Nice to know. Spell them out so we can evaluate whether or not they're rational and based on facts or just on your opinion or biases or on your "feelings."
Nice to know. Spell them out so we can evaluate whether or not they're rational and based on facts or just on your opinion or biases or on your "feelings."
McKernan maintains that David Martin is wrong about his interpretation of the patents and provides what he claims is detailed evidence on Twitter; he asserts that he is a patent expert and shows detailed graphs and commentary to support his position; I would think David Martin would like to see this and respond and if it happens the exchange should be more than interesting!
A search of McKernan reveals that he has been and is a very active researcher but only recently coming into prominence on Twitter and a number of other sites he promotes; his investigations tend to be highly technical and detailed and usually accompanied with highly scientific graphs; he seems to have a deep interest in "directed evolution" in addition to a background in patents; in any case I don't think it's accidental or coincidental that he has been focusing on "poking holes" in David's patent revelations at this particular time, especially with David's very important lawsuit upcoming; my initial judgment, admittedly premature, is that he may be a paid shill for Pharma or controlled opposition with the aim to cast doubt on David Martin's credibility; Dr. Martin is a fighter and this may be the time for him to come out and face his detractors.
Nice to know. Spell them out so we can evaluate whether or not they're rational and based on facts or just on your opinion or biases or on your "feelings."
McKernan maintains that David Martin is wrong about his interpretation of the patents and provides what he claims is detailed evidence on Twitter; he asserts that he is a patent expert and shows detailed graphs and commentary to support his position; I would think David Martin would like to see this and respond and if it happens the exchange should be more than interesting!
Yes, this exchange definitely needs to be facilitated!
A search of McKernan reveals that he has been and is a very active researcher but only recently coming into prominence on Twitter and a number of other sites he promotes; his investigations tend to be highly technical and detailed and usually accompanied with highly scientific graphs; he seems to have a deep interest in "directed evolution" in addition to a background in patents; in any case I don't think it's accidental or coincidental that he has been focusing on "poking holes" in David's patent revelations at this particular time, especially with David's very important lawsuit upcoming; my initial judgment, admittedly premature, is that he may be a paid shill for Pharma or controlled opposition with the aim to cast doubt on David Martin's credibility; Dr. Martin is a fighter and this may be the time for him to come out and face his detractors.