It is good to see that SECDEF reached a rational decision quickly. That he could do proves that he pases every risk analysis.
This is,amazing because I was told yesterday, on authority, whether or not good, from a troll who appeared to be missing a few neurons, that Hegseth could pass in each one of the multiple domains of RISK assessment…
It is good to see that SECDEF reached a rational decision quickly. That he could do proves that he pases every risk analysis.
This is,amazing because I was told yesterday, on authority, whether or not good, from a troll who appeared to be missing a few neurons, that Hegseth could pass in each one of the multiple domains of RISK assessment that America's adversaries almost certainly conduct on their own troops.
Based on the principle that the best predictor of future behavior is past behavior, the troll assessed that the RISK of organic impairment from past, repeated consumption of alcohol on multiple occasions to brown out level BAL = ZERO.
He/she, whatever its pronouns are, also assessed that the risk of inebriation on duty for someone with a history of brown out level drinking is also the same as that of President Trump, who is a teetotaller, i.e. = ZERO.
Risk of undiagnosed physiological dependence = ZERO.
Risk of relapse after recovery = ZERO.
Risk of loss of impulse control from past brown out = ZERO
and so on
That troll should work for China. Actually, he/she/it probably does
It is good to see that SECDEF reached a rational decision quickly. That he could do proves that he pases every risk analysis.
This is,amazing because I was told yesterday, on authority, whether or not good, from a troll who appeared to be missing a few neurons, that Hegseth could pass in each one of the multiple domains of RISK assessment that America's adversaries almost certainly conduct on their own troops.
Based on the principle that the best predictor of future behavior is past behavior, the troll assessed that the RISK of organic impairment from past, repeated consumption of alcohol on multiple occasions to brown out level BAL = ZERO.
He/she, whatever its pronouns are, also assessed that the risk of inebriation on duty for someone with a history of brown out level drinking is also the same as that of President Trump, who is a teetotaller, i.e. = ZERO.
Risk of undiagnosed physiological dependence = ZERO.
Risk of relapse after recovery = ZERO.
Risk of loss of impulse control from past brown out = ZERO
and so on
That troll should work for China. Actually, he/she/it probably does