I place 95+% (Very few spoke up early on about the risk of harm, importance of rejecting the PCR tests and the jab.) of the blame at the feet of the medical community who should have pushed back very hard against this EUA "vaccine". In April or May 2020 they should have read the animal studies done on the mRNA technology for SARS-Cov-1 (…
I place 95+% (Very few spoke up early on about the risk of harm, importance of rejecting the PCR tests and the jab.) of the blame at the feet of the medical community who should have pushed back very hard against this EUA "vaccine". In April or May 2020 they should have read the animal studies done on the mRNA technology for SARS-Cov-1 (initial SARS) and later MERS. 4+ weeks after the lab animals were "vaccinated", they were exposed to the wild virus. They all became severely ill or died. Both times the tests were halted. As you noted above, at that time there were discussions about antibody dependent enhancement (ADE). Immunology 101 makes it obvious the focus on the second line of immune response meant that the injected would spread the disease. Such a disgrace to their Hippocratic Oath!! Mostly, they refuse to evaluate the increase illnesses we have seen since the roll out to determine the cause and to rule them out as a side effect of the jabs, instead passing them off as just part of today's lifestyle which appears to me as a group think CYA professional decision. Thanks to the few critical thinking physicians and medical scientists, the data will continue to become stronger and at some point in the future, they will have to face the REAL medical science!
I place 95+% (Very few spoke up early on about the risk of harm, importance of rejecting the PCR tests and the jab.) of the blame at the feet of the medical community who should have pushed back very hard against this EUA "vaccine". In April or May 2020 they should have read the animal studies done on the mRNA technology for SARS-Cov-1 (initial SARS) and later MERS. 4+ weeks after the lab animals were "vaccinated", they were exposed to the wild virus. They all became severely ill or died. Both times the tests were halted. As you noted above, at that time there were discussions about antibody dependent enhancement (ADE). Immunology 101 makes it obvious the focus on the second line of immune response meant that the injected would spread the disease. Such a disgrace to their Hippocratic Oath!! Mostly, they refuse to evaluate the increase illnesses we have seen since the roll out to determine the cause and to rule them out as a side effect of the jabs, instead passing them off as just part of today's lifestyle which appears to me as a group think CYA professional decision. Thanks to the few critical thinking physicians and medical scientists, the data will continue to become stronger and at some point in the future, they will have to face the REAL medical science!