So I can say Kamala Harris is eligible to be POTUS and that question to be put to bed but there is and will always be a question & a good argument Obama was never eligible to be POTUS
And this is what has always been so infuriating. Obama was not eligible to be POTUS and no person and no group of people, no agency did a damn thing about it. And Obama is still running the country into the dirt.
boom...he was never eligible. she is...she is born on US soil...all questions end there. she may be an anchor baby if we wish to argue but that is not the issue, she is a natural born citizen...pure
Agree. Kamala was born on US soil but is NOT a natural born citizen by virtue of the fact that neither of her parents were born here (I don't think they were even naturalized citizens but not sure). Like you I find it infuriating that Congressmen and Senators who swear to uphold the US Constitution do not know it says AND worse, they are not tested on it upon entry to Congress. But if we could not convince anyone to understand the meaning of Natural Born Citizen for Obama, you know they won't do it for Kamala.
Not what the constitution says. She was born here, qualifies her to run. Doesn't matter where her parents were born and if they were US citizens or not.
There are several reasons why Kamala is not eligible to be President:
1. Being born on US soil was never a criterion for US citizenship until Justice Brennan put a conjecture about it in a footnote to a decision on whether the State of Texas had to provide education to the children of illegal immigrants. It has never been lawful or Constitutional.
2. The Constitutional requirement of' natural born citizen' was understood at that time to mean both parents were under the jurisdiction of the United States. As foreign students, neither of Kamala's parents satisfied this requirement.
3. Kamala is a Citizen of Jamaica through her father, per the Jamaican Constiturtion.
No dear Dr. She is native born, not natural born. You have to look at the great work 9f law at the time constitution written whose name I cannot recall right now.
Kamala is not eligible for EXACTLY the same reason that Obama was not eligible.
Though her parents were not US citizens at the time of her birth, making her ineligible. Barry’s mom was US citizen at the time of his birth, making him eligible--but only up to the point that she, with him in tow, relinquished her US citizenship to become an Indonesian citizen. At the moment she naturalized as an Indonesian citizen, little Barry became an Indonesian citizen, because the citizenship of a minor follows that of the custodial parent, allowing Lolo to marry her and to adopt little Barry as his own son.
At that point little Barry was in exactly the same position as Kamala. Her citizenship, regardless of where she was born, followed that of her custodial parent.
Later, she may or may not have undergone naturalization. But, in either case, she was and is ineligible both to serve as Vice President or as President.
Barry, later, may have undergone naturalization to regain his US citizenship, but whether or not he did, he was ineligible to become President.
That’s what all the hubbub was about in faking the missing birth certificate. NOT to prove he was a citizen by birth. Why? Because no matter where on the planet he was born, he was born to a woman with US citizenship, making him a US citizen. It was, rather, to draw attention away that once his mom because an Indonesian citizen, he did as well. So, either he is a naturalized Indonesian and not eligible for presidency or he later became a naturalized US citizen and is not eligible for the presidency--that is, in EXACTLY the same position as Kamala but by a slightly different route.
Since the Minor v Happersett decision there has NEVER been either a Constitutional amendment changing the requirement for being elected President or a bill passed by Congress and signed into law conferring citizenship by the accident of having been born within US territory.
The Minor v Happersett decision is still the controlling definition.
It doesn’t make any difference what people believe to the contrary. That was always the plan of the socialists even back in the days of Minor v Happersett, to be able to vastly inflate they own voting rolls by ad hoc definitions entirely lacking a basis in law.
1. Has there been a Constitutional amendment declaring “natural born” to mean “physically dropped down the chute within US territory?”
No.
2. Has there been any law passed before Kamala arrived ex utero squalling and shitting herself on US shores stating that?
No.
3. Has there been any law passed since Kamala’s birth stating that?
No.
4. Has there been any law passed stating that all naturalized citizens had the same rights to run for President as natural born citizens?
No. And that would require a Constitutional amendment.
5. Has there been any law passed stating that and applying it to all prior births in an ex post facto manner?
No. And even if their had been, it would be unconstitutional on its face because of the Constitutional prohibition of ex post facto laws.
Could some Supreme Court justice have mentioned in his writings sometime in the 20th century that he believed touching down on US territory conferred US citizenship?
Probably. But that’s merely his opinion and has no force of law. If hundreds of millions of people shared that opinion, it would still be an opinion with no force of law.
What makes the Minor v Happersett decision the defining legal opinion on the subject?
