MALONE is & was a BULLY on Ruby & Breggin & whomever, he chilled scientific debate with his threats & suits; his lackies say he may sue me, I say, BRING IT ON, ROBERTO, I WILL RETURN it to you FRAUD
Agreed. My father is a psychopath. A man who destroyed everything, even his own family, eventually. Malone reminds me of my 'dear old dad'.
All strength to Jane Ruby and the Breggins. Malone used the legal system to pull them into his psychopathic orbit. Been there, done that. They'll need all the strength they can muster.
Damn. Almost like some of you had been saying that for a few years now.
You mean DARPA darling Malone potentially could be a false prophet being used by his handlers as controlled opposition to slow walk the inevitable “whoops, we didn’t FORCE YOU, it was free will. No refunds!”
Two years ago you and a few others called this man out. Just saying 😉
I held back when writing that article. I already knew he was evil and doing much harm by then, but wanted to hold back to see where it would all go. And sure went worse with this Malone disinfo agent.
Curious to know your opinion of those who "walk" with or behind (idk) malone (can not capitalize his name - when I have no respect for him). Edward Dowd, Dr. Meryl Nass, Steve Kirsch, Dr. Ryan Cole, Del Bigtree , etc.
Dr. Ryan Cole was also one of the first to talk about the dangers of these shots. I was surprised to learn how he's so tied to malone. Edward Dowd is tied to malone, too. It's hard to figure out why. Same with Meryl Nass. She seems ok most of the time but why would she be tied to malone? Del Bigtree seems to be ok as well but he also seems to be colleagues with malone.
I am questioning these other people’s motives too ? I have been a firm supporter of Del Bigtree’s ICAN . He introduced many of us to these people by interviewing the on his Highwire show. He himself at first seemed untrusting of Malone but that changed rapidly to praising him many times on his show. I wonder if these other people will speak of the loss that Malone suffered or his reasoning for pursuing such an egregious lawsuit ?
Has Meryl Nass written any hit pieces on you after your posts on Malone? When I discovered he wanted to test Anthrax vaccines on other people's kids in 2011 (discussion where coincidentally Meryl Nass participated via phone - what are the chances?) she published a vile, racist hit piece on me. I was advised by a researcher that Meryl had visited Cuba and had an affinity for Fidel Castro and the Black Panthers - confirmed by her and news reports. I reciprocated by publishing said reports. Same for Malone and his race pimping for Obama when he lived in Georgia. There are connections with some of these Progressives within the MFM and Communism- I will publish the data as my schedule allows.
I don't know "who is Robert Malone." But his lawsuits speak volumes. And unrecognized by many in the MFM, so does his support of Desmet, whom the Breggins rightly took to task for his pseudo-psychology that masks the conspiracy.
I read that “Narcissist” and “Psychopath” were removed this year from the DSM Psychiatry book? I was shocked but wondered if it had anything to do with the covid perpetrators resenting being outed!😂
DSM 5 was published in 2013. There is not a yearly update. There is a "text revision" (DSM 5TR) published in 2022 that reflects only one new diagnostic listing, that of "prolonged grief disorder". Most of the changes are minor and do not remove diagnostic categories. The changes mostly deal with language pertaining to social issues such as racism, discrimination, language, and culture.
"Schema therapy is currently being tested in 103 forensic patients with ASPD, BPD, NPD, or PPD at seven forensic psychiatric hospitals in The Netherlands. Nearly all of the patients are violent offenders with high levels of recidivism risk atthe beginning of the study. An unusual feature of this study is that about 50% of the patients have high levels of psychopathy ... [It would be interesting to see the outcome of this study.] ... A 7-year case study of the first psychopathic patient to be treated with schema therapy, the patient showed significant reductions in recidivism risk and psychopathic symptoms and improvements in early maladative schemas and coping skills. At 3-year posttreatment followup, he had not recidivated, was continuously employed, and wasliving with his wife and their child." Livesley, W. J., & Larstone, R. (Eds.). (2018). Handbook of personality disorders: Theory, research, and treatment (2nd ed.). The Guilford Press.
Do you feel its true many high level officials in politics and govt could be labeled Narcissists, Psychopaths or Sociopaths? Billionaires, are they just lucky or furiously aggressive? Would you say many of them are diagnosable with any of these?
