Dr. Alexander misses Dr. Malone’s statement that he quotes and I’m ready to unsubscribe because of this rant. He isn’t close to offering amnesty but he wants science and truth to win fairly. That is how a scientist thinks and there is nothing wrong with that for God’s sake. He is not a media marketer but a scientist. If he acted like Pet…
Dr. Alexander misses Dr. Malone’s statement that he quotes and I’m ready to unsubscribe because of this rant. He isn’t close to offering amnesty but he wants science and truth to win fairly. That is how a scientist thinks and there is nothing wrong with that for God’s sake. He is not a media marketer but a scientist. If he acted like Peters, I would not think he would be a good scientist! Just like Peter’s sells the sizzle that Dr. Malone can’t, there is serious room for both. Let the media man sell it to the people. Media is dishonest. They play unfairly and prey on vulnerability and emotions. It works plain and simple and we need someone out there to fight fire with fire. Dr. Malone is legit science and that just doesn’t sell like a scary blood clot story. I wish Peters had been a bit more careful more with the snake venom story which hit me as too over blown. He lost credibility with me on that but I still think he’s valuable. Ardis was very convincing with his research on Remdesivir but I thought he came of badly on Peters show. He seemed more balanced and believable on an interview after that but I sort of lost interest in him because of the sensational nature of Peters snake show. So if I thought it was far fetched then I think those on the fence would too. It’s a shame there are big egos at play and it’s not in the best interest of the people. It’s time to put the egos aside and learn to be in the same space without attacking each other. Every one in this space is important and is beat up on enough already.
While I can appreciate Stew Peters passion for making he point about the clot issues, he sensationalizes a bit too much & the drama used to drive the point home went a little overboard. It doesn’t bode well for the sake of getting the information out to those who need to hear it. You are right about the fence sitters. And there are many who are in the field working and missing out on the message altogether because they are under threat of losing their jobs. I know that first hand and just today pointing someone in the right direction as to where they can find answers about myocarditis issue. This after Dr Ladapo, Florida’s Surgeon General’s memo warning of the potential for myocarditis in males aged 18-40 a few weeks ago created a firestorm. You better not be caught talking about clot shots, VAERS, contradicting the CDC protocols etc. the hospital and other areas of healthcare. Censorship has done a number. The snake venom theory by Dr Ardis was a way off to say the least. Peters lost me there. I have the greatest respect for Dr Malone. But I do appreciate the need for cooler minds to prevail. Everyone has a place in this conversation because of the censorship has been so intrusive across the board.
Dr. Alexander misses Dr. Malone’s statement that he quotes and I’m ready to unsubscribe because of this rant. He isn’t close to offering amnesty but he wants science and truth to win fairly. That is how a scientist thinks and there is nothing wrong with that for God’s sake. He is not a media marketer but a scientist. If he acted like Peters, I would not think he would be a good scientist! Just like Peter’s sells the sizzle that Dr. Malone can’t, there is serious room for both. Let the media man sell it to the people. Media is dishonest. They play unfairly and prey on vulnerability and emotions. It works plain and simple and we need someone out there to fight fire with fire. Dr. Malone is legit science and that just doesn’t sell like a scary blood clot story. I wish Peters had been a bit more careful more with the snake venom story which hit me as too over blown. He lost credibility with me on that but I still think he’s valuable. Ardis was very convincing with his research on Remdesivir but I thought he came of badly on Peters show. He seemed more balanced and believable on an interview after that but I sort of lost interest in him because of the sensational nature of Peters snake show. So if I thought it was far fetched then I think those on the fence would too. It’s a shame there are big egos at play and it’s not in the best interest of the people. It’s time to put the egos aside and learn to be in the same space without attacking each other. Every one in this space is important and is beat up on enough already.
While I can appreciate Stew Peters passion for making he point about the clot issues, he sensationalizes a bit too much & the drama used to drive the point home went a little overboard. It doesn’t bode well for the sake of getting the information out to those who need to hear it. You are right about the fence sitters. And there are many who are in the field working and missing out on the message altogether because they are under threat of losing their jobs. I know that first hand and just today pointing someone in the right direction as to where they can find answers about myocarditis issue. This after Dr Ladapo, Florida’s Surgeon General’s memo warning of the potential for myocarditis in males aged 18-40 a few weeks ago created a firestorm. You better not be caught talking about clot shots, VAERS, contradicting the CDC protocols etc. the hospital and other areas of healthcare. Censorship has done a number. The snake venom theory by Dr Ardis was a way off to say the least. Peters lost me there. I have the greatest respect for Dr Malone. But I do appreciate the need for cooler minds to prevail. Everyone has a place in this conversation because of the censorship has been so intrusive across the board.