Once again AwakeNotWoke acts like Deep State, fomenting dissent. You really have to stop listening to this guy. He has you going in circles. Many of us have seen his true stripes for years now. You give him unneeded airplay. Move on from the guy. He's playing on your excitability. Stay focused and given Trump/Kennedy a chance. Deep State…
Once again AwakeNotWoke acts like Deep State, fomenting dissent. You really have to stop listening to this guy. He has you going in circles. Many of us have seen his true stripes for years now. You give him unneeded airplay. Move on from the guy. He's playing on your excitability. Stay focused and given Trump/Kennedy a chance. Deep State and Big Harma would love to drive a wedge there. Deep State doesn't go away because Trump sworn in. The Psyop attempts will continue. ANW is like arguing with the devil. He's in love with his self-important views, and works to bring dissent right out of the gate. You've been warned a few times, and he keeps using your natural passion for his own purposes. Read "Rules for Radicals" by Saul Alinsky. You'll then recognize some of the techniques taken to a new level.
you do not understand how ANW writes nor I. I have my own view. like you here ANW has freedom to post. I think it is provocative and interesting and good. Sherlock, it does not take a Sherlock to understand me. I fin it hilarious how some folk come here, not their stack, here, and tell me what to think, wrote etc. dont even show their faces...nor names. do I care what you think? no...do I like that you write here? of course. keep writing.
Doesn't matter if we meet someone in person. You yourself have shared many times how people you thought were decent during Trumps first turn turned out to not be what they appeared to be. People in the Freedom movement too. I, and others here, think you give him too much credence based upon his body of postings. Just pointing that out. I'm not directing policy or telling people what to conclude without looking at it themselves first. But as someone who was following the Breggins long before I discovered you, and got an early copy of their "Covid 19 and the Global Predators" manuscript before it was in book form, and paid for an early conference where they were one of the tier-1 guests, I'm telling you to be careful with ANW. Even the devil will use 90% truth to slip in 10% lies. Take the warning or not, but it seems he's getting more 'airplay' and some of us are concerned. Just as I've been concerned about the "reinvention of Robert Malone" for years. Malone is just slicker and better funded.
Seriously, the nerve of this asshole! I certainly don't need or want his, or whatever its pronouns are, respect. But he/she/it comes onto Paul's stack and starts trying to control him, telling him what to do and what not to do, finding fault and offering his/her/its gratuitous, unsolicited advice. You or I would never have such disrespect. When Paul wants an opinion on something he asks for it. This little Fauci saw an opportunity to both attack me and try to throw his/her/its weight around at Paul at the same time. He/she/it is like another "DS," the dip shit deep state Ukraine flag waver.
You get airplay dude and you clearly are attempting to direct policy and to tell Paul what to do despite your denial. Your call for censorship, which is essentially what it is, is reminiscent of Zuckerberg and Dorsey, both on the Horsemen List?
So, are you a Horseman, Sherlock? I am from a background, raised in it, more Right-wing than leftists like you can possibly imagine.
Actually, I'll tell you what you are. What you are is a Fauci, maybe not with exactly the same ideology on the shots, not exactly, but you are much like him. Fauci is a control freak, like you are a control freak. His control freakery is why he and many others like him mandated shots.
More precisely, Fauci has been called a "bureaucratic compulsive with narcissistic features." It's very similar to a psychopath, and it's possible to be both a psychopath and a compulsive, although psychopaths are undercontrollers and the Faucis of this world are overcontrollers. There's also what's been called a "puritanical compulsive with paranoid features." Only people who are paranoid would think I'm deep state. Could it be that you're paranoid and you have a "narcissistic epistemology" which means you are full of self-importance and believe your own brain farts? You have no concept of rival hypotheses. You think your thoughts are true just because you have them.
How can I say all of this about you and be so accurate? It's because I've seen YOUR body of postings. They say more about you than they do about me.
As regards the subject of this stack, which was about what I said, not about me, although you, with your love of sophistry and in particular argumentum ad hominem, decided to try to make it about me, and are receiving this treatment in return, are my premises true or false and is my reasoning sound?
The fact is, RFK Jr did say that Trump is a psychopath. The fact is, I said that was a dumb thing to do.
