81 Comments

Even if we have 81% of the US that took at least one shot, less than 10% are now getting boosted...there will NOT be any rioting in the streets if the shots are stopped. I would say that there are now 80% of people that never want to take another Covid jab, EVER!

STOP THE SHOTS

Expand full comment

I agree. No rioting. The dumb sheep have been duped. But don’t think they have any love for us anti vaxers. They just want to get on with their little lives and forget Covid. And therin lies the danger. Many aren’t bothered about justice.

Expand full comment

"They just want to get on with their little lives and forget Covid."

Yes

Expand full comment

yes

Expand full comment

STOP THE SHOTS - I agree.

But right now, RFK Jr is under massive attack in the fake news on his suitability for confirmation because he called on the FDA to remove the EUA in mid 2021 and because he said that the mRNA "vaccines" were the most deadly "vaccines" ever invented.

It's being claimed that his "antivaxx" views (which he denies having; he wants "new and improved" vaccines, not the elimination of vaccines) render him "unfit" (and not just for the nomination but, it's implied, also for "polite society.")

Less than 10% may now be getting the booster, when they perceive that there's no need, but that doesn't mean they want the ZOPTION taken away to get one next time they are whipped into a frenzy of fear.

There's also something called "cognitive dissonance" which means that a substantial number who took the shots are going to vehemently resist any notion that they got it wrong and they will see removal of the shots as communistic and the antithesis of liberty.

Expand full comment

I prefer the phrase: cognitive ignorance, as it is more appropriate and fits the bill far better!

Expand full comment

I like that!

Expand full comment

I agree. They wont riot, at the most people who are so brainwashed that they think they will die without it, which is very sad, its also part of the psychological operation that was executed, to associate health, security and ACESS to the public if you take mRNA shots and illness and death if you dont take it. Its also part of the transhumanist digital plan, you are only "human" or "worthy" (of being granted rights) if you take the newest improved mRNA or other shots.

Expand full comment

In Germany they wouldn't riot, because the Germans are docile sheep who lived the Milgram experiment before USA did. The Germans do what they are told. But the US was founded on the notion of liberty. Americans rebel against perceived overreach. They didn't rebel against the shots because they didn't perceive it to be overreach. Sometimes the rebellion is good, as was the case with the peaceful J6 protest at the CAPITOL that was falsely characterized as an insurrection. However, cities burnt during the BLM/antifa riots during Trump 1.0 and the same people plus others would riot during Trump 2.0. The vast majority of the American people did not vote during the recent presidential election and only a few % less of those who did vote who voted for Trump voted for Harris. That's where your rioters would come from.

Expand full comment

TPTB are now injecting cats and dogs with mRNA and nano-tech crap that was in the human inoculations as they are fully aware of the push-back against adding more cult members who now out-rightly reject any and all "vaccines" [experimental inoculations]. Hence they are pollution our pets. One face lick from your dog or cat will immediately boost you to death! This has to stop. This is currently ongoing in every animal shelter in California. Additionally, the mRNA and all other adverse ingredients previously in the human experimental inoculation is included in the distemper injections to all dogs in CA.

Expand full comment

I agree. The danger lies in the intentions and hands of those who are still.willing and ready to even lie and manipulate masses.

Expand full comment

We all need to push back and do what we all can to STOP THE SHOTS—ALL the shots!

Expand full comment

Glad to read a medical doctor expressing this opinion.

Expand full comment

It's a very brave doctor who does so as they have been fucked over big time.

Expand full comment

Or any mRNA shots for anything, thus the street aka the public square will decide as in all matters.

Expand full comment

The vaccine cult is a religion.

Expand full comment

it is

Expand full comment

Thanks for the shout out Paul. Since you posted this stack I've picked up a heap of new subscribers and followers.

Expand full comment

Correct Heather B. The religion is a death cult. It's a "cult of coerced mass vaccination salvation hysteria." What I find fascinating is that the roots of it are in the "cult of mass depopulation salvation from purported anthropogenic climate change hysteria."

Expand full comment

It is not said aloud (because we are midern people) but as in any cult or religion or ideology, sacrifices are the sign of true commitment.

Everyone who shuns that sort of communal commitment is viewed as a coward, a traitor, or even an enemy.

The idea of active evolution through negative selection (even if it may involve culling) is an additional incentive for any harsh measures. These kinds of thoughts have been ingrained in us and held as justified in many of our cultural traditions. Only a rational and sensible application of law can trump our atavistic impulse to kill someone or even ourselves for the higher good of the conmunity.

In our history superstition was often stronger than a rational inquiry and application of reasonable law was, especially in times of crises and threats.