Because it was deciding a case about having suffrage as a consequence of citizenship. The court very carefully delineated in the context of what the Founders understood those terms regarding the ways US citizenship was acquired to mean when framing the Constitution. It was easy enough to discover. That done, other questions could be asked and answered.
Was US citizenship required to be able to vote?
Yes.
Was US citizenship was sufficient in and of itself to guarantee suffrage?
No. It was not. All children born to US citizen parents were US citizens, but they did not have the right to vote. They had to reach adulthood as specified by the Constitution.
Was the plaintiff in the case a US citizen?
Yes.
Was she an adult US citizen?
Yes.
Was she entitled to vote according to the requirements in the US Constitution?
No, she was not because she was not male.
The justices said that they answered the question posed to them within the letter of the law. That was all they could do. It was not within their purview to alter the Constitution no matter what people believed to the contrary. They said a means existed to do that which was the amendment process.
The Constitution was amended to give adult female US citizens the right to vote.
In the same way, the opinion of many people at large cannot substitute for an amendment to the Constitution--why? Because that kind of stuff was EXACTLY why an amendment was required.
I thought she was born in Canada? I really do not care where the hyena was born, she is the most unintelligent human alive. I think Trump and Vance will pulverize her in any debate! There has to be a debate!
Is that in the US now? I think it was 60 years ago, but I could make a case that Portland, SF, Oakland, and great portions of Seattle (my wife has a lovely aunt who lives there) are definitely not anymore—didn’t they kinda seceded with that autonomous zone declaration?
At what point in time did Congress begin neglecting its duty to certify candidates for office, including presidential and vice-presidential candidates?
At what point in time was the oath of office neutered? Was it ever a functioning oath?
Why have lower courts with activist judges been allowed to define US citizenship? … To the point that individuals like Kamala Harris are now recognized as “natural born” citizens? (She is not, no matter what the fact checkers say.)
Was the 14th Amendment amended when we weren’t looking?
At what point was the definition of “natural born citizen” redefined by the Supreme Court?
Challenging eligibility has proven to be an intractable issue due to standing. States are the only entities with standing to challenge anything. There are exactly 50 potential plaintiffs.
You as an individual don't vote for President, your state chooses electors, who do the actual voting.
Carefully watch her state filings and if the do or do not include the phrase "constitutionally eligible". Obama did not include this in any state, with the exception of Hawaii. That will be interesting to watch.
Obama was a criminal fraud from the 1st day. Being in Florida, I remember well the ACORN scandal that got Obama "elected". All fraud ... all stolen ... just like Biden. No accountability; no prison.
In addition to that, her father was a teacher of Marxist economics, and both her parents were protesters aka "trouble makers", and all those colleges in CA such as UC Berkley and UC Davis are famous for spawning marxist ideals.
The Reason your parents Must Be Citizens for you to be a natural born citizen is to Prevent Foreigners from coming into our country and usurping our Constitution, Bill of Rights and Declaration of Independence. It's bad enough that Obama was able to lie his way through the usurption and takeover of our government and try to throw our Constitution in the trash and create his own laws, and now with AI our internet is being hi-jacked by marxists and eugenecists and operation mockingbird to change and delete information and documents on the internet. You know...like replacing fake bought and paid for science for true peer reviewed documented science that has held true each and every time it was applied.
Her parents were foreign born and her father was a marxist, so as you know... the apple doesn't fall far from the tree. (and she doesn't Even qualify to be VP)
Sorry Doc, but you are dead wrong. A natural born citizen is like a three legged stool. Take away a single leg and the stool falls over. So natural born is conferred by fulfilling 2 principals: 1. Jus soli "of the soil" 2. Jus sanguin "of the blood" So it was understood that any person who is born on the soil of citizen PARENTS that's plural. Both parents are citizens at the time of birth. And you are born on the SOIL. That's 3 legs 1. mom 2. dad 3. on the soil. Pull any one of those legs and boom your stool falls over. You may be born A Citizen but you are not natural born. Period!
Example 1. John McCain
The Senate Resolution declaring John McCain a Natural Born Citizen declares exactly what I just said. The Senate new and covered their asses.
Senate Bill 511
110th CONGRESS
2d Session
S. RES. 511
IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES
April 10, 2008
Mrs. McCaskill (for herself, Mr. Leahy, Mr. Obama, Mr. Coburn, Mrs. Clinton, and Mr. Webb) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary
April 24, 2008
Reported by Mr. Leahy, without amendment
April 30, 2008
Considered and agreed to
RESOLUTION
Recognizing that John Sidney McCain, III, is a natural born citizen.
