed, without more than brief benefit. Gene therapies seemed like a dead end. Although peripheral to it, I personally never worked in the gene therapy field, but in related fields. I left research in about 2008, when the recession hit, grant money dried up, and I had to go clinical full time.

Prior to that though, I had previously worked in industrial research, so I also know the environment there. In academics, it's publish or die. In industry, it's often more lucrative to keep trade secrets. Patents and publications are the LAST resort, a last chance to protect an invention that otherwise a competitor may copy. Further, "improve" an invention, and another patent might be applied for. The patent actually has little value unless it's proven (defended) in court legally, often among similar competing patents, so that's ultimately how claim to an invention is proven. Was "this" the basis of the invention or did this make a substantial enough improvement over prior technology? Those are the questions argued.

I even remember sitting next to a colleague at a microscope, as he exclaimed, "There is NO question! Our competitor copied our patented design!". I asked if we would then sue in court? I was told, "No, we want them to continue to use that design, because we know it doesn't work!".

So, who invented what is not a question that I worry about. The question I worry about is what trade secrets are being hidden, what is not being disclosed. That's the only question worth being asked at this point, in my humble opinion.

Expand full comment

Yes, precisely. Various scientists (preferably) in distant and unconnected locations develop different parts of a patent, but not the whole thing. They are not allowed. Each patent is closely supervised by Jesuits who tweak them and use them for their nefarious purposes. The developers do not see the whole picture (while the Jesuits do) so they can’t remedy anything that goes against their wishes. It’s out of their scope of influence.

It is done that way on purpose. Malone did his part, and it got hijacked. Who is Fauci? A Jesuit and proud of it.

Expand full comment

Thank you for that explanation and background which exposes an angle I’ve not read anywhere else.

Expand full comment

Through marriage, ex in laws, I learned that the atom bomb was also made that way. Individual scientists did not necessarily know what they were working on.

Expand full comment

Need to know I guess

Expand full comment

Jennifer, you noted that Malone cracks jokes that are similar to the insider's propaganda,. Can you give an example? He also cracks jokes that are not similar. At least he cracks jokes. What's a joke Fauci's cracked? There wouldn't be too many of them. Hitler tended not to crack jokes either. Fauci and Hitler and a lot of others have the same disorder. They lack the mirror neurons for humor. They also lack empathy. Malone has empathy. He's just paranoid. Paranoid people are easily slighted. They counter-attack and pre-emptively attack. They hold grudges. That doesn't make them controlled opposition. It makes them dangerous. It's a really, really bad idea to fuck with them. They don't forget. They don't forgive, and they settle scores. They are hypersensitive to perceived defamation. Breggins, as a psychiatrist, should have known all this. We're lucky Malone is on our side.

Expand full comment

Narcissist to avoid in other words.

It seemed targeted rather than just joking, and in time sequence with other takedowns. Cancel culture is organized, not something the public control.

Expand full comment

Not necessarily a narcissist. It's possible. They are hypersensitive too. They don't have any empathy. I think he does but I could be wrong.

Expand full comment

I have no idea. Peace to all.

Expand full comment

Whoever came up with the psuedouridine is culpable

Expand full comment

The female that the MEDIA was trying to say Malone stole the invention of MRNA from. She really only wanted credit for the psuedouridine. I agree with you. Unfortunately, I don’t remember her name at this moment.

Expand full comment

Katalin Kariko'? I have seen early papers of mRNA gene therapy with her name and Drew Weissman. This is a paragraph from a paper:

"Conflict of interest statement. K.K. and D.W. have formed a small biotech company RNARx that receives funding from the National Institutes of Health to explore the use of nucleoside-modified mRNA for gene therapy."

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2943593/

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2775451/

Expand full comment

Where did she go wrong? I’ve read both. I’m not an expert in these areas or in analyzing write-ups of scientific data - or fraud. Seems, empirically, the 2nd article has some potential errors or flaws in it?? Or am I mistaken?

I remember Malone coming onto Steve Bannon’s show to announce the use of P rather than U - by “them”. He was white as a ghost. As hard as he tried to explain - nobody really understood.

Expand full comment

As evidenced by the short amount of time given to explain. It’s a tv show. What can be expected? Malone was frightened- I guess is my point. That was clear.