Hitler's label is, in ICD terms, "Anankastic Personality Disorder," or, in terms used mostly by Americans, "Obsessive Compulsive Personality Disorder (OCPD)." OCPD think they know everything, are always right and have a right to control you. They get angry if you disagree with them. They double down on their mistakes. They're often worse than psychopaths. OCPD is the most common PD of serial killers. The subtypes are interesting.
"Bureaucratic compulsive with narcissistic features" is a label that accurately descibes many of the jab pushers, and jab mandaters, and also some in the medical freedom movement:
"The bureaucratic compulsive displays signs of narcissistic traits alongside the compulsivity. They are champions of tradition, values, and bureaucracy. They cherish organizations that follow hierarchies and feel comforted by definitive roles between subordinates and superiors, and the known expectations and responsibilities. They derive their identity from work and project an image of diligence, reliability, and commitment to their institution. They view work and productivity in a polarized manner; either done or not. They may use their power and status to inflict fear and obedience in their subordinates if they do not strictly follow their rules and procedures, and derive pleasure from the sense of control and power that they acquire by doing so."
In the medical freedom movement, a label that describes some is "Putitanical compulsive with paranoid features." They get upset if you use profanity.
"They have strong internal impulses that are countered vociferously through the use of religion. They are constantly battling their impulses and sexual drives, which they view as irrational. They attempt to purify and pacify the urges by adopting a cold and detached lifestyle. They create an enemy which they use to vent their hostility, such as "non-believers", or "lazy people". They are patronizing, bigoted, and zealous in their attitude toward others. Their beliefs are polarized into "good" and "evil"."
So people were catastrophizing about Malone for nothing. There was never anything to be concerned about with his lawsuits. At most, he exploited the "any publicity is good publicity" angle, playing his critics like a violin. The critics enhanced his profile and played into his hands. But the concerns were always all just bedwetting and hyperventilating. Malone's lawsuits were always not going to go anywhere.
Must disagree. SLAPP suits are a tool that has been used for decades to shut opposition down and silence truth and public discourse on important issues.
Yes but plaintiffs typically don't win these suits and Malone's was no exception. Also, Malone's suit galvanized opposition and shone a spotlight on it and Malone's case.
Even as far back as the 1980s I saw these suits mess up people's lives, even losing their homes in debilitating costs. It is hard to go against the Big Guys with their deep pockets.
No one should have to sacrifice their lives and primary civic/public/political/moral goals in order to fight Free Speech Suppressors like Malone.
Even before he filed those suits, it was obvious something was peculiar about Malone and the way he just appeared on Rogan's show out of 'nowhere', eclipsing all others in the health freedom fight, and then be given the center stage at many events by those he eclipsed. Totally peculiar. Before long, surely, we still would have been up-to-speed on such a character's peculiar instantaneous public relations power.
In sensible jurisdictions, costs are awarded against the perpetrators. Malone will probably have costs awarded against him. He was never going to win, legally. But he has won in the sense that he's got a lot of publicity for his own, and Desmet's, positions.
Paying for costs NEVER makes up for the pain and suffering of the defendant in struggling to pay legal fees in the first place. SLAPP suits are a two-pronged weapon -- financial burden and psychological stress.
I think what Malone accomplished via a SLAPP suit was sending an INTIMIDATION message -- intimidating anyone else from criticizing him or shining a spotlight on his background and whatever else he might not want scrutinized.
Lucky for us that Dr. Alexander was not intimidated, and provided us access to the ongoing details and a platform for the issues. Bless him!
It's doubtful they'd agree that he had no case, ever? If he had no case there was no real danger, only imaginary danger.However, it would have been stressful for Dr Jane and the Breggins because they overestimated the threat from.Malone and underestimated their coping abilities. I hope they countersue him.
Bobby and Malone are both CIA/big pharma puppets!!!!
Proof? They are buddies and both never screamed for us to have open/free access to ivermectin!!! They are frauds duping us!!!!
They are both paid agitators/disrupters! That’s why Malone sued everyone and Bobby is running as a vote splitter. Limited hangouts in a way offering distraction and steering thoughts to the way the government wants you to think.
@R U Kidding me: Neither are clinicians. One is not even an MD. Perhaps they didn’t feel they had adequate expertise to weigh in on that issue. Rather than criticize I agree with their silence, and respect them for staying in their lane. They knew that there were other physicians who had taken on this issue and were much more qualified to deal with it.