Whereas the Constitution of the United States requires that, to be eligible for the Office of the President, a person must be a natural born Citizen of the United States;
Whereas the term natural born Citizen, as that term appears in Article II, Section 1, is not defined in the Constitution of the United States;
Whereas there is no evidence of the intention of the Framers or any Congress to limit the constitutional rights of children born to Americans serving in the military nor to prevent those children from serving as their country’s President;
Whereas such limitations would be inconsistent with the purpose and intent of the natural born Citizen clause of the Constitution of the United States, as evidenced by the First Congress's own statute defining the term natural born Citizen;
Whereas the well-being of all citizens of the United States is preserved and enhanced by the men and women who are assigned to serve our country outside of our national borders;
Whereas previous presidential candidates were born outside of the United States of America and were understood to be eligible to be President; and
Whereas John Sidney McCain, III, was born to American citizens on an American military base in the Panama Canal Zone in 1936: Now, therefore, be it
That John Sidney McCain, III, is a natural born Citizen under Article II, Section 1, of the Constitution of the United States.
As you can see it clearly states in the next to last paragraph:
Whereas John Sydney McCain, III was born to American CITIZENS (that's both parents = 2 legs) on an American military base (American military bases and Embassies are considered sovereign soil leg 3 ) so etc etc John McCain is a Natural Born Citizen.
The Senate spelled out the rules that have always been and after all the bs posturing declared the truth that NBC is born on sovereign soil to citizen parents.
Why wasn't such a resolution givenn declaring Barak Hussein Soetoro as such?
Example 2
Mittens Romney's father George tried running for Potus. He had to withdraw because it was discovered that he was born in Mexico to US Citizen PARENTS. His parents who were citizens and Mormons fled to Mexico because polygamy was against the law and he escaped to Mexico to avoid the law. That's where George was born and so he wasn't a Natural Born Citizen therefore ineligible.
And he DROPPED out to avoid a Constitutional crisis. Period.
Example 3
Adolph Hitler and Eva Braun come to the US to attend college they have a baby while here and leave the US when college is done and go back to Germany to build the 3rd Reich. After little Adolph junior grows up he leaves Germany and returns to the US sporting his US birth certificate
and resides here 14 years. He's over 35 are you telling me he's a Natural Born Citizen? He may born a citizen (anchor baby at best like Kamala) but natural born? No effing way.
Doc they invented the Covid playbook when they used the same tactics against the "Birthers" when Bathhouse Barry ran. If they censor you, discredit you, fire you, call you a racist, deplatform you, threaten you etc etc you can bet you're right just like covid. Don't be fooled. The NBC clause is in one of the first remember it was created to prevent English royalty from simply coming to the US and having a kid who runs for Potus. In fact thats why it says 35 years old and 14 years on the soil. Do the math. There were very few ways to get a high quality education so the new Americans were sending their children back to Europe for their education where they would come under the influence of the Crown and their relatives. So the founders used 14 years as the time it took to wash the stain of influence off their foreign educated natural born children. So you finish College at 21 +/- add 14 years to wash away the stains of foreign influence of the Crown bingo you're 35. Or older.
You're dead wrong doc. The various Constitutional amendments that get cited had nothing whatsoever to do with the requirements to run for Potus to change the requirements would require that the Supreme Court would rule specifically about the definition of NBC which they have never ever done. Or 2 a Constitutional amendment specifically changing or defining what NBC is. None of these things ever happened.
Take a hint Doc. Don't declare things you don't understand.
Natural born is an inoculation against foreign influence that is 3 shots in one
Mom, dad, soil, nothing short of that stands. It gives the natural born child 2 generations of citizenship to stand on.
Wrong. Natural Born citizen requires 2 citizen parents and born on the land. Barry and that Texas republican senator neither are qualified. Kameltoe had 0 citizen parents so is NOT qualified.
Question if a person is born in a territory such as Puerto Rico, Northern Mariana Islands, U.S. Virgin Islands, American Samoa, District of Columbia, Guam, United States Minor Outlying Islands Pacific Ocean (Baker Island, Howland Island, Jarvis Island, Johnston Atoll, Kingman Reef, Midway Atoll, Palmyra Atoll, and Wake Island) and one in the Caribbean Sea (Navassa Island). Would that be considered United States soil to be citizen of it. Voting rights are a different issue. Thinking outside of the box I apologize for not staying on course of her citizenship or his.
