Sorry, your Deep State skirt is showing again. The most unpopular VP pick of all time was Kacklin herself. I don't need "Never Trumper" talking points. I predicted what would happen 3 years ago when I said Biden would not be the nominee, and that his replacement was be 'super awesome!' to the media, not matter who it was, because that is…
Sorry, your Deep State skirt is showing again. The most unpopular VP pick of all time was Kacklin herself. I don't need "Never Trumper" talking points. I predicted what would happen 3 years ago when I said Biden would not be the nominee, and that his replacement was be 'super awesome!' to the media, not matter who it was, because that is what the media does for its Deep State masters. And from that they would say, "Look our new candidate has 'energized' us" and they would use that as a 'plausible deniability' tactic for aircover for Cheat 2.0 in November. Don't be simp. Now we get morons saying Tulsi or Rubio or some other either non-conservative, or someone with ties to large military-industrial complex donations has to be our VP or we lose. Not buying it. The majority of Americans when it comes to abortion actually want limits on it. Just fact. And, if the Supreme Court were ever to grow an actual set, they would rule that the unborn have as much a right to life as you or I based on natural law alone. Then the Court would say, "If people believe strongly in abortion, they can work through the Constitutional amendment process to get abortion enshrined in the Constitution." Guess what? IT WOULD NEVER PASS. That is the dirty secret, and why even the nutburger Planned Parenthood eugenics types never go down that path. The more educated people become on what abortion actually is, the more people are won to the pro-life side. Just facts. So stop with the thinking that we have to support baby killing and be Democrat-lite to win. Buck up and grow a pair.
It's your WEF, islamist sympathizing skirt that's showing. Rather than getting the Fake News buzzing about Trump's picks, annnouncing a cabinet pick every week gives the Fake News more targets to attack. And you know it. It risks backfiring as badly as picking Vance has done. Picking Vance has not bolstered the base in the swing states as it was intended to. Your WEF Young Global Leader mentee is actually less popular in the swing states than he is nationally, where he's also losing the center. Trump has said regarding abortion, and I quote, "Republicans must also win elections." Americans do favor limits on abortion, but most support the same exceptions Trump proposes. Few, apart from the likes of you, believe that white, or no-white, American women should be forced to carry and give birth to the progeny of islamists who come in through the southern border and rape them. In terms of population genetics, raping and impregregnating American women, and then forcing the woman to carry the third world islamist's baby, and giving the islamists a further foothold in the US, as you would propose, makes sense for islamists but it is not in the interests of Americans. I don't want the Dems to weaponize this argument, but if they're politically astute they will. Just believing your own propaganda does not win elections. Yes, Gabbard was a Democrat like Trump and Reagan and so picking her to ensure Trump wins, as the bookmakers predict he would with her as his VP nominees, would be impure. Only the impotent are pure and you are impotent. You are pushing for an Obama fourth term. That's your WEF and islamicist sympathizer agenda. You don't hide it well.
Dude, you can't get away with it a second time. Nobody wants Deep Staters like you around any more. Trump and Vance are going to clean house. If Trump is sworn in Jan 2025, you can count on at least 8 years of dismantlement of the Deep State wet dreams. Sorry. You lose.
Sorry, your Deep State skirt is showing again. The most unpopular VP pick of all time was Kacklin herself. I don't need "Never Trumper" talking points. I predicted what would happen 3 years ago when I said Biden would not be the nominee, and that his replacement was be 'super awesome!' to the media, not matter who it was, because that is what the media does for its Deep State masters. And from that they would say, "Look our new candidate has 'energized' us" and they would use that as a 'plausible deniability' tactic for aircover for Cheat 2.0 in November. Don't be simp. Now we get morons saying Tulsi or Rubio or some other either non-conservative, or someone with ties to large military-industrial complex donations has to be our VP or we lose. Not buying it. The majority of Americans when it comes to abortion actually want limits on it. Just fact. And, if the Supreme Court were ever to grow an actual set, they would rule that the unborn have as much a right to life as you or I based on natural law alone. Then the Court would say, "If people believe strongly in abortion, they can work through the Constitutional amendment process to get abortion enshrined in the Constitution." Guess what? IT WOULD NEVER PASS. That is the dirty secret, and why even the nutburger Planned Parenthood eugenics types never go down that path. The more educated people become on what abortion actually is, the more people are won to the pro-life side. Just facts. So stop with the thinking that we have to support baby killing and be Democrat-lite to win. Buck up and grow a pair.
It's your WEF, islamist sympathizing skirt that's showing. Rather than getting the Fake News buzzing about Trump's picks, annnouncing a cabinet pick every week gives the Fake News more targets to attack. And you know it. It risks backfiring as badly as picking Vance has done. Picking Vance has not bolstered the base in the swing states as it was intended to. Your WEF Young Global Leader mentee is actually less popular in the swing states than he is nationally, where he's also losing the center. Trump has said regarding abortion, and I quote, "Republicans must also win elections." Americans do favor limits on abortion, but most support the same exceptions Trump proposes. Few, apart from the likes of you, believe that white, or no-white, American women should be forced to carry and give birth to the progeny of islamists who come in through the southern border and rape them. In terms of population genetics, raping and impregregnating American women, and then forcing the woman to carry the third world islamist's baby, and giving the islamists a further foothold in the US, as you would propose, makes sense for islamists but it is not in the interests of Americans. I don't want the Dems to weaponize this argument, but if they're politically astute they will. Just believing your own propaganda does not win elections. Yes, Gabbard was a Democrat like Trump and Reagan and so picking her to ensure Trump wins, as the bookmakers predict he would with her as his VP nominees, would be impure. Only the impotent are pure and you are impotent. You are pushing for an Obama fourth term. That's your WEF and islamicist sympathizer agenda. You don't hide it well.
Dude, you can't get away with it a second time. Nobody wants Deep Staters like you around any more. Trump and Vance are going to clean house. If Trump is sworn in Jan 2025, you can count on at least 8 years of dismantlement of the Deep State wet dreams. Sorry. You lose.