And we have to wonder, what WAS and now IS the AstraZeneca (or any of the) jab(s) now? Do we really know? Can we ever trust any of the claims made in this area?
Have you ever looked up, say, 'AstraZeneca crispr', perhaps later also adding in 'mRNA mDNA'? Doing so just now had various articles change pretty much before my eyes, so you might want to hurry, in looking, if interested.
AstraZeneca may have initially used traditionally 'sturdier' DNA, rather than the reinforced also-synthetic and computer-coded mRNA. However, that may have changed, back in 2021/2022.
AstraZeneca to discover and develop self-amplifying RNA therapeutics in new collaboration with VaxEquity
PUBLISHED
23 September 2021
'AstraZeneca has reached an agreement to collaborate with VaxEquity for the discovery, development and commercialisastion of the proprietary self-amplifying RNA (saRNA) therapeutics platform developed at Imperial College London.
'The strategic, long-term research collaboration aims to optimise and validate VaxEquity’s saRNA platform and apply it to advance novel therapeutic programmes. AstraZeneca will support VaxEquity with research and development funding and should AstraZeneca advance any of the research programmes into its pipeline, VaxEquity could receive development, approval and sales based milestones totalling up to $195 million and royalties in the mid-single digits per programme. AstraZeneca has the option to collaborate with VaxEquity on up to 26 drug targets and will also make an investment in VaxEquity to further the development of the saRNA platform.
'VaxEquity was founded by Imperial College London and Morningside in 2020 based on the innovative saRNA technology developed by Professor Robin Shattock and his colleagues at Imperial College London, UK.
'saRNA is a new platform for the development of medicines and vaccines which uses similar technology to mRNA but with the added ability to self-amplify, thereby expressing proteins for longer, resulting in higher protein levels per dose level. This has the potential to allow saRNAs to be delivered at lower concentrations than conventional mRNA therapeutics, leading to less frequent or lower dosing, lower costs and a much broader range of potential applications. The saRNA platform aims to underpin the next generation of RNA-delivered medicines enabling not only vaccines but also broad range of therapeutic applications.
'Mene Pangalos, Executive Vice President, BioPharmaceuticals R&D, said “This collaboration with VaxEquity adds a promising new platform to our drug discovery toolbox. We believe self-amplifying RNA, once optimised, will allow us to target novel pathways not amenable to traditional drug discovery across our therapy areas of interest.” ...'
Imperial College is, of course, the home of Doll, the King of 'lifestyle attribution', saving from regulation and the 'burdensome' costs of improved ventilation/using/producing less 'cost-effective', (if also less toxic/deadly,) materials/products, the asbestos/radon/radiation/petrochemical and other-related profitably-polluting self-interests who bought up industries and profited from properties known to have long damaged and killed workers, consumers and breathers - asbestos and radon known to have done so in various notorious mines at very high rates, over centuries.
Doll was kept on retainer by Monsanto until his death, having saved both them and multiple militaries from having to compensate WW2 and later troops/the bereaved for injuries and death due to casually-inflicted exposures to asbestos, radiation 'testing', Agent Orange (and the whole poisonous rainbow) that Monsanto produced.
The injured/bereaved rarely got so much as an apology. The corruption and disregard of, and for, human and environmental health and life is long-standing.
As far as I'm concerned, any claim that we all need to be genetically engineered to have our cells taken over to stop normal body maintenance and protection in order to produce anything at all that's foreign to our biology and needs - even if not a pathogen, anything other than what is needed to maintain and protect us in a natural and non-genetically-altering manner, in order to avoid the use of (non-profitable for the pharmafia) 'old-fashioned' nutrition and known safe and effective drugs as aids to regaining health from flu-like illnesses - is a Mad Scientism nightmare.
One where lunatics are attempting to turn any survivors into 'Things' among an 'Internet of Things' to be used by themselves. And this is apparently acceptable as long as they term it 'Transhumanism'?
What the pharmafia/DARPA/Pentagon, whoever, etc. have in ANY of those highly variable jabs is, apparently, a US military secret.
And if health HAD been an issue, the perps would hardly have been, as they were, 'losing no opportunity' to advance this agenda, 'coincidentally' planned for just this time-frame, and in pretty much the manner previously planned, practised and prevaricated.
Instead, globally, pre-existing cost-benefit analysed, non-damaging pandemic protocols would have still been in place, rather than the denial of early treatment, with 'treatment' too-often limited to 'novel' and 'Opposite Day' ineffective and damaging money-makers-for-some.
We have evidence 'out the ying-yang' but too-few uncorrupted courts and judges able to realise that their survival is also at stake, together with that of the very concepts of civilisation, democracy and human rights, with all equal under rights-protective law, equally applying to, and protecting the rights of, all.
But these may come to realise that what can be done to one, can be done to all... and likely will be.
Perhaps they, and others among our now traitor-headed-by-appointment civil forces and checks and balances, will move back into lawful law and rights-protective enforcement, BEFORE nobody remains to speak for them?
Many Australians held off getting AstraZeneca in the hope of getting Pfizer and succeeded. Pfizer was a huge success in Australia. Aussies thought they'd hit the jackpot once they were able to get Pfizer. Warne might have got Pfizer or Moderna or it could have been Astrazeneca.
my understanding is in Australia :
Astra Zeneca was the only vaccine available to certain groups of people, at least early on. Shane Warne would have fallen into that category.
for those that don't know it, Astra Zeneca is NOT mRNA technology.....
