The Scottish data mirrors the latest UK data that the vaccine is driving escalations in infection, hospitalization, and deaths especially in the double vaccinated (vaccinated on the whole)
This is not great new for the people getting sick. When will the elites stop the mandates, especially for kids? And masks as well? I know they cannot admit they were wrong, but there is so much evidence.
Unfortunately the threshold of deaths, and repeated infections in the vaccinated have not been crossed yet to shatter the false narratives the general public is clinging on to. I hope we get there soon so the madness will stop.
This data mainly shows the "card trick" directing people to the prefered policy of boosting (previously boosting).
Basically the official 2-week lag (and then some reporting lag too) between considered unvaxt>vaxt, 2-jabbed>boosted ...means the negative data falls into the category the politicians are pushing. It's like attributing a pedestrian death to the pavement when they actually got run over in the street.
I'm curious how accurate the age standardization method is. I don't really understand it. Like so many, I have taken an acute interest in statistics and politics over the last two years for some odd reason ;-)
Will age standardization somehow correct for the fact that some people in the unvaccinated group are too old or sick to take a vaccine and additionally are very likely to die, thus driving up the unvaccinated death rate?
Having trouble believing that any legit age standardization process could result in 77 deaths out of 3 million triple vaxed looking actually better than 18 deaths out of 1.5 million in the unvaxed. If vaxed or so heavily weighted toward older, then we should she a similar effect in the double vaxed crowd also. Can you explain this?
This is not great new for the people getting sick. When will the elites stop the mandates, especially for kids? And masks as well? I know they cannot admit they were wrong, but there is so much evidence.
Paul appreciate your dedication and Pitbull tenacity helping we layman to understand the Medical deception.. Here is another one. Is it possible the HIV is in the 1st 2nd or 3rd jabs? https://www.ctvnews.ca/mobile/health/new-hiv-variant-with-more-damaging-health-impacts-discovered-in-netherlands-1.5766602
Unfortunately the threshold of deaths, and repeated infections in the vaccinated have not been crossed yet to shatter the false narratives the general public is clinging on to. I hope we get there soon so the madness will stop.
This data mainly shows the "card trick" directing people to the prefered policy of boosting (previously boosting).
Basically the official 2-week lag (and then some reporting lag too) between considered unvaxt>vaxt, 2-jabbed>boosted ...means the negative data falls into the category the politicians are pushing. It's like attributing a pedestrian death to the pavement when they actually got run over in the street.
Full (necessarily complex) analysis
https://boriquagato.substack.com/p/bayesian-datacrime-defining-vaccine
I'm curious how accurate the age standardization method is. I don't really understand it. Like so many, I have taken an acute interest in statistics and politics over the last two years for some odd reason ;-)
Will age standardization somehow correct for the fact that some people in the unvaccinated group are too old or sick to take a vaccine and additionally are very likely to die, thus driving up the unvaccinated death rate?
One could also say that hospitalization and death is lower for the triple jabbed than the unvaxxed. How do you counter that?
Having trouble believing that any legit age standardization process could result in 77 deaths out of 3 million triple vaxed looking actually better than 18 deaths out of 1.5 million in the unvaxed. If vaxed or so heavily weighted toward older, then we should she a similar effect in the double vaxed crowd also. Can you explain this?