Trying to "one up" Paul on how you discovered the Breggens before you discovered him etc just makes you look full of yourself, as well as deluded, which, given that you think I'm deep state, you are.
Here's one of my prior postings on Paul's stack. Did this upset you Sherlock?
"[T]ake a deep dive into ICD-11 anankastic personality disorder, also known as "obsessive compulsive personality disorder (OCPD)" and in particular the subtype referred to by Theodore Millon, originator of the American Psychiatric Association's Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders' personality disorders (PD) classification, as "bureaucratic compulsive with narcissistic features."
Most of the health bureaucrats responsible for pushing the jabs appeark to be afflicted with it. Think of Fauci. It's believed to be the most common disorder of serial killers. Think of Hillary Clinton and Hitler. And Greta Thunberg. And serial killer Colonel Russell Williams. It's closely related to a subtype of sadism ("sadistic personality with compulsive features").
People with anankastic PD believe they know everything, are never wrong, and are morally superior. The vaxxed ones feel very superior to the unjabbed. They have "perspective taking deficits" and are functionally rigid, meaning they cannot recognize and correct for mistakes or modify their perspectives to take account of new data. They cannot be convinced they are wrong. They just get angry when confronted with evidence or proof that they are wrong. They just double down on their mistakes and order more jabs.
They're control freaks who feel justified in imposing their neurosis on others. There are even some who are anti-vaxx, although a lot more appear to be pro-vaxx. The anti-vaxx ones tend to have a subtype called "puritanical compulsive with paranoid features." On the upside, I suppose, they tend to dislike profanity and lazy people. They are also punctual and neat. Whatever their subtype, after disposing of a victim's body, they invariably clean their car so well it looks like it has been detailed. Academia is full of them as are cops and the higher ranks of the military.
Unfortunately, the health bureaucracy is also full of them. The majority of them love jabs so much they would glue themselves to the road, just like many of them do to protest carbon emissions, and would have no hesitation in preventing ambulances from getting patients to hospitals, if they thought doing so would increase jab uptake. Their cause is always more important in their eyes than the rights of others. They are very self righteous. "How dare you! How dare you not get a booster. How dare you use profanity. You have stolen my dreams ... etc"
Here's something I posted on the stack of one of Peter Breggen's colleagues, which earned me a "like" from the author:
"Many of these regulators are a classic case of ICD-11 Anankastic Personality Disorder aka Obsessive Compulsive Personality Disorder (OCPD) They're "musturbators." Their speech and thought patterns are full of "must," "should," "ought." They're functionally rigid. They pluck their "should rules" out of their ass ("everyone should get vaccinated" etc). They think they know everything and are never wrong.
They want to control other people. They think their way is the only right way. They have empathy and perspective-taking deficits. They can't be dissuaded by evidence. They're obsessed with morality and ethics but are quite unscrupulous ("forcing people to get vaccinated and telling lies for science is the morally right thing to do"). They rise to the top of regulatory bodies. They're also common in military leadership positions and in academia.
It's the disorder of tyrants. Hitler was a classic. It was impossible to persuade Hitler of his mistakes. Fauci is the same. Fauci's subtype is clearly Theodore Millon's "bureaucratic compulsive with narcissistic features." There are some on our side, oposed to the vax. They do the movement a great disservice. They are Faucis too, just with a different ideology."
Maybe it was this post, on Paul's stack, that upset you Sherlock:
"Malone is so boring. He may be full of himself but he refuses to double down on his mistakes and push the shots. Fauci, Walensky, Birx are where it's at:
'The bureaucratic compulsive displays signs of narcissistic traits alongside the compulsivity. They are champions of tradition, values, and bureaucracy. They cherish organizations that follow hierarchies and feel comforted by definitive roles between subordinates and superiors, and the known expectations and responsibilities. They derive their identity from work and project an image of diligence, reliability, and commitment to their institution. They view work and productivity in a polarized manner; either done or not. They may use their power and status to inflict fear and obedience in their subordinates if they do not strictly follow their rules and procedures, and derive pleasure from the sense of control and power that they acquire by doing so.' "
Once again AwakeNotWoke acts like Deep State, fomenting dissent. You really have to stop listening to this guy. He has you going in circles. Many of us have seen his true stripes for years now. You give him unneeded airplay. Move on from the guy. He's playing on your excitability. Stay focused and given Trump/Kennedy a chance. Deep State and Big Harma would love to drive a wedge there. Deep State doesn't go away because Trump sworn in. The Psyop attempts will continue. ANW is like arguing with the devil. He's in love with his self-important views, and works to bring dissent right out of the gate. You've been warned a few times, and he keeps using your natural passion for his own purposes. Read "Rules for Radicals" by Saul Alinsky. You'll then recognize some of the techniques taken to a new level.