Well RFK isn't a scientist, either, but he feels free to speak out strongly against CO2 catastrophe. The only problem is, there isn't one.
So what bothers me is this: say RFK gets the presidency because he's one of us. Fine. But then suppose "the science" comes out-- the science that Bobby swears is real-- and it says we're at major tipping points and have literally (according to models) only two years to turn the tide? Then presto, we have 15-minute cities, monitoring and managing of our carbon footprints (which pretty much means everything we do) and the Great Reset comes in through the back door.
People aren't asking Bobby the right questions, and the right questions are: is the science on CO2 catastrophe like the official science on Covid, and why or why not, and do you believe the science on CO2 catastrophe is sound, and if you do, then what would you do if all of "the science" was in agreement that we had to work urgently and use "EUA" to stem the tide of CO2 catastrophe?
I predict that Bobby would waffle on answering these questions, and too many wouldn't hold his feet to the fire to get answers.
Bobby Kennedy is NOT "one of us". He was born and raised to be a creature of the swamp. He's found his little niche and expects it to take him to the White House but there is way too much wrong with the man both personally and politically to make him an acceptable candidate for President. He is no leader of men. I would go so far as to use the word grifter (ala Obama, IYKWIM)
I can't look into Bobby's soul. Many people in the MFM who've met him believe he's sincere.
I say that key questions about him haven't been answered, and my fear is that he might be a Trojan Horse candidate whose policies unleash the longed-for Great Reset.
I get more or less the same feel from him that I got from Obama. Like an iceberg, there's a visible part (well managed and crafted by RFK Jr to convey what he wishes us to believe about him with regard to his fitness for the office of the presidency) ...and then there's the much much larger part hidden from view. He's a politician to the core and like many of the Kennedy's, hungers for power.
Excellent description of Bobby. Never forget he's a Dem through and through. Iceberg with 90% below the surface, absolutely. Promise 'em the world, give 'em CBDC. Give 'em environmental extremes, never hear him talking about the real issues. I bet he's talked with Schwab before.
Malone recommended Pepcid and taurine and whatever with his fake DOMANE program so to sound all official.
Bobby has back peddled on all his vax stances and basically says they are mostly safe!!! He has CHD and access to tons of doctors. He used to preach about anti vax and list all the side effects but now you are crying he is not an MD? Lmao.
They are both frauds protecting the government and big pharma. Covid was a DOD/CIA/China operation. And Bobby just wasted time writing another book bashing Fauci and the same players when the real decision makers are in the DOD!!!
Some would look for a 'correction' and an apology from the sued party.
But Malone sought $25,000,000.00 from Ruby & Beggins = $50 or $75,000,000.00
And it was a groundless case that caused a great deal of stress on people who doing God's work to minimise the damage of mRNA tech which he claims he is inventor of....
That's a shameful situation and shreds his 'reputation' such as it is.
This is a huge relief as being sued is no fun and huge drain on one.
If readers / commenters can summarize the problem with Malone -- a thing or two that he did to justify this opprobrium -- I think others new to this would appreciate it. Wow do not know all the players.
The first thing Malone did was to sue Dr. Breggin and others for defamation, because they criticized Malone. Breggin has been writing and testifying against harmful psychiatric drugs for decades, long before Malone got into the game. Breggin was also one of the first to call out the Covid conspiracy. So Malone was doing this to someone whom big pharma and the censorship/industrial complex would love to sue themselves.
One of the key bones of contention in the lawsuit was over Mattias Desmet's psychology, and here's a crash course in that: Demset in a nutshell says there was no overarching conspiracy during Covid and that we, the people, in essence did it to ourselves because of our propensity for "mechanistic thinking." Breggin-- and many others, including myself-- attacked Desmet for this and by implication or direct naming, Malone himself.
Desmet is wrong. His subject was totalitarianism (in his book) and his contention is that totalitarianism arises from our mechanistic thinking, whereas it should be clear that totalitarianism has its origin in massive censorship/propaganda (e.g., see Naomi Wolf's recent substack: https://naomiwolf.substack.com/p/dailyclout-wholly-erased-all-at-once)
So two things really got people wondering who is Robert Malone, and the two are related:
1. Lawsuit against Breggin and others
2. Support for Desmet
So keep in mind, if totalitarianism begins in censorship/propaganda, and if Malone through his lawsuits attempted to censor views opposed to his own, then wouldn't Malone be part of the totalitarian campaign??? Not saying he is, but there it is ....