Expand full comment

University of Philadelphia/Pa. Can’t remember her name either. An oriental or Eastern Bloc,

Expand full comment

Anyone truly concerned about their reputation can sue anyone who defames them.

For $1.00.

The person we are discussing here, and his wife are suing at least 3 people for $25,000,000.

I had to look up how many zeros are in 25,000,000.

People who sue others for this kind of money are off my list to ever listen to or trust.

Expand full comment

Malone hooked his wagon to Mattias Desmet pretty early on which automatically set him at odds with the Breggins' because the approaches are so different. In Desmet's first interviews with Fuellmich in 2021, he looks like someone who's just been hit in the head and is still dazed. He knows something happened but he's not sure what. He admits that the whole first year of the pandemic, he puttered in his garden, oblivious to the larger, global implications of which he's supposedly an expert. By 2022 we get a book on Totalitarianism from him that is almost all philosophy and theology, with very little psychology. And a big chunk is blame the victim.

On the other hand the Breggins were on top of it from the beginning, and put the cause and the blame where it rightly belongs.

In this case, Malone's judgment was way off - but his massive ego (e.g., the Dos Equis spin-off) doesn't let him walk things back.

Expand full comment

Thank you for your observations.

You wrote perfectly what I have superficially observed.

The hubris in going after the Breggins still astonishes me.

I will admit that a great deal of my annoyance with Mr Balone is my familiarity with his background, attitude, age and supposed academia.

Theoretically, he could be best friends with either of my brothers.

I've seen and heard this "aw shucks" bravado before.

Expand full comment

The quantum could have been decided by his lawyers and/or he wants to deter others from smearing him. If he wasn't defamed his actions will backfire. Suing Breggins gives Breggins a forum to throw more mud. Oscar Wilde sued for defamation after being called a sodomite. It was the beginning of the end for him because he was.

Expand full comment

Malone is not what he appears to be. A good con-man knows the most effective lies are wrapped in as much truth as possible.

Expand full comment

Who gives a damn about Robert Malone, suing other freedom fighters for 25 million?

The only thing I care about right NOW…where is our missing past president on all the fraud, death and injuries by all the bioterrorism put out by our military/DOD/Pentagon?

If I was at Trump’s home last week this Mother Lion would have asked Trump…

Where the hell have you been after 21/2 years of serious evidence presented that humanity has been harmed and murdered thanks to this BIOTERRORISM WAR…and will continue until

we have serious leadership???

What should serious leadership look like today?

STOP ALL MANDATES, ‘VACCINES’ to stop this bioterrorism war! Secondly….accountability for this global criminal cartel!

Where is Trump?

I give him until this Friday as he has enough evidence to show the people the Leadership we need!

Expand full comment

Suing other physicians just doesn't fit and makes no sense. To divide those who want this evil to stop raises questions. Trump was played like a fine fiddle.

Expand full comment

So why did Breggins do it, and why does no one hold HIM accountable for it? That makes no sense to ME. He was divisive. He made unfounded accusations. Why do you make excuses for him?

Expand full comment

Wait, maybe it's the Breggins that are control op. That makes more sense. Malone is failing desperately as control op which is what convinces me, he is not.

Expand full comment

I believe Breggin addressed that in his own substack?

Expand full comment

Trump his deciding his strategy and tactics. He, not you, will decide when and in what manner to denounce the vaccines and the people who lied to him. He doesn't want to make political miscalculations. Denouncing the jabs at the wrong time or in the wrong manner only helps the RINOs and Dems.

Nobody wants Trump to denounce thd jabs more than RINOs do.

Expand full comment

I’m sure you are right. The frustration is the great harm that is on going and is not being shut down.

Expand full comment

Watching a video of him the other day he said he gave up on it after some years because he couldn't make it work. I would say the people that need to be held accountable are the ones that modified it with the pseudouridine and other things that shouldn't be injected into people.

Expand full comment

Come on Paul. He's the inventor of the technology, not the LNP's they used to transport the spike. But you already know this. Just stop already. Go outside and get some exercise, sunshine, clear your head. This isn't helping our cause and it's not healthy to continue this path.

Expand full comment

You’re a good man dr Paul we feel read and see that. We are angry too. We do not want to believe Malone was or is evil.

But the actual core message I’m parsing out is you’re outrage you perceive him to be hands off both stopping full stop any and all mRNA vaccines and also using his brain to break what we built and fix what he helped break.

