I had to do pcr tests for almost a year 3 times a week. It only showed the one time I had it. The other confirmations were antibodies (high) after my first infection 2020, which was quite unpleasant, and antigene 3 times, when I knew from whom I had gotten the infection.
I just don't see why it should be a toxin (or a flue virus or nothin…
I had to do pcr tests for almost a year 3 times a week. It only showed the one time I had it. The other confirmations were antibodies (high) after my first infection 2020, which was quite unpleasant, and antigene 3 times, when I knew from whom I had gotten the infection.
I just don't see why it should be a toxin (or a flue virus or nothing at all) and not a toxic protein of viral (corona) origin. Is not such mystification/denial perhaps more harmful to a reasonable science than to accept an established virus hypothesis?
I had to do pcr tests for almost a year 3 times a week. It only showed the one time I had it. The other confirmations were antibodies (high) after my first infection 2020, which was quite unpleasant, and antigene 3 times, when I knew from whom I had gotten the infection.
I just don't see why it should be a toxin (or a flue virus or nothing at all) and not a toxic protein of viral (corona) origin. Is not such mystification/denial perhaps more harmful to a reasonable science than to accept an established virus hypothesis?