You mean, totalitarianism as a result of propaganda as well as the isolation of the masses? If so, then my view is that Desmet creates a fiction when we says that we've become isolated and lonely people, ripe for mass formation. I don't see it. I don't see it where I live, and I've not experienced that in my life. Sure, some people are lonely-- this is an eternal truth. But most people have important and deep ties to friends and family. In order for his theory to work, Desmet has to pretend that we are indeed a society with a decent portion of lonely and fragmented souls.
Desmet gets the cart before the horse. The massive propaganda and censorship during Covid caused the mass formation, they didn't arise in tandem. The fear was created, deliberately, but Desmet wants to pretend that this fear rose up more-or-less spontaneously, it just needed a trigger.
Hopefully this chips away some of his followers who worship him like a god. And, hopefully it will loosen the tongues of those who were afraid to speak against him. His polished teddy bear farmer persona with a morning dj voice may be finally wearing thin.
Im happy for Jane but she constantly bashes so many doctors and others in her "coffee chats" I was banned by her for asking her why she does those things, it sounds petty. Malone can go home now and lick his wounds, hes nothing but a fraud.
She's bashed Dr Peter McCulloch, Dr Paul Alexander and the Wellness Company, she's bashed so many good people Im surprised she can find guests for her show anymore. I find her to be petty, jealous and down right mean, it's as if she hates anyone who is doing better than her financially or in the media. I know the list of bashed people is very long but I think she's a shallow sad human being who needs to go away, she was fired by Stew Peters too. Yes, Sasha has a wealth of information and she's great. Oh Jane ever bashed Karen Kingston of all people.
I agree I’m not quite sure of her. She seems very jealous of anyone who has info besides herself. I like some of the guests she brings but I absolutely hate her attitude.
Why didn't Malone spent all that lawyer money in leading a class action against social media censoring him and all of us? At least he would have done something real for the cause!
Ha! Ha!! Ya’ll should have seen the first production of The Great Awakening by Mikki Willis, He initially had Maloney baloney in a scene surrounded by beautiful scantily clad women. He was wearing a robe, slouched in a chair, in a lounge of some sort, smoking a cigar. It was the most stupid scene, but truly showed Malone’s narcissism & Mikki’s mistake. Thankfully, the scene was taken out of the final production! But I saw the initial review, & was rather disgusted. Had NOTHING to do with The Great Awakening.! I never liked Malone. He looks like the fraud he is. Thanks for helping develop the bio weapon used against us Malone. And contributing to mass genocide. Really appreciate it.
Yeah, blame Einstein for the Nuclear Bomb. There's a difference between knowledge and application. Sometimes when I read comments like yours, I think Klaus Schwab is right. Everybody's right sometimes.
Malone is a malignant narcissist and controlled opposition. This is fantastic news.
BOOM
Agreed. My father is a psychopath. A man who destroyed everything, even his own family, eventually. Malone reminds me of my 'dear old dad'.
All strength to Jane Ruby and the Breggins. Malone used the legal system to pull them into his psychopathic orbit. Been there, done that. They'll need all the strength they can muster.
It would be weird if Malone shares the same genes as your dad. Even unrelated people can be genetically similar.
Hope your dad is not a mason:
The REAL Robert Malone
https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/the-real-robert-malone
No but he encouraged me to become one.
Did you follow his advise?
No but I sometimes wonder if I made a mistake.
Damn. Almost like some of you had been saying that for a few years now.
You mean DARPA darling Malone potentially could be a false prophet being used by his handlers as controlled opposition to slow walk the inevitable “whoops, we didn’t FORCE YOU, it was free will. No refunds!”
Two years ago you and a few others called this man out. Just saying 😉
https://www.2ndsmartestguyintheworld.com/p/thoughts-on-dr-robert-malones-debt?utm_source=substack&utm_campaign=post_embed&utm_medium=web
I held back when writing that article. I already knew he was evil and doing much harm by then, but wanted to hold back to see where it would all go. And sure went worse with this Malone disinfo agent.
