I disagree. If some of those doctors were actually doing good work, even to the point of gently steering patients away from the C19 vactine, and if they were given an ultimatum of either getting jabs or losing their ability to practice good medicine, they may have chosen to risk their own lives by getting jabbed rather than standing on principle and losing their jobs.
I disagree. If some of those doctors were actually doing good work, even to the point of gently steering patients away from the C19 vactine, and if they were given an ultimatum of either getting jabs or losing their ability to practice good medicine, they may have chosen to risk their own lives by getting jabbed rather than standing on principle and losing their jobs.
An Ominous. Doctors are not researchers and do not read research journals. They tend to read professional journals only, which are full of bullshit. They did not know Pfizer's clinical trials were fraudulently conducted
Very few doctors are psychopaths. Only one speciality, surgeon, is in the top 10. Many more of the commenters here would be psychopaths, % wise, than doctors.
I know of several doctors who have died from overwork. If doctors were psychopaths they would have chosen some other psychopath-preferred career path like policing, the military, clergy, journalist, or the law.
Obliviously your definition of "actually doing good work", is different than mine. If a doctor isn't doing research ahead of time before taking the fang bang themselves, then what they do or recommend in your "if" & "may" scenarios isn't "actually doing good work." Meaning, practice what you preach doesn't mean much to you or them.
All the animals died or were put under coz of terrible cancer. Those are terrible choices to risk your own life for a sudden death or a small amount of years living with cancer. Either way they can't practice anyways. You've just defeated your whole purpose for taking the jab. Thus, it makes no sense to make such a decision to take the jab unless you didn't do the research. There are tons of research for many decades on this issue. Which I go back to "actually doing good work" doesn't apply to them.
A lot of 'ifs' and 'mays'. Let's just ask the Drs' that walked rather than accept or promulgate the unethical, consent-lite, negative risk benefit, unpredictable BioNTech shots?
It takes years of training to be a doctor and more years to be a very experienced doctor. Impossible they did not know the toxicity and simply relied on government propaganda. Impossible that they were blind to the facts....they have the training unlike the general public.
The doctors complied, took the jabs and paid the ultimate price...DEATH. No one to blame but themselves.
I disagree. If some of those doctors were actually doing good work, even to the point of gently steering patients away from the C19 vactine, and if they were given an ultimatum of either getting jabs or losing their ability to practice good medicine, they may have chosen to risk their own lives by getting jabbed rather than standing on principle and losing their jobs.
An Ominous. Doctors are not researchers and do not read research journals. They tend to read professional journals only, which are full of bullshit. They did not know Pfizer's clinical trials were fraudulently conducted
Very few doctors are psychopaths. Only one speciality, surgeon, is in the top 10. Many more of the commenters here would be psychopaths, % wise, than doctors.
I know of several doctors who have died from overwork. If doctors were psychopaths they would have chosen some other psychopath-preferred career path like policing, the military, clergy, journalist, or the law.
Most are altruistic, ethical people.
Wow, I never knew about the professions that attract psychopaths: https://www.businessinsider.com/professions-with-the-most-psychopaths-2018-5?op=1#1-ceo-10
I am not surprised to see civil servant and lawyer also being on the list.
ЁЯСМ
Obliviously your definition of "actually doing good work", is different than mine. If a doctor isn't doing research ahead of time before taking the fang bang themselves, then what they do or recommend in your "if" & "may" scenarios isn't "actually doing good work." Meaning, practice what you preach doesn't mean much to you or them.
All the animals died or were put under coz of terrible cancer. Those are terrible choices to risk your own life for a sudden death or a small amount of years living with cancer. Either way they can't practice anyways. You've just defeated your whole purpose for taking the jab. Thus, it makes no sense to make such a decision to take the jab unless you didn't do the research. There are tons of research for many decades on this issue. Which I go back to "actually doing good work" doesn't apply to them.
A lot of 'ifs' and 'mays'. Let's just ask the Drs' that walked rather than accept or promulgate the unethical, consent-lite, negative risk benefit, unpredictable BioNTech shots?
You donтАЩt put life down as very important. They were all greedy and self opinionated.
It takes years of training to be a doctor and more years to be a very experienced doctor. Impossible they did not know the toxicity and simply relied on government propaganda. Impossible that they were blind to the facts....they have the training unlike the general public.
The doctors complied, took the jabs and paid the ultimate price...DEATH. No one to blame but themselves.