Linda, I agree with you. It must not be foreigners with screwed up ideology or fantasy of some vision of nuttiness. Look at the one guy giving out tampons to males for free and female must purchase, it should be given to female free unfair, even platform.
Yes, I like what you said. The tampon ma needs a bunch of those stuffed into his mouth. This perversion is to try and screw up our children Before they can be taught what is right and what is Godly and natural, along with some rules to prevent mistakes and errors.
And this is what has always been so infuriating. Obama was not eligible to be POTUS and no person and no group of people, no agency did a damn thing about it. And Obama is still running the country into the dirt.
boom...he was never eligible. she is...she is born on US soil...all questions end there. she may be an anchor baby if we wish to argue but that is not the issue, she is a natural born citizen...pure
Paul,
How come citizens are not understanding NATURAL BORN CITIZEN at this late date?
LAW OF NATIONS mentioned in our Constitution is where you find the the definition of NATURAL BORN CITIZEN…
The following 2 pieces explain this fundamental concept and why Kamala is absolutely not eligible…
https://newswithviews.com/natural-born-citizen-clause-still-ignored/
https://newswithviews.com/trump-must-challenge-harris-eligibility/
I dare you all to study these 2 pieces!
Agree. Kamala was born on US soil but is NOT a natural born citizen by virtue of the fact that neither of her parents were born here (I don't think they were even naturalized citizens but not sure). Like you I find it infuriating that Congressmen and Senators who swear to uphold the US Constitution do not know it says AND worse, they are not tested on it upon entry to Congress. But if we could not convince anyone to understand the meaning of Natural Born Citizen for Obama, you know they won't do it for Kamala.
They were imm8grants at the time of her birth. She can hold a Jamaican passport if she wan5s
Not what the constitution says. She was born here, qualifies her to run. Doesn't matter where her parents were born and if they were US citizens or not.
I will study them right away. Thank you.. 🇺🇸🙌🏻
There are several reasons why Kamala is not eligible to be President:
1. Being born on US soil was never a criterion for US citizenship until Justice Brennan put a conjecture about it in a footnote to a decision on whether the State of Texas had to provide education to the children of illegal immigrants. It has never been lawful or Constitutional.
2. The Constitutional requirement of' natural born citizen' was understood at that time to mean both parents were under the jurisdiction of the United States. As foreign students, neither of Kamala's parents satisfied this requirement.
3. Kamala is a Citizen of Jamaica through her father, per the Jamaican Constiturtion.
Harvard Law says parents must be citizens...hers were not.
https://harvardlawreview.org/forum/vol-128/on-the-meaning-of-natural-born-citizen/
No dear Dr. She is native born, not natural born. You have to look at the great work 9f law at the time constitution written whose name I cannot recall right now.
You sir are absolutely wrong.
Kamala is not eligible for EXACTLY the same reason that Obama was not eligible.
Though her parents were not US citizens at the time of her birth, making her ineligible. Barry’s mom was US citizen at the time of his birth, making him eligible--but only up to the point that she, with him in tow, relinquished her US citizenship to become an Indonesian citizen. At the moment she naturalized as an Indonesian citizen, little Barry became an Indonesian citizen, because the citizenship of a minor follows that of the custodial parent, allowing Lolo to marry her and to adopt little Barry as his own son.
At that point little Barry was in exactly the same position as Kamala. Her citizenship, regardless of where she was born, followed that of her custodial parent.
Later, she may or may not have undergone naturalization. But, in either case, she was and is ineligible both to serve as Vice President or as President.
Barry, later, may have undergone naturalization to regain his US citizenship, but whether or not he did, he was ineligible to become President.
That’s what all the hubbub was about in faking the missing birth certificate. NOT to prove he was a citizen by birth. Why? Because no matter where on the planet he was born, he was born to a woman with US citizenship, making him a US citizen. It was, rather, to draw attention away that once his mom because an Indonesian citizen, he did as well. So, either he is a naturalized Indonesian and not eligible for presidency or he later became a naturalized US citizen and is not eligible for the presidency--that is, in EXACTLY the same position as Kamala but by a slightly different route.
Since the Minor v Happersett decision there has NEVER been either a Constitutional amendment changing the requirement for being elected President or a bill passed by Congress and signed into law conferring citizenship by the accident of having been born within US territory.