you do not understand how ANW writes nor I. I have my own view. like you here ANW has freedom to post. I think it is provocative and interesting and good. Sherlock, it does not take a Sherlock to understand me. I fin it hilarious how some folk come here, not their stack, here, and tell me what to think, wrote etc. dont even show their faces...nor names. do I care what you think? no...do I like that you write here? of course. keep writing.
Doesn't matter if we meet someone in person. You yourself have shared many times how people you thought were decent during Trumps first turn turned out to not be what they appeared to be. People in the Freedom movement too. I, and others here, think you give him too much credence based upon his body of postings. Just pointing that out. I'm not directing policy or telling people what to conclude without looking at it themselves first. But as someone who was following the Breggins long before I discovered you, and got an early copy of their "Covid 19 and the Global Predators" manuscript before it was in book form, and paid for an early conference where they were one of the tier-1 guests, I'm telling you to be careful with ANW. Even the devil will use 90% truth to slip in 10% lies. Take the warning or not, but it seems he's getting more 'airplay' and some of us are concerned. Just as I've been concerned about the "reinvention of Robert Malone" for years. Malone is just slicker and better funded.
Respectfully, it's not a competition, Sherlock.
It's interesting to hear the viewpoints of others.
And, as I've suggested elsewhere, not everything that individuals post is meant to be taken literally.
Seriously, the nerve of this asshole! I certainly don't need or want his, or whatever its pronouns are, respect. But he/she/it comes onto Paul's stack and starts trying to control him, telling him what to do and what not to do, finding fault and offering his/her/its gratuitous, unsolicited advice. You or I would never have such disrespect. When Paul wants an opinion on something he asks for it. This little Fauci saw an opportunity to both attack me and try to throw his/her/its weight around at Paul at the same time. He/she/it is like another "DS," the dip shit deep state Ukraine flag waver.
You get airplay dude and you clearly are attempting to direct policy and to tell Paul what to do despite your denial. Your call for censorship, which is essentially what it is, is reminiscent of Zuckerberg and Dorsey, both on the Horsemen List?
So, are you a Horseman, Sherlock? I am from a background, raised in it, more Right-wing than leftists like you can possibly imagine.
Actually, I'll tell you what you are. What you are is a Fauci, maybe not with exactly the same ideology on the shots, not exactly, but you are much like him. Fauci is a control freak, like you are a control freak. His control freakery is why he and many others like him mandated shots.
More precisely, Fauci has been called a "bureaucratic compulsive with narcissistic features." It's very similar to a psychopath, and it's possible to be both a psychopath and a compulsive, although psychopaths are undercontrollers and the Faucis of this world are overcontrollers. There's also what's been called a "puritanical compulsive with paranoid features." Only people who are paranoid would think I'm deep state. Could it be that you're paranoid and you have a "narcissistic epistemology" which means you are full of self-importance and believe your own brain farts? You have no concept of rival hypotheses. You think your thoughts are true just because you have them.
How can I say all of this about you and be so accurate? It's because I've seen YOUR body of postings. They say more about you than they do about me.
As regards the subject of this stack, which was about what I said, not about me, although you, with your love of sophistry and in particular argumentum ad hominem, decided to try to make it about me, and are receiving this treatment in return, are my premises true or false and is my reasoning sound?
The fact is, RFK Jr did say that Trump is a psychopath. The fact is, I said that was a dumb thing to do.
