Thanks for pointing that out. It's important to know. If you find out, please share. Do you think it's probable that one would be markedly less pathogenic than the other, as the jab advocates like to suggest?
Thanks for pointing that out. It's important to know. If you find out, please share. Do you think it's probable that one would be markedly less pathogenic than the other, as the jab advocates like to suggest?
Thanks for pointing that out. It's important to know. If you find out, please share. Do you think it's probable that one would be markedly less pathogenic than the other, as the jab advocates like to suggest?
It is my understanding that they used the pseudouridine because it:
“It is demonstrated that Ψ can enhance RNA stability and, in the meantime, decrease anti-RNA immune response (Karikó et al., 2008)”
Beyond this, are there studies that show the safety of using pseudouridine long them. I didn’t see any.
The Critical Contribution of Pseudouridine to mRNA COVID-19 Vaccines
https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcell.2021.789427/full
Thanks for this.