Curious to know your opinion of those who "walk" with or behind (idk) malone (can not capitalize his name - when I have no respect for him). Edward Dowd, Dr. Meryl Nass, Steve Kirsch, Dr. Ryan Cole, Del Bigtree , etc.
Dr. Ryan Cole was also one of the first to talk about the dangers of these shots. I was surprised to learn how he's so tied to malone. Edward Dowd is tied to malone, too. It's hard to figure out why. Same with Meryl Nass. She seems ok most of the time but why would she be tied to malone? Del Bigtree seems to be ok as well but he also seems to be colleagues with malone.
I am questioning these other people’s motives too ? I have been a firm supporter of Del Bigtree’s ICAN . He introduced many of us to these people by interviewing the on his Highwire show. He himself at first seemed untrusting of Malone but that changed rapidly to praising him many times on his show. I wonder if these other people will speak of the loss that Malone suffered or his reasoning for pursuing such an egregious lawsuit ?
ditto
You did a good job. At the time he was the pied piper. Few other good warning you wrote as well about him.
Let’s not speak too ill of the man. He likes to sue folks on the “same team”.
Has Meryl Nass written any hit pieces on you after your posts on Malone? When I discovered he wanted to test Anthrax vaccines on other people's kids in 2011 (discussion where coincidentally Meryl Nass participated via phone - what are the chances?) she published a vile, racist hit piece on me. I was advised by a researcher that Meryl had visited Cuba and had an affinity for Fidel Castro and the Black Panthers - confirmed by her and news reports. I reciprocated by publishing said reports. Same for Malone and his race pimping for Obama when he lived in Georgia. There are connections with some of these Progressives within the MFM and Communism- I will publish the data as my schedule allows.
Mal one.
I don't know "who is Robert Malone." But his lawsuits speak volumes. And unrecognized by many in the MFM, so does his support of Desmet, whom the Breggins rightly took to task for his pseudo-psychology that masks the conspiracy.
I read that “Narcissist” and “Psychopath” were removed this year from the DSM Psychiatry book? I was shocked but wondered if it had anything to do with the covid perpetrators resenting being outed!😂
Are you serious about those words being removed? Very strange if that's the case.
DSM 5 was published in 2013. There is not a yearly update. There is a "text revision" (DSM 5TR) published in 2022 that reflects only one new diagnostic listing, that of "prolonged grief disorder". Most of the changes are minor and do not remove diagnostic categories. The changes mostly deal with language pertaining to social issues such as racism, discrimination, language, and culture.
Did they add “woke” ideology? Does it say created by govts to tyrannize their people?
Glad to know its not true that they removed those two diagnosis although both have no cure from what I understand nor treatable.
There is no cure for any of the Cluster B personality disorders.
These include: antisocial, borderline, histrionic, and narcissistic personality disorders.
Psychopath falls under the antisocial category.
Some success can be had with treatment of the Cluster A and C disorders.
"Schema therapy is currently being tested in 103 forensic patients with ASPD, BPD, NPD, or PPD at seven forensic psychiatric hospitals in The Netherlands. Nearly all of the patients are violent offenders with high levels of recidivism risk atthe beginning of the study. An unusual feature of this study is that about 50% of the patients have high levels of psychopathy ... [It would be interesting to see the outcome of this study.] ... A 7-year case study of the first psychopathic patient to be treated with schema therapy, the patient showed significant reductions in recidivism risk and psychopathic symptoms and improvements in early maladative schemas and coping skills. At 3-year posttreatment followup, he had not recidivated, was continuously employed, and wasliving with his wife and their child." Livesley, W. J., & Larstone, R. (Eds.). (2018). Handbook of personality disorders: Theory, research, and treatment (2nd ed.). The Guilford Press.
Do you feel its true many high level officials in politics and govt could be labeled Narcissists, Psychopaths or Sociopaths? Billionaires, are they just lucky or furiously aggressive? Would you say many of them are diagnosable with any of these?
I would, yes. Outstanding among them is Obama. He has instantly recognizable characteristics, detectable even before he speaks a word.
Hitler's label is, in ICD terms, "Anankastic Personality Disorder," or, in terms used mostly by Americans, "Obsessive Compulsive Personality Disorder (OCPD)." OCPD think they know everything, are always right and have a right to control you. They get angry if you disagree with them. They double down on their mistakes. They're often worse than psychopaths. OCPD is the most common PD of serial killers. The subtypes are interesting.