The Minor v Happersett decision is still the controlling definition.
It doesn’t make any difference what people believe to the contrary. That was always the plan of the socialists even back in the days of Minor v Happersett, to be able to vastly inflate they own voting rolls by ad hoc definitions entirely lacking a basis in law.
And that some people believe that their belief that they are members of the opposite gender makes them doesn’t change the reality that they are not.
It’s really easy:
1. Has there been a Constitutional amendment declaring “natural born” to mean “physically dropped down the chute within US territory?”
No.
2. Has there been any law passed before Kamala arrived ex utero squalling and shitting herself on US shores stating that?
No.
3. Has there been any law passed since Kamala’s birth stating that?
No.
4. Has there been any law passed stating that all naturalized citizens had the same rights to run for President as natural born citizens?
No. And that would require a Constitutional amendment.
5. Has there been any law passed stating that and applying it to all prior births in an ex post facto manner?
No. And even if their had been, it would be unconstitutional on its face because of the Constitutional prohibition of ex post facto laws.
Could some Supreme Court justice have mentioned in his writings sometime in the 20th century that he believed touching down on US territory conferred US citizenship?
Probably. But that’s merely his opinion and has no force of law. If hundreds of millions of people shared that opinion, it would still be an opinion with no force of law.
What makes the Minor v Happersett decision the defining legal opinion on the subject?
Because it was deciding a case about having suffrage as a consequence of citizenship. The court very carefully delineated in the context of what the Founders understood those terms regarding the ways US citizenship was acquired to mean when framing the Constitution. It was easy enough to discover. That done, other questions could be asked and answered.
Was US citizenship required to be able to vote?
Yes.
Was US citizenship was sufficient in and of itself to guarantee suffrage?
No. It was not. All children born to US citizen parents were US citizens, but they did not have the right to vote. They had to reach adulthood as specified by the Constitution.
Was the plaintiff in the case a US citizen?
Yes.
Was she an adult US citizen?
Yes.
Was she entitled to vote according to the requirements in the US Constitution?
No, she was not because she was not male.
The justices said that they answered the question posed to them within the letter of the law. That was all they could do. It was not within their purview to alter the Constitution no matter what people believed to the contrary. They said a means existed to do that which was the amendment process.
The Constitution was amended to give adult female US citizens the right to vote.
In the same way, the opinion of many people at large cannot substitute for an amendment to the Constitution--why? Because that kind of stuff was EXACTLY why an amendment was required.
Wow, an impressive piece thank you!
And bring millions into the US to blur our constitution’s value by ignoring it
I thought she was born in Canada? I really do not care where the hyena was born, she is the most unintelligent human alive. I think Trump and Vance will pulverize her in any debate! There has to be a debate!
you are too funny
Debating before voting.
She was born in Oakland, California.
yes
Is that in the US now? I think it was 60 years ago, but I could make a case that Portland, SF, Oakland, and great portions of Seattle (my wife has a lovely aunt who lives there) are definitely not anymore—didn’t they kinda seceded with that autonomous zone declaration?
At what point in time did Congress begin neglecting its duty to certify candidates for office, including presidential and vice-presidential candidates?
At what point in time was the oath of office neutered? Was it ever a functioning oath?
Why have lower courts with activist judges been allowed to define US citizenship? … To the point that individuals like Kamala Harris are now recognized as “natural born” citizens? (She is not, no matter what the fact checkers say.)
Was the 14th Amendment amended when we weren’t looking?
At what point was the definition of “natural born citizen” redefined by the Supreme Court?
Challenging eligibility has proven to be an intractable issue due to standing. States are the only entities with standing to challenge anything. There are exactly 50 potential plaintiffs.
You as an individual don't vote for President, your state chooses electors, who do the actual voting.
Carefully watch her state filings and if the do or do not include the phrase "constitutionally eligible". Obama did not include this in any state, with the exception of Hawaii. That will be interesting to watch.
very excellent sharing
You are incorrect. Kamala is not a Natural Born Citizen. She is an anchor baby born on U. S. soil to foreigners. Read your Constitution excerpt again.
Kamala is ineligible to be President should Biden be removed and certainly is ineligible to run for President.
Obama was a criminal fraud from the 1st day. Being in Florida, I remember well the ACORN scandal that got Obama "elected". All fraud ... all stolen ... just like Biden. No accountability; no prison.