In truth the sacrifice is to be considered murder. (That's how the most famous human sacrifice had been regarded in the sacred writings of that one's followers. The sacrificial aspect therein is secondary interpretation: true, not by reasonable intent, though, but by murderous irrationality.)

With such dangerous and nefarious inclination towards superstition and irrational cruelty we are dealing.

A higly sophisticated art of the deal is called for, and I am not sure it will be employed and suffice to convince the angered and threatened masses who have subscribed to a belief in the value of a murderous or at least somewhat harmful sacrifice.

The denial of this aspect is the modern taboo: known by most but not to be talked about or even mentioned. It is being actively shamed and passively shameful (for the reason of its recklessness and cruelty and harm without justification).

Expand full comment

The Lottery by Shirley Jackson

Expand full comment

Very apposite! By the way Kathleen, have you ever seen "Dogville" by Lars Von Trier, starring Nicole Kidman? It's a morality tale and one of my favorite movies. It was polarizing. Here's a trailer, if you haven't seen it

https://youtu.be/WiFeXcc9Xbg?si=vBYFRDb8-CDsRBTn

Expand full comment

Thank you for the luminous, intriguing trailer, ANW. I'm very interested to see this movie.

I've always liked Nicole Kidman and will make a particular point to see Dogville soon. Will let you know my impressions. ~ K

Expand full comment

Well said Hans. I have never yet met a single murderer who did not believe that their victim had it coming to them. There are many people walking around right now who are alive only because murder is illegal.

Expand full comment

I think ANW is more or less correct in his assessment since it is imperative to let the American people know what has been (and is being) done to them first. All RFK has to do is release ALL DoD/CDC/FDA data relating to the bioweapons, including internal e-mails. If the MSM will not report, then present them at an official press conference. Once the population realises the true number of victims, all hell will break loose.

If this is not done a short time after RFK assumes office, we will know they are all murderous, deep-state, psycho sell-outs.

Expand full comment

Exactly. It can't just be done in an authoritarian "top down" manner. The American people need to know what has (and is being) done to them first. One cannot be, like Sherlock here, a little Fauci in reverse, because that's still being a Fauci.

Expand full comment

Alright, this makes sense about RFK jr. 's Covid Vaccine strategy if this is really what is going on.

If Trump is advocating for the military who got the boot for refusing the shot, let's hope that by extension he will do the same for those of us civilians who lost our careers for the same reason. And, not to mention all the vaccine I jured!!!

Expand full comment

ANW I love your comment and I agree with you. I have read that RFK says he wants to have placebo controlled studies before shots can be approved, just like medicines. And he wants transparency on shot ingredients and toxicity. So I think he will use this to convince Trump to stop some shots, but realistically not all. Hey, it’s still up to us, we the people, to do our own research before we take any intervention. Based on all my research, I personally will never take any shot again. Did not take the COVID shots thank god, but have taken shots before then. So I have really learned my lesson over the last five years.

Expand full comment

loved it so much I report it here: ANW I love your comment and I agree with you. I have read that RFK says he wants to have placebo controlled studies before shots can be approved, just like medicines. And he wants transparency on shot ingredients and toxicity. So I think he will use this to convince Trump to stop some shots, but realistically not all. Hey, it’s still up to us, we the people, to do our own research before we take any intervention. Based on all my research, I personally will never take any shot again. Did not take the COVID shots thank god, but have taken shots before then. So I have really learned my lesson over the last five years.

Expand full comment

" Hey, it’s still up to us, we the people, to do our own research before we take any intervention. "

It should be. But its not, unfortunately.

You are excluded from day-care centers, kindergarten, schools etc. if you dont get all the shots or have exceptions.

Its the sad reality.

The insanity didnt start 4 years ago, it goes back decades and encompasses all vaccines.

They exclude you from entering restaurants without your mRNA shots, but then again, they also exclude from kindergarten etc without "traditional" vaccines (which are still unnatural products). You are human, not tech. Soon to be changed.

Expand full comment

Yes, even more than a hundred years. People were incarcerated in Massachusetts and the state was vindicated by the Supreme Court.

Jacobson vs. Massachusetts, 1905

https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=16169198038706839183

Expand full comment

Yes it's the sad reality that many of the American people still love their shots!

Expand full comment

Thank you David. We are on the same page on this issue.