"Bureaucratic compulsive with narcissistic features" is a label that accurately descibes many of the jab pushers, and jab mandaters, and also some in the medical freedom movement:
"The bureaucratic compulsive displays signs of narcissistic traits alongside the compulsivity. They are champions of tradition, values, and bureaucracy. They cherish organizations that follow hierarchies and feel comforted by definitive roles between subordinates and superiors, and the known expectations and responsibilities. They derive their identity from work and project an image of diligence, reliability, and commitment to their institution. They view work and productivity in a polarized manner; either done or not. They may use their power and status to inflict fear and obedience in their subordinates if they do not strictly follow their rules and procedures, and derive pleasure from the sense of control and power that they acquire by doing so."
In the medical freedom movement, a label that describes some is "Putitanical compulsive with paranoid features." They get upset if you use profanity.
"They have strong internal impulses that are countered vociferously through the use of religion. They are constantly battling their impulses and sexual drives, which they view as irrational. They attempt to purify and pacify the urges by adopting a cold and detached lifestyle. They create an enemy which they use to vent their hostility, such as "non-believers", or "lazy people". They are patronizing, bigoted, and zealous in their attitude toward others. Their beliefs are polarized into "good" and "evil"."
So people were catastrophizing about Malone for nothing. There was never anything to be concerned about with his lawsuits. At most, he exploited the "any publicity is good publicity" angle, playing his critics like a violin. The critics enhanced his profile and played into his hands. But the concerns were always all just bedwetting and hyperventilating. Malone's lawsuits were always not going to go anywhere.
Must disagree. SLAPP suits are a tool that has been used for decades to shut opposition down and silence truth and public discourse on important issues.
Yes but plaintiffs typically don't win these suits and Malone's was no exception. Also, Malone's suit galvanized opposition and shone a spotlight on it and Malone's case.
Even as far back as the 1980s I saw these suits mess up people's lives, even losing their homes in debilitating costs. It is hard to go against the Big Guys with their deep pockets.
No one should have to sacrifice their lives and primary civic/public/political/moral goals in order to fight Free Speech Suppressors like Malone.
Even before he filed those suits, it was obvious something was peculiar about Malone and the way he just appeared on Rogan's show out of 'nowhere', eclipsing all others in the health freedom fight, and then be given the center stage at many events by those he eclipsed. Totally peculiar. Before long, surely, we still would have been up-to-speed on such a character's peculiar instantaneous public relations power.
In sensible jurisdictions, costs are awarded against the perpetrators. Malone will probably have costs awarded against him. He was never going to win, legally. But he has won in the sense that he's got a lot of publicity for his own, and Desmet's, positions.
Paying for costs NEVER makes up for the pain and suffering of the defendant in struggling to pay legal fees in the first place. SLAPP suits are a two-pronged weapon -- financial burden and psychological stress.
I think what Malone accomplished via a SLAPP suit was sending an INTIMIDATION message -- intimidating anyone else from criticizing him or shining a spotlight on his background and whatever else he might not want scrutinized.
Lucky for us that Dr. Alexander was not intimidated, and provided us access to the ongoing details and a platform for the issues. Bless him!
nup, it's a mystery- not, IMHO it's flushed out those consumed/controlled with fear.
bought and sold
Doubtful Dr Jane and the Breggins, their family, their friends, and followers would agree
It's doubtful they'd agree that he had no case, ever? If he had no case there was no real danger, only imaginary danger.However, it would have been stressful for Dr Jane and the Breggins because they overestimated the threat from.Malone and underestimated their coping abilities. I hope they countersue him.
Phony Maloney... been outed!
Well said!!!
Bobby is not the real deal!!!
Bobby and Malone are both CIA/big pharma puppets!!!!
Proof? They are buddies and both never screamed for us to have open/free access to ivermectin!!! They are frauds duping us!!!!
They are both paid agitators/disrupters! That’s why Malone sued everyone and Bobby is running as a vote splitter. Limited hangouts in a way offering distraction and steering thoughts to the way the government wants you to think.
👆 100%
@R U Kidding me: Neither are clinicians. One is not even an MD. Perhaps they didn’t feel they had adequate expertise to weigh in on that issue. Rather than criticize I agree with their silence, and respect them for staying in their lane. They knew that there were other physicians who had taken on this issue and were much more qualified to deal with it.