Sorry but no. Research NATURAL BORN as outlined by contemporaries of Constitution. Natural Born, both parents MUST BE CITIZENS OF USA. On USA soil.
We'd better Read this page from Harvard Law ... https://harvardlawreview.org/forum/vol-128/on-the-meaning-of-natural-born-citizen/
Neither of Kamala's parents were citizens of the United States so she then is Not a natural born citizen.
Meaning she wasn't even eligible to be VP. This is how cheaters cheat. They just figure everyone's too dumb to notice.
In addition to that, her father was a teacher of Marxist economics, and both her parents were protesters aka "trouble makers", and all those colleges in CA such as UC Berkley and UC Davis are famous for spawning marxist ideals.
https://people.com/all-about-kamala-harris-parents-donald-harris-shyamala-gopalan-7974352
She is *not* eligible as she is not a “natural born citizen,” meaning a child born in the US of two citizen parents, as defined by the Supreme Court and the 14th Amendment. There were no “anchor babies” when she was born, and there shouldn’t be now. https://www.thepostemail.com/2009/10/18/4-supreme-court-cases-define-natural-born-citizen/
I respectfully disagree. And here's why: https://grumpyrabbit.substack.com/p/the-constitutional-meaning-of-natural
The Reason your parents Must Be Citizens for you to be a natural born citizen is to Prevent Foreigners from coming into our country and usurping our Constitution, Bill of Rights and Declaration of Independence. It's bad enough that Obama was able to lie his way through the usurption and takeover of our government and try to throw our Constitution in the trash and create his own laws, and now with AI our internet is being hi-jacked by marxists and eugenecists and operation mockingbird to change and delete information and documents on the internet. You know...like replacing fake bought and paid for science for true peer reviewed documented science that has held true each and every time it was applied.
Her parents were foreign born and her father was a marxist, so as you know... the apple doesn't fall far from the tree. (and she doesn't Even qualify to be VP)
Sorry Doc, but you are dead wrong. A natural born citizen is like a three legged stool. Take away a single leg and the stool falls over. So natural born is conferred by fulfilling 2 principals: 1. Jus soli "of the soil" 2. Jus sanguin "of the blood" So it was understood that any person who is born on the soil of citizen PARENTS that's plural. Both parents are citizens at the time of birth. And you are born on the SOIL. That's 3 legs 1. mom 2. dad 3. on the soil. Pull any one of those legs and boom your stool falls over. You may be born A Citizen but you are not natural born. Period!
Example 1. John McCain
The Senate Resolution declaring John McCain a Natural Born Citizen declares exactly what I just said. The Senate new and covered their asses.
Senate Bill 511
110th CONGRESS
2d Session
S. RES. 511
IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES
April 10, 2008
Mrs. McCaskill (for herself, Mr. Leahy, Mr. Obama, Mr. Coburn, Mrs. Clinton, and Mr. Webb) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary
April 24, 2008
Reported by Mr. Leahy, without amendment
April 30, 2008
Considered and agreed to
RESOLUTION
Recognizing that John Sidney McCain, III, is a natural born citizen.
Whereas the Constitution of the United States requires that, to be eligible for the Office of the President, a person must be a natural born Citizen of the United States;
Whereas the term natural born Citizen, as that term appears in Article II, Section 1, is not defined in the Constitution of the United States;
Whereas there is no evidence of the intention of the Framers or any Congress to limit the constitutional rights of children born to Americans serving in the military nor to prevent those children from serving as their country’s President;
Whereas such limitations would be inconsistent with the purpose and intent of the natural born Citizen clause of the Constitution of the United States, as evidenced by the First Congress's own statute defining the term natural born Citizen;
Whereas the well-being of all citizens of the United States is preserved and enhanced by the men and women who are assigned to serve our country outside of our national borders;
Whereas previous presidential candidates were born outside of the United States of America and were understood to be eligible to be President; and
Whereas John Sidney McCain, III, was born to American citizens on an American military base in the Panama Canal Zone in 1936: Now, therefore, be it
That John Sidney McCain, III, is a natural born Citizen under Article II, Section 1, of the Constitution of the United States.
As you can see it clearly states in the next to last paragraph:
Whereas John Sydney McCain, III was born to American CITIZENS (that's both parents = 2 legs) on an American military base (American military bases and Embassies are considered sovereign soil leg 3 ) so etc etc John McCain is a Natural Born Citizen.
