I want to see the vaccine safety trial for all vaccines available that pit vaccine against a true placebo, as in an inert placebo, NOT another vaccine or all the adjuvants from the vaccine minus the bacteria or virus or whatever.
I want to see the vaccine safety trial for all vaccines available that pit vaccine against a true placebo, as in an inert placebo, NOT another vaccine or all the adjuvants from the vaccine minus the bacteria or virus or whatever.
Yes, good point--although I'm not too comfortable w/ the manipulation or otherwise inducement of the unaware victims to even participate in the limited human trials of "double blind placebo controlled" experiments. Forgetting the technical terms at the moment, but there are still sufficient numbers of "controls" extant to make comparison studies (some have been done already) to establish the evidence of harm from all vaccination programs and the superior health status of those free of vaccinations. One more Maddie de Gray(forgive likely misspelling) is one too many. Or provide your preferred example.
I agree. I just want people to understand that vaccine v inert placebo has rarely happened. I remember reading one flu vaccine v inert saline placebo done years ago in Hong Kong or Korea…somewhere Asian…had equal rates of flu in both groups but more than twice as many respiratory infections in the vaccine group. Thats the only one I have seen, though I admittedly don’t look for vaccine studies regularly either.
Yes, I figured that's where you stood. I'm with you. I think what people need to know is the true, hideous history of vaccine "science" and how it has been deployed against them. And that they don't "need" vaccination and are much healthier w/o.
I want to see the vaccine safety trial for all vaccines available that pit vaccine against a true placebo, as in an inert placebo, NOT another vaccine or all the adjuvants from the vaccine minus the bacteria or virus or whatever.
Yes, good point--although I'm not too comfortable w/ the manipulation or otherwise inducement of the unaware victims to even participate in the limited human trials of "double blind placebo controlled" experiments. Forgetting the technical terms at the moment, but there are still sufficient numbers of "controls" extant to make comparison studies (some have been done already) to establish the evidence of harm from all vaccination programs and the superior health status of those free of vaccinations. One more Maddie de Gray(forgive likely misspelling) is one too many. Or provide your preferred example.
I agree. I just want people to understand that vaccine v inert placebo has rarely happened. I remember reading one flu vaccine v inert saline placebo done years ago in Hong Kong or Korea…somewhere Asian…had equal rates of flu in both groups but more than twice as many respiratory infections in the vaccine group. Thats the only one I have seen, though I admittedly don’t look for vaccine studies regularly either.
Yes, I figured that's where you stood. I'm with you. I think what people need to know is the true, hideous history of vaccine "science" and how it has been deployed against them. And that they don't "need" vaccination and are much healthier w/o.