Well RFK isn't a scientist, either, but he feels free to speak out strongly against CO2 catastrophe. The only problem is, there isn't one.
So what bothers me is this: say RFK gets the presidency because he's one of us. Fine. But then suppose "the science" comes out-- the science that Bobby swears is real-- and it says we're at major tipping points and have literally (according to models) only two years to turn the tide? Then presto, we have 15-minute cities, monitoring and managing of our carbon footprints (which pretty much means everything we do) and the Great Reset comes in through the back door.
People aren't asking Bobby the right questions, and the right questions are: is the science on CO2 catastrophe like the official science on Covid, and why or why not, and do you believe the science on CO2 catastrophe is sound, and if you do, then what would you do if all of "the science" was in agreement that we had to work urgently and use "EUA" to stem the tide of CO2 catastrophe?
I predict that Bobby would waffle on answering these questions, and too many wouldn't hold his feet to the fire to get answers.
Bobby Kennedy is NOT "one of us". He was born and raised to be a creature of the swamp. He's found his little niche and expects it to take him to the White House but there is way too much wrong with the man both personally and politically to make him an acceptable candidate for President. He is no leader of men. I would go so far as to use the word grifter (ala Obama, IYKWIM)
I can't look into Bobby's soul. Many people in the MFM who've met him believe he's sincere.
I say that key questions about him haven't been answered, and my fear is that he might be a Trojan Horse candidate whose policies unleash the longed-for Great Reset.
I get more or less the same feel from him that I got from Obama. Like an iceberg, there's a visible part (well managed and crafted by RFK Jr to convey what he wishes us to believe about him with regard to his fitness for the office of the presidency) ...and then there's the much much larger part hidden from view. He's a politician to the core and like many of the Kennedy's, hungers for power.
Excellent description of Bobby. Never forget he's a Dem through and through. Iceberg with 90% below the surface, absolutely. Promise 'em the world, give 'em CBDC. Give 'em environmental extremes, never hear him talking about the real issues. I bet he's talked with Schwab before.
Good grief. Are you a paid troll?
Malone recommended Pepcid and taurine and whatever with his fake DOMANE program so to sound all official.
Bobby has back peddled on all his vax stances and basically says they are mostly safe!!! He has CHD and access to tons of doctors. He used to preach about anti vax and list all the side effects but now you are crying he is not an MD? Lmao.
They are both frauds protecting the government and big pharma. Covid was a DOD/CIA/China operation. And Bobby just wasted time writing another book bashing Fauci and the same players when the real decision makers are in the DOD!!!
Some would look for a 'correction' and an apology from the sued party.
But Malone sought $25,000,000.00 from Ruby & Beggins = $50 or $75,000,000.00
And it was a groundless case that caused a great deal of stress on people who doing God's work to minimise the damage of mRNA tech which he claims he is inventor of....
That's a shameful situation and shreds his 'reputation' such as it is.
This is a huge relief as being sued is no fun and huge drain on one.
This is great news!!!!!!!
Dr. Jane and the Breggins for the win! 👏
Bravo!!! Dr Alexander, can you clone yourself ? That would be awesome.
If readers / commenters can summarize the problem with Malone -- a thing or two that he did to justify this opprobrium -- I think others new to this would appreciate it. Wow do not know all the players.
I hate to say it but many of us called this. Malone blew up out of no where. I’m of the belief he was forced upon us as a gatekeeper
Sure. Little late to the party but no worries
https://georgewebb.substack.com/p/ten-questions-for-bob-malone-about-8dd
This article is behind a paywall, unfortunately.
Oh so it is.
To be fair, check in on ol’ George. He’s been on Malone for a long time.
If you’d asked two years ago, I’d had multiple links but not anymore.
https://twitter.com/RealGeorgeWebb1/status/1661992349726044167
The first thing Malone did was to sue Dr. Breggin and others for defamation, because they criticized Malone. Breggin has been writing and testifying against harmful psychiatric drugs for decades, long before Malone got into the game. Breggin was also one of the first to call out the Covid conspiracy. So Malone was doing this to someone whom big pharma and the censorship/industrial complex would love to sue themselves.