Trying to "one up" Paul on how you discovered the Breggens before you discovered him etc just makes you look full of yourself, as well as deluded, which, given that you think I'm deep state, you are.
Fascinating how he, or whatever its pronouns are, arrogantly assumes that you have not read Alinsky's "Rules for Radicals."
nice post
Here's one of my prior postings on Paul's stack. Did this upset you Sherlock?
"[T]ake a deep dive into ICD-11 anankastic personality disorder, also known as "obsessive compulsive personality disorder (OCPD)" and in particular the subtype referred to by Theodore Millon, originator of the American Psychiatric Association's Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders' personality disorders (PD) classification, as "bureaucratic compulsive with narcissistic features."
Most of the health bureaucrats responsible for pushing the jabs appeark to be afflicted with it. Think of Fauci. It's believed to be the most common disorder of serial killers. Think of Hillary Clinton and Hitler. And Greta Thunberg. And serial killer Colonel Russell Williams. It's closely related to a subtype of sadism ("sadistic personality with compulsive features").
People with anankastic PD believe they know everything, are never wrong, and are morally superior. The vaxxed ones feel very superior to the unjabbed. They have "perspective taking deficits" and are functionally rigid, meaning they cannot recognize and correct for mistakes or modify their perspectives to take account of new data. They cannot be convinced they are wrong. They just get angry when confronted with evidence or proof that they are wrong. They just double down on their mistakes and order more jabs.
They're control freaks who feel justified in imposing their neurosis on others. There are even some who are anti-vaxx, although a lot more appear to be pro-vaxx. The anti-vaxx ones tend to have a subtype called "puritanical compulsive with paranoid features." On the upside, I suppose, they tend to dislike profanity and lazy people. They are also punctual and neat. Whatever their subtype, after disposing of a victim's body, they invariably clean their car so well it looks like it has been detailed. Academia is full of them as are cops and the higher ranks of the military.
Unfortunately, the health bureaucracy is also full of them. The majority of them love jabs so much they would glue themselves to the road, just like many of them do to protest carbon emissions, and would have no hesitation in preventing ambulances from getting patients to hospitals, if they thought doing so would increase jab uptake. Their cause is always more important in their eyes than the rights of others. They are very self righteous. "How dare you! How dare you not get a booster. How dare you use profanity. You have stolen my dreams ... etc"
Here's something I posted on the stack of one of Peter Breggen's colleagues, which earned me a "like" from the author:
"Many of these regulators are a classic case of ICD-11 Anankastic Personality Disorder aka Obsessive Compulsive Personality Disorder (OCPD) They're "musturbators." Their speech and thought patterns are full of "must," "should," "ought." They're functionally rigid. They pluck their "should rules" out of their ass ("everyone should get vaccinated" etc). They think they know everything and are never wrong.
They want to control other people. They think their way is the only right way. They have empathy and perspective-taking deficits. They can't be dissuaded by evidence. They're obsessed with morality and ethics but are quite unscrupulous ("forcing people to get vaccinated and telling lies for science is the morally right thing to do"). They rise to the top of regulatory bodies. They're also common in military leadership positions and in academia.
It's the disorder of tyrants. Hitler was a classic. It was impossible to persuade Hitler of his mistakes. Fauci is the same. Fauci's subtype is clearly Theodore Millon's "bureaucratic compulsive with narcissistic features." There are some on our side, oposed to the vax. They do the movement a great disservice. They are Faucis too, just with a different ideology."
Maybe it was this post, on Paul's stack, that upset you Sherlock:
"Malone is so boring. He may be full of himself but he refuses to double down on his mistakes and push the shots. Fauci, Walensky, Birx are where it's at:
'The bureaucratic compulsive displays signs of narcissistic traits alongside the compulsivity. They are champions of tradition, values, and bureaucracy. They cherish organizations that follow hierarchies and feel comforted by definitive roles between subordinates and superiors, and the known expectations and responsibilities. They derive their identity from work and project an image of diligence, reliability, and commitment to their institution. They view work and productivity in a polarized manner; either done or not. They may use their power and status to inflict fear and obedience in their subordinates if they do not strictly follow their rules and procedures, and derive pleasure from the sense of control and power that they acquire by doing so.' "