Expand full comment

Once again AwakeNotWoke acts like Deep State, fomenting dissent. You really have to stop listening to this guy. He has you going in circles. Many of us have seen his true stripes for years now. You give him unneeded airplay. Move on from the guy. He's playing on your excitability. Stay focused and given Trump/Kennedy a chance. Deep State and Big Harma would love to drive a wedge there. Deep State doesn't go away because Trump sworn in. The Psyop attempts will continue. ANW is like arguing with the devil. He's in love with his self-important views, and works to bring dissent right out of the gate. You've been warned a few times, and he keeps using your natural passion for his own purposes. Read "Rules for Radicals" by Saul Alinsky. You'll then recognize some of the techniques taken to a new level.

Expand full comment

you do not understand how ANW writes nor I. I have my own view. like you here ANW has freedom to post. I think it is provocative and interesting and good. Sherlock, it does not take a Sherlock to understand me. I fin it hilarious how some folk come here, not their stack, here, and tell me what to think, wrote etc. dont even show their faces...nor names. do I care what you think? no...do I like that you write here? of course. keep writing.

Expand full comment

Doesn't matter if we meet someone in person. You yourself have shared many times how people you thought were decent during Trumps first turn turned out to not be what they appeared to be. People in the Freedom movement too. I, and others here, think you give him too much credence based upon his body of postings. Just pointing that out. I'm not directing policy or telling people what to conclude without looking at it themselves first. But as someone who was following the Breggins long before I discovered you, and got an early copy of their "Covid 19 and the Global Predators" manuscript before it was in book form, and paid for an early conference where they were one of the tier-1 guests, I'm telling you to be careful with ANW. Even the devil will use 90% truth to slip in 10% lies. Take the warning or not, but it seems he's getting more 'airplay' and some of us are concerned. Just as I've been concerned about the "reinvention of Robert Malone" for years. Malone is just slicker and better funded.

Expand full comment

Respectfully, it's not a competition, Sherlock.

It's interesting to hear the viewpoints of others.

And, as I've suggested elsewhere, not everything that individuals post is meant to be taken literally.

Expand full comment

Seriously, the nerve of this asshole! I certainly don't need or want his, or whatever its pronouns are, respect. But he/she/it comes onto Paul's stack and starts trying to control him, telling him what to do and what not to do, finding fault and offering his/her/its gratuitous, unsolicited advice. You or I would never have such disrespect. When Paul wants an opinion on something he asks for it. This little Fauci saw an opportunity to both attack me and try to throw his/her/its weight around at Paul at the same time. He/she/it is like another "DS," the dip shit deep state Ukraine flag waver.

Expand full comment

You get airplay dude and you clearly are attempting to direct policy and to tell Paul what to do despite your denial. Your call for censorship, which is essentially what it is, is reminiscent of Zuckerberg and Dorsey, both on the Horsemen List?

So, are you a Horseman, Sherlock? I am from a background, raised in it, more Right-wing than leftists like you can possibly imagine.

Actually, I'll tell you what you are. You are a Fauci, maybe not with exactly the same ideology on the shots, not exactly, but you are of the same, or nearly the same, character. Fauci is a control freak, like you are a control freak. His control freakery is why he and many others like him mandated shots.

More precisely, Fauci is what's called a "bureaucratic compulsive with narcissistic features. It's very similar to a psychopath, and it's possible to be both a psychopath and a compulsive, although psychopaths are undercontrollers and you and Fauci are overcontrollers. You have elements of that but you are more exactly what's called a "puritanical compulsive with paranoid features." That's why you think I'm deep state. You're paranoid and you have a "narcissistic epistemology" which means you are full of self-importance and believe your own brain farts. You have no concept of rival hypotheses. You think your thoughts are true just because you have them.

How can I say all of this about you and be so accurate? It's because I've seen YOUR body of postings. They say more about you than they do about me.

As regards the subject of this stack, which was about what I said, not about me, although you, with your love of sophistry and in particular argumentum ad hominem, decided to try to make it about me, and are receiving this treatment in return, are my premises true or false and is my reasoning sound?

The fact is, RFK Jr did say that Trump is a psychopath. The fact is, zi said that was a dumb thing to do.

Trying to "one up" Paul on how you discovered the Breggens before you discovered him etc just makes you look full of yourself, as well as deluded, which you are.

Expand full comment

Fascinating how he, or whatever its pronouns are, arrogantly assumes that you have not read Alinsky's "Rules for Radicals."

Expand full comment

nice post

Expand full comment

Here's one of my prior postings on Paul's stack. Did this upset you Sherlock?

"[T]ake a deep dive into ICD-11 anankastic personality disorder, also known as "obsessive compulsive personality disorder (OCPD)" and in particular the subtype referred to by Theodore Millon, originator of the American Psychiatric Association's Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders' personality disorders (PD) classification, as "bureaucratic compulsive with narcissistic features."