And you are right in that front he needs to draw stronger lines particularly it’ll will help him get less suspicion. But he has to be able to sway the marginal mind and those who are only open to partial vaccine reform.

There are many different levels now of the red pilling and I think he’s trying to be able to reach the most and alienate the least.

But the shots and tech must end and a public announcement of a privately funded research group to treat/ reverse / help etc those harmed by this specific technology would do wonders and he should do. I don’t expect him to foot the bill fiscally.

But he could spend less time on tv and get back to the bench and start fixing if it’s even possible.

But perhaps he is already in his mind.

Or perhaps also he’s read the crowd and most people would not take a cure even if he made one that was the single best scientifically proven therapeutic in history .

The very dire sure maybe:

But many people are never allowing a doctor let alone filled hypodermic needle anywhere near them unless there is immanent and guaranteed death...

The reality is even he delivered exactly what you’re asking for there wouldn’t be many takers and it would pour thermite on the fire of the belief he’s a deep state shill and controlled opposition shill trying to grift victims - even if it was a bonafide cure with 0 side effects or risk and the entire pharma intelligence military industrial complex would undermine and destroy it:/

Flawed as he may be and maybe he’s totally guilty who knows but he’s human and cracks under pressure.

And maybe you’re cracking a but under outrage which I get I get into fits myself.

The injustice sickens me to my core to the point it makes me physically sick for small spells.

But he is not worth attacking or demanding things in this nature, he’s stubborn as duck and egotistical and as you’ve semi rightfully mocked “he’s sensitive “

But so are you and your big heart .

I don’t doubt you’d give your own life If you knew if would cure humanity of this devastating attack - you’re that kind of guy.

But we’re not there yet and we need you and especially don’t need you to be pursued by Malone or acolytes.

And while I know you gave no fear and I admire that, it may cost you valuable time and resources for which you have much better use.

And by no means be silent I don’t mean that just don’t let that big heart get the best of you.

Maybe try reaching out and apologizing and asking to partner with him to brainstorm high level therapies or something?

Just a thought please take no offence <3

Expand full comment

What a team that would be and a steps toward a cure for this secondary mental infection we are all trying to endure.

Expand full comment

I am not a medical professional. However I followed Dr Malone, Dr David Martin, Dr Ardis and Dr Montagnier from the very beginning, for very personal reasons. I started questioning the Pandemic, as I was reading information from US and China in parallel. Dr Malone was probably the very first one raising concerns and explaining that the technology was created for lab studies in order to treat or prevent cancer but did not work and all experimental animals died. He also talked about potential consequences.

From invention of mRNA to production, implementation, suspicious contracts, suspicious approvals, data hiding and abusive mandates, seems to be a money making plan behind at least. Actually explained so well by Dr Martin in his recent interview in “vaccine revealed 2023” ep 1.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nim.nih.gov/26913314/ ( if they didn’t deleted it)

“ pan-influenza or pan-coronavirus vaccine. A key driver is the media, and the economics follow the hype. We need to use that hype to our advantage to get to the real issues. Investors will respond if they see profit at the end of process, Daszak stated.”

Expand full comment

The developmrent of mRNA is a collaborative effort . One scientists discoveries are built upon by the next researcher and so on. The book Crispr lays it out! I believe Malone thinks that there is a role for mRNA if properly managed and is side stepping some of the narrative.

Expand full comment

How well do you know Dr. Robert Malone? I get the sense he’s a wolf in sheep’s clothing… CIA

Expand full comment

I agree, Dr. Alexander -- it's way past time to stop pretending a little more testing can fix what is wrong with the extremely toxic, experimental Covid-19 injectables. They are neither "safe" nor "effective." Their supposed mode of operation, injecting people with mRNA that codes for the most pathogenic part of the virus in order to turn the human body into a spike-producing factory, is insane and stupid. It makes sense only if the purpose is to cause harm.

Expand full comment

You need to separate who did the initial development, including the patents, and who put together the actual kill shot from that original research. Malone himself talks about the problems he and team encountered using pseudouridine to protect the RNA package from the bodies immune system. Not enough PU and there was not enough activation. Enough PU and it impacted the bodies immune system negatively. This is at least part of the reason he and his team stopped development.

Expand full comment

What an intelligent provocation! Bravo!

Expand full comment