Its not what he said. He said that EVEN with the only fact of distrusting the government, the antivaxxers still won. And that there is nothing wrong with mistrusting the government.
Its not what he said. He said that EVEN with the only fact of distrusting the government, the antivaxxers still won. And that there is nothing wrong with mistrusting the government.
that’s not how i interpreted it at all. he was condescending, he implied that those who refused the vax weren’t making intelligent, informed, evidenced based decisions. didn’t analyze data or use science.
in my case i sought out the evidence proving that these things stopped infection and more importantly stopped transmission.
according to Pfizer press briefings in early 2021 they’d never tested either outcome. no intentional exposure. and no test preventing transmission. and then the national advisory committee on immunizations (who recommends the vaccines for approval) also had no evidence that they stopped transmission. and then the official story on mRNA was that the scientists injected it into a cell without killing the cell for the first time in 2007. managed to use mRNA to change the function of a cell in 2011. that’s petrie dish level. it can’t safely go from in vitro cell experiments to billions of people getting injected in under 10 years.
i find it insulting that even while calling us ‘right’ they are insulting our intelligence, knowledge, wisdom, research, care, awareness, and critical thought...
Its not what he said. He said that EVEN with the only fact of distrusting the government, the antivaxxers still won. And that there is nothing wrong with mistrusting the government.
that’s not how i interpreted it at all. he was condescending, he implied that those who refused the vax weren’t making intelligent, informed, evidenced based decisions. didn’t analyze data or use science.
in my case i sought out the evidence proving that these things stopped infection and more importantly stopped transmission.
according to Pfizer press briefings in early 2021 they’d never tested either outcome. no intentional exposure. and no test preventing transmission. and then the national advisory committee on immunizations (who recommends the vaccines for approval) also had no evidence that they stopped transmission. and then the official story on mRNA was that the scientists injected it into a cell without killing the cell for the first time in 2007. managed to use mRNA to change the function of a cell in 2011. that’s petrie dish level. it can’t safely go from in vitro cell experiments to billions of people getting injected in under 10 years.
i find it insulting that even while calling us ‘right’ they are insulting our intelligence, knowledge, wisdom, research, care, awareness, and critical thought...