And we have to wonder, what WAS and now IS the AstraZeneca (or any of the) jab(s) now? Do we really know? Can we ever trust any of the claims made in this area?
Have you ever looked up, say, 'AstraZeneca crispr', perhaps later also adding in 'mRNA mDNA'? Doing so just now had various articles change pretty much before my eyes, so you might want to hurry, in looking, if interested.
AstraZeneca may have initially used traditionally 'sturdier' DNA, rather than the reinforced also-synthetic and computer-coded mRNA. However, that may have changed, back in 2021/2022.
https://www.astrazeneca.com/media-centre/press-releases/2021/astrazeneca-to-discover-and-develop-self-amplifying-rna-therapeutics-in-new-collaboration-with-vaxequity.html
AstraZeneca to discover and develop self-amplifying RNA therapeutics in new collaboration with VaxEquity
PUBLISHED
23 September 2021
'AstraZeneca has reached an agreement to collaborate with VaxEquity for the discovery, development and commercialisastion of the proprietary self-amplifying RNA (saRNA) therapeutics platform developed at Imperial College London.
'The strategic, long-term research collaboration aims to optimise and validate VaxEquity’s saRNA platform and apply it to advance novel therapeutic programmes. AstraZeneca will support VaxEquity with research and development funding and should AstraZeneca advance any of the research programmes into its pipeline, VaxEquity could receive development, approval and sales based milestones totalling up to $195 million and royalties in the mid-single digits per programme. AstraZeneca has the option to collaborate with VaxEquity on up to 26 drug targets and will also make an investment in VaxEquity to further the development of the saRNA platform.
'VaxEquity was founded by Imperial College London and Morningside in 2020 based on the innovative saRNA technology developed by Professor Robin Shattock and his colleagues at Imperial College London, UK.
'saRNA is a new platform for the development of medicines and vaccines which uses similar technology to mRNA but with the added ability to self-amplify, thereby expressing proteins for longer, resulting in higher protein levels per dose level. This has the potential to allow saRNAs to be delivered at lower concentrations than conventional mRNA therapeutics, leading to less frequent or lower dosing, lower costs and a much broader range of potential applications. The saRNA platform aims to underpin the next generation of RNA-delivered medicines enabling not only vaccines but also broad range of therapeutic applications.
'Mene Pangalos, Executive Vice President, BioPharmaceuticals R&D, said “This collaboration with VaxEquity adds a promising new platform to our drug discovery toolbox. We believe self-amplifying RNA, once optimised, will allow us to target novel pathways not amenable to traditional drug discovery across our therapy areas of interest.” ...'
............................................................................................................................
Imperial College is, of course, the home of Doll, the King of 'lifestyle attribution', saving from regulation and the 'burdensome' costs of improved ventilation/using/producing less 'cost-effective', (if also less toxic/deadly,) materials/products, the asbestos/radon/radiation/petrochemical and other-related profitably-polluting self-interests who bought up industries and profited from properties known to have long damaged and killed workers, consumers and breathers - asbestos and radon known to have done so in various notorious mines at very high rates, over centuries.
Doll was kept on retainer by Monsanto until his death, having saved both them and multiple militaries from having to compensate WW2 and later troops/the bereaved for injuries and death due to casually-inflicted exposures to asbestos, radiation 'testing', Agent Orange (and the whole poisonous rainbow) that Monsanto produced.
The injured/bereaved rarely got so much as an apology. The corruption and disregard of, and for, human and environmental health and life is long-standing.
As far as I'm concerned, any claim that we all need to be genetically engineered to have our cells taken over to stop normal body maintenance and protection in order to produce anything at all that's foreign to our biology and needs - even if not a pathogen, anything other than what is needed to maintain and protect us in a natural and non-genetically-altering manner, in order to avoid the use of (non-profitable for the pharmafia) 'old-fashioned' nutrition and known safe and effective drugs as aids to regaining health from flu-like illnesses - is a Mad Scientism nightmare.
One where lunatics are attempting to turn any survivors into 'Things' among an 'Internet of Things' to be used by themselves. And this is apparently acceptable as long as they term it 'Transhumanism'?
What the pharmafia/DARPA/Pentagon, whoever, etc. have in ANY of those highly variable jabs is, apparently, a US military secret.
And if health HAD been an issue, the perps would hardly have been, as they were, 'losing no opportunity' to advance this agenda, 'coincidentally' planned for just this time-frame, and in pretty much the manner previously planned, practised and prevaricated.
Instead, globally, pre-existing cost-benefit analysed, non-damaging pandemic protocols would have still been in place, rather than the denial of early treatment, with 'treatment' too-often limited to 'novel' and 'Opposite Day' ineffective and damaging money-makers-for-some.
We have evidence 'out the ying-yang' but too-few uncorrupted courts and judges able to realise that their survival is also at stake, together with that of the very concepts of civilisation, democracy and human rights, with all equal under rights-protective law, equally applying to, and protecting the rights of, all.
But these may come to realise that what can be done to one, can be done to all... and likely will be.
Perhaps they, and others among our now traitor-headed-by-appointment civil forces and checks and balances, will move back into lawful law and rights-protective enforcement, BEFORE nobody remains to speak for them?
Many Australians held off getting AstraZeneca in the hope of getting Pfizer and succeeded. Pfizer was a huge success in Australia. Aussies thought they'd hit the jackpot once they were able to get Pfizer. Warne might have got Pfizer or Moderna or it could have been Astrazeneca.
and far as i am concerned: all three have problems...