I don’t agree with your assertion that he believes in pseudoscience of environmental issues. The climate issue is not an all in or nothing is wrong (while certain groups continue to destroy our planet making big profits). Bobby knows the tricks and games. I think he would support sensible solutions, not crazy ones nor pretend everything is ok.
I don’t agree with your assertion that he believes in pseudoscience of environmental issues. The climate issue is not an all in or nothing is wrong (while certain groups continue to destroy our planet making big profits). Bobby knows the tricks and games. I think he would support sensible solutions, not crazy ones nor pretend everything is ok.
I never said he believes in the pseudoscience of environmental issues; most of his environmental stances are spot-on, as is his stance on vaccines.
The ones destroying the planet are the ones engaged in deforestation, overfishing, huge mono-cultures of palm oil plants, etc., and spewing toxins into our air and water and bodies, etc. But CO2 isn't a pollutant by any measurement: it's necessary for life. And, it's doing virtually nothing to our atmosphere or our planet.
The question everyone is ignoring is, why does a man who gets so much right get the climate issue completely and utterly wrong, and refuses to change? People tell me he's changed but the only evidence they give is that he says that the climate issue is being used by the Davos crowd to further their agenda, not that the issue is a bogus one.
If every scientific journal on the planet tells one that catastrophic CO2 tipping points are here and drastic action is urgently needed, then what's a "sensible solution"? That's a slippery road.
I think this twitter video explains what I believe the overall plan is: the next great emergency will be climate catastrophe requiring necessary measures. No doubt all of these necessary measures can be framed as nudging free market participants toward energy transition as part of the 'invisible hand' of the marketplace. It all fits in with Kennedy's promotion of free market solutions ....
I don’t agree with your assertion that he believes in pseudoscience of environmental issues. The climate issue is not an all in or nothing is wrong (while certain groups continue to destroy our planet making big profits). Bobby knows the tricks and games. I think he would support sensible solutions, not crazy ones nor pretend everything is ok.
I never said he believes in the pseudoscience of environmental issues; most of his environmental stances are spot-on, as is his stance on vaccines.
The ones destroying the planet are the ones engaged in deforestation, overfishing, huge mono-cultures of palm oil plants, etc., and spewing toxins into our air and water and bodies, etc. But CO2 isn't a pollutant by any measurement: it's necessary for life. And, it's doing virtually nothing to our atmosphere or our planet.
The question everyone is ignoring is, why does a man who gets so much right get the climate issue completely and utterly wrong, and refuses to change? People tell me he's changed but the only evidence they give is that he says that the climate issue is being used by the Davos crowd to further their agenda, not that the issue is a bogus one.
If every scientific journal on the planet tells one that catastrophic CO2 tipping points are here and drastic action is urgently needed, then what's a "sensible solution"? That's a slippery road.
You make sense and I see your point. Will have to explore this more closely. Thank you for your comment.
https://twitter.com/JD71723577/status/1675170559322144768
I think this twitter video explains what I believe the overall plan is: the next great emergency will be climate catastrophe requiring necessary measures. No doubt all of these necessary measures can be framed as nudging free market participants toward energy transition as part of the 'invisible hand' of the marketplace. It all fits in with Kennedy's promotion of free market solutions ....