you do not understand how ANW writes nor I. I have my own view. like you here ANW has freedom to post. I think it is provocative and interesting and good. Sherlock, it does not take a Sherlock to understand me. I fin it hilarious how some folk come here, not their stack, here, and tell me what to think, wrote etc. dont even show their fa…
you do not understand how ANW writes nor I. I have my own view. like you here ANW has freedom to post. I think it is provocative and interesting and good. Sherlock, it does not take a Sherlock to understand me. I fin it hilarious how some folk come here, not their stack, here, and tell me what to think, wrote etc. dont even show their faces...nor names. do I care what you think? no...do I like that you write here? of course. keep writing.
Doesn't matter if we meet someone in person. You yourself have shared many times how people you thought were decent during Trumps first turn turned out to not be what they appeared to be. People in the Freedom movement too. I, and others here, think you give him too much credence based upon his body of postings. Just pointing that out. I'm not directing policy or telling people what to conclude without looking at it themselves first. But as someone who was following the Breggins long before I discovered you, and got an early copy of their "Covid 19 and the Global Predators" manuscript before it was in book form, and paid for an early conference where they were one of the tier-1 guests, I'm telling you to be careful with ANW. Even the devil will use 90% truth to slip in 10% lies. Take the warning or not, but it seems he's getting more 'airplay' and some of us are concerned. Just as I've been concerned about the "reinvention of Robert Malone" for years. Malone is just slicker and better funded.
Seriously, the nerve of this asshole! I certainly don't need or want his, or whatever its pronouns are, respect. But he/she/it comes onto Paul's stack and starts trying to control him, telling him what to do and what not to do, finding fault and offering his/her/its gratuitous, unsolicited advice. You or I would never have such disrespect. When Paul wants an opinion on something he asks for it. This little Fauci saw an opportunity to both attack me and try to throw his/her/its weight around at Paul at the same time. He/she/it is like another "DS," the dip shit deep state Ukraine flag waver.
You get airplay dude and you clearly are attempting to direct policy and to tell Paul what to do despite your denial. Your call for censorship, which is essentially what it is, is reminiscent of Zuckerberg and Dorsey, both on the Horsemen List?
So, are you a Horseman, Sherlock? I am from a background, raised in it, more Right-wing than leftists like you can possibly imagine.
Actually, I'll tell you what you are. What you are is a Fauci, maybe not with exactly the same ideology on the shots, not exactly, but you are much like him. Fauci is a control freak, like you are a control freak. His control freakery is why he and many others like him mandated shots.
More precisely, Fauci has been called a "bureaucratic compulsive with narcissistic features." It's very similar to a psychopath, and it's possible to be both a psychopath and a compulsive, although psychopaths are undercontrollers and the Faucis of this world are overcontrollers. There's also what's been called a "puritanical compulsive with paranoid features." Only people who are paranoid would think I'm deep state. Could it be that you're paranoid and you have a "narcissistic epistemology" which means you are full of self-importance and believe your own brain farts? You have no concept of rival hypotheses. You think your thoughts are true just because you have them.
How can I say all of this about you and be so accurate? It's because I've seen YOUR body of postings. They say more about you than they do about me.
As regards the subject of this stack, which was about what I said, not about me, although you, with your love of sophistry and in particular argumentum ad hominem, decided to try to make it about me, and are receiving this treatment in return, are my premises true or false and is my reasoning sound?
The fact is, RFK Jr did say that Trump is a psychopath. The fact is, I said that was a dumb thing to do.
Trying to "one up" Paul on how you discovered the Breggens before you discovered him etc just makes you look full of yourself, as well as deluded, which, given that you think I'm deep state, you are.
you do not understand how ANW writes nor I. I have my own view. like you here ANW has freedom to post. I think it is provocative and interesting and good. Sherlock, it does not take a Sherlock to understand me. I fin it hilarious how some folk come here, not their stack, here, and tell me what to think, wrote etc. dont even show their faces...nor names. do I care what you think? no...do I like that you write here? of course. keep writing.
Doesn't matter if we meet someone in person. You yourself have shared many times how people you thought were decent during Trumps first turn turned out to not be what they appeared to be. People in the Freedom movement too. I, and others here, think you give him too much credence based upon his body of postings. Just pointing that out. I'm not directing policy or telling people what to conclude without looking at it themselves first. But as someone who was following the Breggins long before I discovered you, and got an early copy of their "Covid 19 and the Global Predators" manuscript before it was in book form, and paid for an early conference where they were one of the tier-1 guests, I'm telling you to be careful with ANW. Even the devil will use 90% truth to slip in 10% lies. Take the warning or not, but it seems he's getting more 'airplay' and some of us are concerned. Just as I've been concerned about the "reinvention of Robert Malone" for years. Malone is just slicker and better funded.
Respectfully, it's not a competition, Sherlock.
It's interesting to hear the viewpoints of others.
And, as I've suggested elsewhere, not everything that individuals post is meant to be taken literally.
Seriously, the nerve of this asshole! I certainly don't need or want his, or whatever its pronouns are, respect. But he/she/it comes onto Paul's stack and starts trying to control him, telling him what to do and what not to do, finding fault and offering his/her/its gratuitous, unsolicited advice. You or I would never have such disrespect. When Paul wants an opinion on something he asks for it. This little Fauci saw an opportunity to both attack me and try to throw his/her/its weight around at Paul at the same time. He/she/it is like another "DS," the dip shit deep state Ukraine flag waver.
You get airplay dude and you clearly are attempting to direct policy and to tell Paul what to do despite your denial. Your call for censorship, which is essentially what it is, is reminiscent of Zuckerberg and Dorsey, both on the Horsemen List?
So, are you a Horseman, Sherlock? I am from a background, raised in it, more Right-wing than leftists like you can possibly imagine.
Actually, I'll tell you what you are. What you are is a Fauci, maybe not with exactly the same ideology on the shots, not exactly, but you are much like him. Fauci is a control freak, like you are a control freak. His control freakery is why he and many others like him mandated shots.
More precisely, Fauci has been called a "bureaucratic compulsive with narcissistic features." It's very similar to a psychopath, and it's possible to be both a psychopath and a compulsive, although psychopaths are undercontrollers and the Faucis of this world are overcontrollers. There's also what's been called a "puritanical compulsive with paranoid features." Only people who are paranoid would think I'm deep state. Could it be that you're paranoid and you have a "narcissistic epistemology" which means you are full of self-importance and believe your own brain farts? You have no concept of rival hypotheses. You think your thoughts are true just because you have them.
How can I say all of this about you and be so accurate? It's because I've seen YOUR body of postings. They say more about you than they do about me.
As regards the subject of this stack, which was about what I said, not about me, although you, with your love of sophistry and in particular argumentum ad hominem, decided to try to make it about me, and are receiving this treatment in return, are my premises true or false and is my reasoning sound?
The fact is, RFK Jr did say that Trump is a psychopath. The fact is, I said that was a dumb thing to do.
Trying to "one up" Paul on how you discovered the Breggens before you discovered him etc just makes you look full of yourself, as well as deluded, which, given that you think I'm deep state, you are.
Fascinating how he, or whatever its pronouns are, arrogantly assumes that you have not read Alinsky's "Rules for Radicals."
nice post