One of the key bones of contention in the lawsuit was over Mattias Desmet's psychology, and here's a crash course in that: Demset in a nutshell says there was no overarching conspiracy during Covid and that we, the people, in essence did it to ourselves because of our propensity for "mechanistic thinking." Breggin-- and many others, including myself-- attacked Desmet for this and by implication or direct naming, Malone himself.
Desmet is wrong. His subject was totalitarianism (in his book) and his contention is that totalitarianism arises from our mechanistic thinking, whereas it should be clear that totalitarianism has its origin in massive censorship/propaganda (e.g., see Naomi Wolf's recent substack: https://naomiwolf.substack.com/p/dailyclout-wholly-erased-all-at-once)
So two things really got people wondering who is Robert Malone, and the two are related:
1. Lawsuit against Breggin and others
2. Support for Desmet
So keep in mind, if totalitarianism begins in censorship/propaganda, and if Malone through his lawsuits attempted to censor views opposed to his own, then wouldn't Malone be part of the totalitarian campaign??? Not saying he is, but there it is ....
Two things can be right at the same time!
You mean, totalitarianism as a result of propaganda as well as the isolation of the masses? If so, then my view is that Desmet creates a fiction when we says that we've become isolated and lonely people, ripe for mass formation. I don't see it. I don't see it where I live, and I've not experienced that in my life. Sure, some people are lonely-- this is an eternal truth. But most people have important and deep ties to friends and family. In order for his theory to work, Desmet has to pretend that we are indeed a society with a decent portion of lonely and fragmented souls.
Desmet gets the cart before the horse. The massive propaganda and censorship during Covid caused the mass formation, they didn't arise in tandem. The fear was created, deliberately, but Desmet wants to pretend that this fear rose up more-or-less spontaneously, it just needed a trigger.
Hopefully this chips away some of his followers who worship him like a god. And, hopefully it will loosen the tongues of those who were afraid to speak against him. His polished teddy bear farmer persona with a morning dj voice may be finally wearing thin.
Im happy for Jane but she constantly bashes so many doctors and others in her "coffee chats" I was banned by her for asking her why she does those things, it sounds petty. Malone can go home now and lick his wounds, hes nothing but a fraud.
Agree! She bashed Sasha Latypova then next thing I saw she was on her show...🤔 strange
I love Latypova! She comes with a wealth of knowledge and one hell of a “Physicians Directive”! Made my attorney look stupid🤣🤣
She's bashed Dr Peter McCulloch, Dr Paul Alexander and the Wellness Company, she's bashed so many good people Im surprised she can find guests for her show anymore. I find her to be petty, jealous and down right mean, it's as if she hates anyone who is doing better than her financially or in the media. I know the list of bashed people is very long but I think she's a shallow sad human being who needs to go away, she was fired by Stew Peters too. Yes, Sasha has a wealth of information and she's great. Oh Jane ever bashed Karen Kingston of all people.
I agree I’m not quite sure of her. She seems very jealous of anyone who has info besides herself. I like some of the guests she brings but I absolutely hate her attitude.
Right, she's awful.
Yes. She’s a big banner. I don’t like that
How's Dr. Expert Inventor going to play this? I got my popcorn out.
He’s not. Too many Q type idiots think he’s the messiah.
Why didn't Malone spent all that lawyer money in leading a class action against social media censoring him and all of us? At least he would have done something real for the cause!
The REAL Robert Malone
https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/the-real-robert-malone
Now that should tell you everything you need to know👍👍
Good job. Keep up the good work Dr Alexander
Maloney !!! 🤣😂🤣
What they ^ said.
Ha! Ha!! Ya’ll should have seen the first production of The Great Awakening by Mikki Willis, He initially had Maloney baloney in a scene surrounded by beautiful scantily clad women. He was wearing a robe, slouched in a chair, in a lounge of some sort, smoking a cigar. It was the most stupid scene, but truly showed Malone’s narcissism & Mikki’s mistake. Thankfully, the scene was taken out of the final production! But I saw the initial review, & was rather disgusted. Had NOTHING to do with The Great Awakening.! I never liked Malone. He looks like the fraud he is. Thanks for helping develop the bio weapon used against us Malone. And contributing to mass genocide. Really appreciate it.
Yeah, blame Einstein for the Nuclear Bomb. There's a difference between knowledge and application. Sometimes when I read comments like yours, I think Klaus Schwab is right. Everybody's right sometimes.
🖕🏼