The Senate spelled out the rules that have always been and after all the bs posturing declared the truth that NBC is born on sovereign soil to citizen parents.
Why wasn't such a resolution givenn declaring Barak Hussein Soetoro as such?
Example 2
Mittens Romney's father George tried running for Potus. He had to withdraw because it was discovered that he was born in Mexico to US Citizen PARENTS. His parents who were citizens and Mormons fled to Mexico because polygamy was against the law and he escaped to Mexico to avoid the law. That's where George was born and so he wasn't a Natural Born Citizen therefore ineligible.
And he DROPPED out to avoid a Constitutional crisis. Period.
Example 3
Adolph Hitler and Eva Braun come to the US to attend college they have a baby while here and leave the US when college is done and go back to Germany to build the 3rd Reich. After little Adolph junior grows up he leaves Germany and returns to the US sporting his US birth certificate
and resides here 14 years. He's over 35 are you telling me he's a Natural Born Citizen? He may born a citizen (anchor baby at best like Kamala) but natural born? No effing way.
Doc they invented the Covid playbook when they used the same tactics against the "Birthers" when Bathhouse Barry ran. If they censor you, discredit you, fire you, call you a racist, deplatform you, threaten you etc etc you can bet you're right just like covid. Don't be fooled. The NBC clause is in one of the first remember it was created to prevent English royalty from simply coming to the US and having a kid who runs for Potus. In fact thats why it says 35 years old and 14 years on the soil. Do the math. There were very few ways to get a high quality education so the new Americans were sending their children back to Europe for their education where they would come under the influence of the Crown and their relatives. So the founders used 14 years as the time it took to wash the stain of influence off their foreign educated natural born children. So you finish College at 21 +/- add 14 years to wash away the stains of foreign influence of the Crown bingo you're 35. Or older.
You're dead wrong doc. The various Constitutional amendments that get cited had nothing whatsoever to do with the requirements to run for Potus to change the requirements would require that the Supreme Court would rule specifically about the definition of NBC which they have never ever done. Or 2 a Constitutional amendment specifically changing or defining what NBC is. None of these things ever happened.
Take a hint Doc. Don't declare things you don't understand.
Natural born is an inoculation against foreign influence that is 3 shots in one
Mom, dad, soil, nothing short of that stands. It gives the natural born child 2 generations of citizenship to stand on.
Paul and all,
How come citizens are not understanding NATURAL BORN CITIZEN at this late date?
LAW OF NATIONS mentioned in our Constitution is where you find the the definition of NATURAL BORN CITIZEN…
The following 2 pieces explain this fundamental concept and why Kamala is absolutely not eligible…
https://newswithviews.com/natural-born-citizen-clause-still-ignored/
https://newswithviews.com/trump-must-challenge-harris-eligibility/
I dare you all to study these 2 pieces!
Wrong. Natural Born citizen requires 2 citizen parents and born on the land. Barry and that Texas republican senator neither are qualified. Kameltoe had 0 citizen parents so is NOT qualified.
https://beforeitsnews.com/obama-birthplace-controversy/2010/11/the-framers-used-emer-de-vattel-not-william-blackstone-to-define-a-natural-born-citizen-246418.html
https://www.constitution.org/2-Authors/vattel/vattel-01.htm
Question if a person is born in a territory such as Puerto Rico, Northern Mariana Islands, U.S. Virgin Islands, American Samoa, District of Columbia, Guam, United States Minor Outlying Islands Pacific Ocean (Baker Island, Howland Island, Jarvis Island, Johnston Atoll, Kingman Reef, Midway Atoll, Palmyra Atoll, and Wake Island) and one in the Caribbean Sea (Navassa Island). Would that be considered United States soil to be citizen of it. Voting rights are a different issue. Thinking outside of the box I apologize for not staying on course of her citizenship or his.
Well I do know that the 6 square miles of District of Columbia is Foreign Territory. At least that is what I've found to be true...and so much more.
This is why we cannot elect foreigners with marxist idealogues And MUST Restore OUR Constitutional Republic.
Linda, I agree with you. It must not be foreigners with screwed up ideology or fantasy of some vision of nuttiness. Look at the one guy giving out tampons to males for free and female must purchase, it should be given to female free unfair, even platform.
Yes, I like what you said. The tampon ma needs a bunch of those stuffed into his mouth. This perversion is to try and screw up our children Before they can be taught what is right and what is Godly and natural, along with some rules to prevent mistakes and errors.
Yeah, still do not like her.