Most of the health bureaucrats responsible for pushing the jabs appeark to be afflicted with it. Think of Fauci. It's believed to be the most common disorder of serial killers. Think of Hillary Clinton and Hitler. And Greta Thunberg. And serial killer Colonel Russell Williams. It's closely related to a subtype of sadism ("sadistic personality with compulsive features").

People with anankastic PD believe they know everything, are never wrong, and are morally superior. The vaxxed ones feel very superior to the unjabbed. They have "perspective taking deficits" and are functionally rigid, meaning they cannot recognize and correct for mistakes or modify their perspectives to take account of new data. They cannot be convinced they are wrong. They just get angry when confronted with evidence or proof that they are wrong. They just double down on their mistakes and order more jabs.

They're control freaks who feel justified in imposing their neurosis on others. There are even some who are anti-vaxx, although a lot more appear to be pro-vaxx. The anti-vaxx ones tend to have a subtype called "puritanical compulsive with paranoid features." On the upside, I suppose, they tend to dislike profanity and lazy people. They are also punctual and neat. Whatever their subtype, after disposing of a victim's body, they invariably clean their car so well it looks like it has been detailed. Academia is full of them as are cops and the higher ranks of the military.

Unfortunately, the health bureaucracy is also full of them. The majority of them love jabs so much they would glue themselves to the road, just like many of them do to protest carbon emissions, and would have no hesitation in preventing ambulances from getting patients to hospitals, if they thought doing so would increase jab uptake. Their cause is always more important in their eyes than the rights of others. They are very self righteous. "How dare you! How dare you not get a booster. How dare you use profanity. You have stolen my dreams ... etc"

Expand full comment

Here's something I posted on the stack of one of Peter Breggen's colleagues, which earned me a "like" from the author:

"Many of these regulators are a classic case of ICD-11 Anankastic Personality Disorder aka Obsessive Compulsive Personality Disorder (OCPD) They're "musturbators." Their speech and thought patterns are full of "must," "should," "ought." They're functionally rigid. They pluck their "should rules" out of their ass ("everyone should get vaccinated" etc). They think they know everything and are never wrong.

They want to control other people. They think their way is the only right way. They have empathy and perspective-taking deficits. They can't be dissuaded by evidence. They're obsessed with morality and ethics but are quite unscrupulous ("forcing people to get vaccinated and telling lies for science is the morally right thing to do"). They rise to the top of regulatory bodies. They're also common in military leadership positions and in academia.

It's the disorder of tyrants. Hitler was a classic. It was impossible to persuade Hitler of his mistakes. Fauci is the same. Fauci's subtype is clearly Theodore Millon's "bureaucratic compulsive with narcissistic features." There are some on our side, oposed to the vax. They do the movement a great disservice. They are Faucis too, just with a different ideology."

Expand full comment

Maybe it was this post, on Paul's stack, that upset you Sherlock:

"Malone is so boring. He may be full of himself but he refuses to double down on his mistakes and push the shots. Fauci, Walensky, Birx are where it's at:

'The bureaucratic compulsive displays signs of narcissistic traits alongside the compulsivity. They are champions of tradition, values, and bureaucracy. They cherish organizations that follow hierarchies and feel comforted by definitive roles between subordinates and superiors, and the known expectations and responsibilities. They derive their identity from work and project an image of diligence, reliability, and commitment to their institution. They view work and productivity in a polarized manner; either done or not. They may use their power and status to inflict fear and obedience in their subordinates if they do not strictly follow their rules and procedures, and derive pleasure from the sense of control and power that they acquire by doing so.' "

Expand full comment

I strongly disagree with that last statement, Americans love their vax! With all the truth dribbling out, I think a lot of Americans know they were duped by the Biden administration. What I have been hearing is just the opposite, people are not trusting big Pharma and any drugs! I agree with that completely. I do not trust many doctors or any drugs companies at all, every time I see a new drug being approved by FDA, I change the channel. I do not trust FDA, CDC, MOST DOCTORS, OR BIG PHARMA!

Expand full comment

Too little information at this time to opine on RFK Jr.'s true intentions. That'll change soon enough.

Expand full comment

Yes, it's always possible to be wrong in one's opinions. On the one hand, RFK Jr has said he's not anti-vaxx, he just wants new and improved shots. On the other hand, he called on the FDA to revoke the EUAs and called the mRNA shots the most dangerous "vaccines" ever developed.

Expand full comment

The mRNA abominations are not vaccines nor shots nor jabs. They are bioweapons designed to kill, harm and sterilise. Why is that?

1 - Basic math - inserting 40,000,000,000,000 (Moderna) (12 trillion Pfizer) non-human genetic coding molecules into around 50 million muscle cells and expecting them to stay there is criminal lunacy.

