From
Substack - Guy Duperreault - "Re the 'snake venom' bullshit theory: I suggest that we rethink it because: "... we know now that to learn what is likely true, we must notice what information is expertly sabotaged." Snake venom was brilliantly sabotaged.
I don't believe it explains everything, as the actual bioweapon attack is multi-p…
Substack - Guy Duperreault - "Re the 'snake venom' bullshit theory: I suggest that we rethink it because: "... we know now that to learn what is likely true, we must notice what information is expertly sabotaged." Snake venom was brilliantly sabotaged.
I don't believe it explains everything, as the actual bioweapon attack is multi-pronged and multi-faceted. Here is a short summary of why I don't dismiss that *possibility* that snake (or animal) venom in some form is a part of the mix of this bio-battlefield part of the war.
Snake Venom Stew Peters and Brian Ardis:
I have come to think that snake venom is a part of the roll out, a part of the plan. The manner of the spread of the infection along administrative boundaries delineated by Dr. Yeadon (and others) supports that. The CIA used snake venom to test it as an invisible pathogen in the 1970s on the FBI building. It remained an undetected pathogen administered via their water system in a secure building filled with envenomated sick FBI employees. The CIA, in a congressional hearing on public record, revealed in detail how to deploy it in water systems, accommodating for chlorine, which neutralises it. It is also very easily aerosolised. The disadvantage of that method is that illness is not reliably predictable, a condition not required to create a plandemic of sickness that is mostly fictitious. (Hydroxychloroquine contains chlorine; and advocates of chlorine dioxide as a cure suggest that both may be effective in part, at least, because they may be neutralising the presence of venom, when it exists. Pierre Kory describes how different patients have different symptoms and require different treatment plans. This suggest that the various injections and or methods of infection may contain different dosages, of differing strengths, differing quality controls, and different ingredients from placebo, to contaminants, to even snake venom. )
In an interesting bit of science, it turns out that venom is used to cleave genes and there are venom peptides in the spike protein and/or other elements of the mystery soup that makes up the injections.
Snake (and animal) venom peptides attach to the nicotinic acetylcholine receptors. Nicotine and ivermectin are the best antidotes to this because both displace the venom peptides. The venom peptides that attach to the nicotinic acetylcholine receptors depress the breathing mechanism and slow the heart, mimicking respiratory illness. So, for this reason the respiratory response was incorrect. If covid was respiratory then smokers would be at high risk, and yet were only about 5% in a French study in early 2020. When this was pointed to the health officials, the following week the msn broadcast the importance of smokers to stop smoking immediately because they were 95% of the deaths. A total lie. Biden has signed law that tobacco manufacturers are to reduce nicotine in tobacco; Australia to ban liquid nicotine imports in 2023; Canada and New Zealand have announced the intention to start a strong stop smoking campaigns. (For me, personally, I did an intuitive test that confirms the presence of venom as a part of the whole enchilada.)
I go back to your quotation attributed to Sherman: "... we know now that to learn what is likely true, we must notice what information is expertly sabotaged." Deliberately or unconsciously, one of the most expertly sabotaged 'possible' explanation, at least in part to the covid 'virus' and spread, was the snake venom.
And I would add to that: look to where the MSM is telling you to go or do, and likely the opposite is the healthy choice."
And look at the big picture...even people like Dr. Lee Merritt have been puzzled by how the virus behaved....and spread or DIDN:T. She was following parasites...they thought of snake venom...and of course, Matthew Crawford brought up a great interview with someone talking about infectious clone swarms...
All of them are just seeking some answers to how/why/what the hell went on with spread/variants/etc.
I don't condemn anyone looking to explain the evil and the patterns of what happened and is happening.
From
Substack - Guy Duperreault - "Re the 'snake venom' bullshit theory: I suggest that we rethink it because: "... we know now that to learn what is likely true, we must notice what information is expertly sabotaged." Snake venom was brilliantly sabotaged.
I don't believe it explains everything, as the actual bioweapon attack is multi-pronged and multi-faceted. Here is a short summary of why I don't dismiss that *possibility* that snake (or animal) venom in some form is a part of the mix of this bio-battlefield part of the war.
Snake Venom Stew Peters and Brian Ardis:
I have come to think that snake venom is a part of the roll out, a part of the plan. The manner of the spread of the infection along administrative boundaries delineated by Dr. Yeadon (and others) supports that. The CIA used snake venom to test it as an invisible pathogen in the 1970s on the FBI building. It remained an undetected pathogen administered via their water system in a secure building filled with envenomated sick FBI employees. The CIA, in a congressional hearing on public record, revealed in detail how to deploy it in water systems, accommodating for chlorine, which neutralises it. It is also very easily aerosolised. The disadvantage of that method is that illness is not reliably predictable, a condition not required to create a plandemic of sickness that is mostly fictitious. (Hydroxychloroquine contains chlorine; and advocates of chlorine dioxide as a cure suggest that both may be effective in part, at least, because they may be neutralising the presence of venom, when it exists. Pierre Kory describes how different patients have different symptoms and require different treatment plans. This suggest that the various injections and or methods of infection may contain different dosages, of differing strengths, differing quality controls, and different ingredients from placebo, to contaminants, to even snake venom. )
In an interesting bit of science, it turns out that venom is used to cleave genes and there are venom peptides in the spike protein and/or other elements of the mystery soup that makes up the injections.
Snake (and animal) venom peptides attach to the nicotinic acetylcholine receptors. Nicotine and ivermectin are the best antidotes to this because both displace the venom peptides. The venom peptides that attach to the nicotinic acetylcholine receptors depress the breathing mechanism and slow the heart, mimicking respiratory illness. So, for this reason the respiratory response was incorrect. If covid was respiratory then smokers would be at high risk, and yet were only about 5% in a French study in early 2020. When this was pointed to the health officials, the following week the msn broadcast the importance of smokers to stop smoking immediately because they were 95% of the deaths. A total lie. Biden has signed law that tobacco manufacturers are to reduce nicotine in tobacco; Australia to ban liquid nicotine imports in 2023; Canada and New Zealand have announced the intention to start a strong stop smoking campaigns. (For me, personally, I did an intuitive test that confirms the presence of venom as a part of the whole enchilada.)
I go back to your quotation attributed to Sherman: "... we know now that to learn what is likely true, we must notice what information is expertly sabotaged." Deliberately or unconsciously, one of the most expertly sabotaged 'possible' explanation, at least in part to the covid 'virus' and spread, was the snake venom.
And I would add to that: look to where the MSM is telling you to go or do, and likely the opposite is the healthy choice."
And look at the big picture...even people like Dr. Lee Merritt have been puzzled by how the virus behaved....and spread or DIDN:T. She was following parasites...they thought of snake venom...and of course, Matthew Crawford brought up a great interview with someone talking about infectious clone swarms...
All of them are just seeking some answers to how/why/what the hell went on with spread/variants/etc.
I don't condemn anyone looking to explain the evil and the patterns of what happened and is happening.
I remember Dr. Merritt even wondering if covid was sprayed in the air.
The hotspots were N. Italy, NYC, and Wuhan.
Why not Topeka or Bermuda?
BTW, love Dr. Merritt.
Me too! Followed her from the get go. She's been trying to figue this out from the beginning.