17 Comments

Naomi, Pfizer's own clinical trials data showed that approximately 66% of Adverse Effects Following Immunization (AEFIs) were in women. Overseas, in Australia, a recently released report from the West Australian state government also found that AEFIs disproportionately affected women, with "... the majority (64%) of reported AEFI cases being female."

What these data demonstrate clearly and unequivocally is that although coerced mass vaccination with these COVID-19 gene injections has harmed both women and men, it has not done so equally.

Nearly 2/3 of those harmed by COVID-19 gene injection policied have been women.

Coerced vaccination clearly and unequivocally constitutes discrimination against women. It's indirect discrimination but discrimination nonetheless.

How is this legal?

Where are the women's human rights advocates?

They should hang their heads in shame.

Naomi, please take up this cause.

I know you speak for all of us now, women and men, girls and boys.

But this is gynocide.

This is an undeclared war on women.

Men should be outraged as much as women because females are our fellow human beings and citizens, mothers, daughters, sisters, spouses and friends and they are being disproportionately and unfairly and possibly unlawfully adversely impacted in terms of their health.

We cannot afford to lose these women

It is a simple fact that, from the standpoint of evolutionary biology, women are more valuable than men.

A society can repopulate with small numbers of men, but the opposite is not true.

I hope this argument is made to every anti-discrimination body in the country and around the world.

Are we not a party to an international convention on the elimination of all forms of discrimination against women?

Expand full comment

excellently stated.

Expand full comment

Thank you. I appreciate that you share the same view on this.

Expand full comment

Check out Naomi’s Dailyclout Rumble channel, to keep up on her latest research. I was pregnant October 2020-June 2021 with my 3rd child and was lectured by 2 different Obgyn’s and a hospital Administrator, that had me in tears after a hours worth of lecturing…trying to convince me to protect my baby and I…for the greater good of my loved ones to ‘stop the spread.’ Instinctively I knew I did NOT want the gene therapy experiment going into my body and held strong that my natural innate immune system would protect us.

Dr. Naomi recently interviewed a midwife about what she’s seeing, in her video ‘Calcified Placentas.’ Yes, this is a direct hit, and is discrimination towards women and the unborn LIVES of our children! The worst genocide in human history is unfolding before our eyes, just more slowly than our past, perceptions of genocide.

We must band together in love and light, and rise above the fear. Thank you Dr. Paul Alexander for living in the solution, not the problem. We value YOU!

Expand full comment

You deserve so much respect for standing up for yourself & your baby! KUDOS!

Expand full comment

THANK YOU!!

Expand full comment

I believe the carnage will greatly surpass the death of the original holocaust, if it hasn’t already.

Expand full comment

Yes the data indicated pregnant woman and babies were fine with covid in 2020. If the virus didn't cause myocarditis from infection but from the vaccine and possibly shedding to unvaxxed then the placenta calcification was from other factors. Mask wearing being a factor. When the vaccines came more problems occurred. Excessive bleeding hematomas and that fits with adverse events happening after vaxxes like post menopausal woman getting periods after the vaccines and auto immune which involves the hypothalamus gland the pituitary gland and blood clots and hypertension. . Mask mandates in effect for too long depriving of necessay oxygen to mom that trickles down to the placenta. Lots of people commenting this way

Expand full comment

A study revealed in 2016 that MRNA would affect woman more. They ignored that. UN Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights ignored their own articles and the right to be free and have no oppression and develop one's personality. That personality means choice to research and protect our bodies and our unborn children and living children.The hypocrites of the UN. I read online people who tweeted UN and it's representatives on human rights and they were silent. They refused to comment. Anti vaxxer is discrimatory.

Expand full comment

I was there live in the front row, and got to speak with her several times at the event. She has a good soul.

Expand full comment

Great speech! Brave woman!

Expand full comment

It was an absolutely wonderful speech. What Dr. Wolf, her team, the War Room posse, and friends have accomplished to expose the real jab dangers and facts is nothing less than astounding. U.S.A. citizens and freedom lovers everywhere are in her debt.

Expand full comment

It is truly unbelievable how no one comes to debate any of you doctors showing your evidence about the danger and horrible consequences of getting this mRNA gene alteration drug other than the government just trying every way to censor you and shut you down. They gave away billions to these company’s and won’t admit they were foolish and made millions of people sick and lots dyed. Scary that as time goes there will be many many more getting sick from this jab and still people lined up for it.

Good job to all you warrior doctors and scientists who are helping all of us who are not what you all are.

Expand full comment

This was a great talk. She is so thoughtful and so correct.

Expand full comment

The UN Declaration on human rights entails the inalienable rights to live free from oppression and want and the develop ones personality. That personality is the freedom to choose through informed consent that also is from personal research experience so labeling anti vaxxers for choice to refuse the covid 19 vaccines is outright theft of the UN declaration on human rights and the premise to develop one's own personality and that forms part of the Canadian Charter of Rights as well and security of the person. A thought police mentality including Bill C11 on censorship and what Canada said regarding unrestricted comments on social media as being wrong steals from the fundamental human rights and secunity of the person to choose who to read what to feel who to believe. The UN violated their own declaration that they praised. What hypocrites

Expand full comment

Courage personified.

Expand full comment