2 - We only have approx. 4 trillion nucleated cells in our whole body. This means, theoretically, every single one could be transfected (x10) by a foreign genetic code, for a toxic pathogen, ie the spike protein.

3 - The, especially adaptive, immune system will attack and destroy any cells presenting foreign proteins, by design.

3- In other words, they are bioweapons; what could go wrong?

https://evolutionaryhealthplan.info/#_Ref83404023

Expand full comment

I would hope most people by now are aware of the hoax and the dangers of the shots, but I have no way to know for sure. I suspect outright bans would not work as enough people will generally resist that sort of move against their freedom to choose, especially after the experience of last four years. Educate people. Make truth the law of the land in medicine. Changing the vaccine liability rules, forcing drug companies to do adequate testing and reporting of the real efficacy and side effects, replacing the FDA with an ethical competent agency, ridding the CDC of corruption and Pharma sycophants is obviously a harder road to go, but it would have more success. RFK likely understands that and is not taking the easiest path.

Expand full comment

Look at this one Paul, i don't get it - Trump rescinded EO - Executive Order 14099 of May 9, 2023 (Moving Beyond COVID-19 Vaccination Requirements for Federal Workers).

https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/01/initial-rescissions-of-harmful-executive-orders-and-actions/

Expand full comment

It does indeed appear from a quick reading that Trump has reinstated EO - Executive Order 14043, which imposed vaccine mandates for federal workers.

Expand full comment

No, I don't agree with him. I literally know almost no one that would line up for another shot.

Expand full comment

If you're hanging out with vaxxers, you may be being shed on. Sounds like you're hanging out with vaxxers, because they couldn't line up for "another" unless they'd already had some. Even if you have a representative sample. It's possible they'd want the option of having another shot next time they're whipped into a frenzy of fear like they were last time.

Expand full comment

My statement clearly denotes vaxxers who have woken up to the truths of the campaign, and that they were tricked. Never again, they say. You do realize lots of vaxxed people are now seeing the lies, right?

Expand full comment

I love that, the jab cult would lose their minds in other words. If you're right and RFK Jr does stop them, I have a feeling Trump wont only fire him, he'll send him to Siberia.

Expand full comment

My two cents for what it’s worth. RFK, Jr. is low keying it purposely so as not to upset the apple cart unnecessarily, it’s already been tipped so why make applesauce by stomping on things right now. The less the better prior to confirmation for which he met the senators and likely got that feedback to not go hard on issues yet. The most important piece I think is this: he’s stated he wants transparency from previous trials and wants true placebo RCT’s done. Then, the vaxxers of the world, Offit, Hotez, Gates, Trump maybe, etc. have no where to go because anything less than actually “following the science” from trials will backfire.

Expand full comment

My opinionis is that let's be honest here--who REALLY knows any of these people? How about RFK being the psychopath? How would you know??

I have personal, intimate experience with psychopaths, in fact several. Not happy about it but have added it to my arsenal of God-given opportunities in dealing with what we are going through. In almost ALL instances, the psychopath have just about everyone fooled except for those closest to them. To those lucky few, they drop their mask every now & then, showing their evil interior. With that said, Trump is so wildly hated by the "other side" that I'd hardly tag him with that title. However, RFK Jr is an asshat for dropping that on our Prez. F him for that.

I think Trump is a person who speaks in code, cryptically. I've always read between the lines with him, as in during his first debates in 2015. He KNEW things and now it is obvious. The way it makes sense is to view this in the realm of military operation. As in Q. If this is, in fact, not what's happening, then Jesus truly is coming because we likely won't survive another few years of the NWO unfolding.

So, DO YOU SUPPORT TRUMP or don't you?

Expand full comment

Paul---I am sure I read that you worked at WHO!? If yes you must have a few tales to tell!?

Expand full comment

many

Expand full comment

I worked for WHO while with Trump and we were trying to do both...but WHO sought to hurt Trump and embarrass him...so I told them fuck off

Expand full comment

Thanks dr, Paul, for standing up to your character and not being bought out.

Expand full comment

https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/01/withdrawing-the-united-states-from-the-worldhealth-organization/

BUT

"(c) The Assistant to the President for National Security Affairs shall establish directorates and coordinating mechanisms within the National Security Council apparatus as he deems necessary and appropriate to safeguard public health and fortify biosecurity."

"(iii) identify credible and transparent United States and international partners to assume necessary activities previously undertaken by the WHO."

So worst-case will be same insanity but different name.

Expand full comment

Like your style ho ho ho!

Expand full comment