41 Comments

You are a rare breed Dr. Alexander... people like you are few and far between... continue the good fight as long as you can... forever grateful.

Expand full comment

Malone took the mask off when he started to sue people.

Expand full comment

Dr. Mike Yeadon: “I’m Being Censored by What I Thought Was Our Own Side.”

I learned yesterday that dissenting voices in AfD had decided my opinions were too extreme and they’ve excised my presentation from the link to the session, which I understand has now been made public

https://lionessofjudah.substack.com/p/dr-mike-yeadon-im-being-censored

Expand full comment

Malone now touts 17 million killed by the jab. But he dumps on Yeadon for calling out the genocidal motives for the shot. Do tell.

Expand full comment
Nov 26, 2023·edited Nov 26, 2023

👏 👏 👏 👏 Bravo. Always telling it like it is. It's depressing, but the truth often is!!! So many grifters and turncoats. But I'm not surprised really. Doctors and Scientists are a strange breed. Often sociopathic in nature. Funny how we put them on a pedestal.

Expand full comment

Dr. Paul Alexander pulling back the curtain of deceit.

Expand full comment

I never trusted Malone. Something just didn’t sit right with me. Then he said he took the jab and at that moment I knew he was BS.

Expand full comment

BOOM! This was one of your best! I met Malone a couple of years ago at a FL conference and I have to say, he was quite stand-offish when I questioned him. I'm a biochemist with years of drug development experience and I asked him "why would you ever take ANYTHING from pharma without full and transparent development."? Didn't the change in distribution storage temp raise a red flag? His answer? "I gotta run"

When he sued the Breggins, that was it. They were there from the beginning and his book was there before Kennedy's. Seems like a lot of folks plagiarized off of them. Frankly, I don't know what Malone adds to the discussion other than his former creds.

Expand full comment

The problem is actually that still far too many people refuse to see that it was just the flu bro.

Expand full comment

OK, we have been on to Malone for a long time. Now what about Meryl Nass? she seemed to be such a leader, but is too busy defending Malone to see what else is going on.

Expand full comment

I knew Malone was full of it when I saw him on the Diamond and Silk Show early on when he was asked about graphene being in the shots. He said metal can get in the vials when the metal cap is put on in the packaging process, but that is very rare.

What a load of S!!T.

Expand full comment

-- ANCIENT TOP DEEP STATE -- DEEP UNDERGROUND TUNNEL SATANICS HAVE HEAVY EQUIPMENT TO FORESEE EVERYTHING. THEY BACK, & RUN EVERY EVIL. SATAN IS THE VERY FATHER OF A L L LIES, HE CANNOT TELL THE TRUTH, HATES GOD, EARTH, & EVERY HUMAN ON EARTH!!! THERE WILL BE AN ARMAGEDDON - EVEN THE ENEMY ADMITS IT. EVERY SYLLABLE HE SPEAKS IS A MURDEROUS LIE.

AGENDA 30 - “TOTAL WORLDWIDE GENOCIDE BY 2030 “ ...

Expand full comment

- T H A N K Y O U S I R

..!!!!

-- THEY ARE NOW USING TEAMS OF A.I. TO PURGE, SEARCHING, AND, CENSORING EVERY POSSIBLE VAXX DENIER - SEARCHING EVERYTHING YOU EVER WROTE TO TOTALLY CENCOR EVERY THOUGHT YOU WRITE - DENYING YOUR VERY EXISTENCE ...!!!

Expand full comment

Big Pharma, the AMA and the governments have been pushing for the development of expensive drugs and vaccines for decades, rather than focusing on curing the underlying problem(s) and naturally improving our immune systems. They continue to lie both about the benefits of the Terrain Theory and the effectiveness and safety of their drugs and vaccines. They even lie about what the Terrain Theory really means: From Bing AI popsci.com: " This theory ranges from total denial of the existence of viruses and bacteria to the belief that lifestyle choices alone force otherwise benevolent microbes to transform into pathogens.

I've never heard anyone every say this. To learn more about the true benefits of the Terrain Theory this is a good site to start with. https://www.terraintheory.net/ Remember there are many practitioners who practice the Terrain Theory and we are still in some respects, in the infancy of this science with all sorts of people on both sides of the isle, making and claiming various grandiose cures and benefits. Dietary and health sciences are extremely difficult sciences to draw conclusions as the human body, as with many living organism, are extremely complex but this doesn't stop the scammers from making outrageous claims to make the almighty buck. The list of FDA drugs pulled off the market, due to causing harm to people is quite extensive and all the benefits claimed by alternative practitioners is just as wrong. With that said there is a plethora of fantastic Doctors and other medical practitioners who are putting out the latest studies, theories and advice. It's a lot of work and time but no one is going to care about you more than yourself. Good luck and God speed.

Expand full comment

This is very disturbing. When you says Tucker you mean Tucker Carlson...? If yes, boy oh boy, can’t trust anyone can we? I purchased 5 bottles of Spike Support, my husband thinks Malone probably involved of making them and could be compromised. How do we know for sure that Malone is not involved in making of these spike support supplements? I bought but very concerned and can’t trust. Who knows? How about Dr. McCullough? Is he trustworthy?

Expand full comment

Libertarians believe in the right of secession and the fasci, socialist and communists do not. Here is what the AI, developed by Microsoft says about secession when I asked the following question.

First, however, there are five major principles of law and economics that need to be addressed. 1. the right of secession. 2. loser pays 3. the majorities consent to fund and enter wars 4. direct taxes on labor and homes and 5. The legality and legitimacy of the monopoly powers of a central bank. We will never live under peace and prosperity until these rights are protected.

This is the question I asked and from my research, Bing AI did a really good job answering the question. I seems the right of secession can be quite arbitrary in nature, and the commercial interest involved seems more important than the peace and prosperity of the people:

Are there any contradictions involving the right of secession in international law?

Searching for: contradictions in international law about the right of secession

Generating answers for you…

Yes, there are indeed contradictions and debates in international law regarding the right of secession. Here are some key points:

The right to self-determination, which can include secession, is considered one of the most controversial principles of international law 1.

Unilateral secession is seen as a legally neutral act; it is neither expressly accepted nor prohibited by international law 1.

There is considerable debate among legal scholars and national states about the existence of a right to secession2.

The principle of uti possidetis juris, which maintains existing borders when new states are created, interacts strongly with the principle of effectiveness and has created considerable debate, especially outside the colonial context2.

Some authors consider that in international law, there is a tacit right to secession recognized in certain documents, while others believe such a right does not and should not exist3.

These contradictions reflect the complexity of the issue and the balance that international law tries to maintain between respecting the sovereignty of states and acknowledging the rights of ethnic and cultural groups. It’s a multifaceted issue with roots in historical, political, and geopolitical factors. It’s always important to consider the complexity of such issues.

Learn more:

1. e-ir.info

2. oxfordbibliographies.com

3. link.springer.com

4. bing.com

5. cambridge.org

6. cambridge.org

7. doi.org

8. doi.org

+6 more

Expand full comment