Yeah. This whole thing is the OPPOSITE of what has always happened in medicine in the past. The only purpose that I could see from the moment they advised the elderly to take this shot is that they want to kill the older people.
1. Your risk for disease is a function of your state of health NOT your age necessarily. An obese 25 year old with diabetes, hypertension and renal deficiency and or smoking and or drug use is at a far higher risk for any infectious disease than a 75 year old life long non smoker at ideal body weight.
2. The trial only tested young healthy people up to age 65. In the past we NEVER advised an omitted demographic to use whatever drug was tested. That is called malpractice.
3. Life expectancy for anyone entering a nursing home is <1 year! 45% die within 6 months and another 50% by 12 months. That alone is the reason that heretofore nursing home residents were NOT vaccinated for anything. The risk of speeding up death was greater than any possible benefit.
4. There are 2 classes of elderly: robust and frail. Robust are unimpaired, living independently and participating in society. Frail are those who qualify to enter a nursing home - NOT assisted living but Nursing Home. Criteria for entry to a NH is lack of independence in 2 out the 6 essential activities of daily living (walking, transferring from sitting to standing; toileting; dressing oneself; finding food; feeding oneself). If you cannot do 2 or more of these you will die - and that is why you qualify for a NH, which has attendant care 24/7.
These are the people who are at risk from dying from the common cold - not the robust elderly. But these are the LAST people who have, in the past and by all medical guidelines, been given traditional vaccines. Why have they been PRIORITIZED to get an experimental v@((*ne - unless someone figures that because they are going to die anyway we won't be liable for lost wages and other stuff if we can get sued.
Just like. I one needs a bullet to the head for a lead deficiency.
Yeah. This whole thing is the OPPOSITE of what has always happened in medicine in the past. The only purpose that I could see from the moment they advised the elderly to take this shot is that they want to kill the older people.
1. Your risk for disease is a function of your state of health NOT your age necessarily. An obese 25 year old with diabetes, hypertension and renal deficiency and or smoking and or drug use is at a far higher risk for any infectious disease than a 75 year old life long non smoker at ideal body weight.
2. The trial only tested young healthy people up to age 65. In the past we NEVER advised an omitted demographic to use whatever drug was tested. That is called malpractice.
3. Life expectancy for anyone entering a nursing home is <1 year! 45% die within 6 months and another 50% by 12 months. That alone is the reason that heretofore nursing home residents were NOT vaccinated for anything. The risk of speeding up death was greater than any possible benefit.
4. There are 2 classes of elderly: robust and frail. Robust are unimpaired, living independently and participating in society. Frail are those who qualify to enter a nursing home - NOT assisted living but Nursing Home. Criteria for entry to a NH is lack of independence in 2 out the 6 essential activities of daily living (walking, transferring from sitting to standing; toileting; dressing oneself; finding food; feeding oneself). If you cannot do 2 or more of these you will die - and that is why you qualify for a NH, which has attendant care 24/7.
These are the people who are at risk from dying from the common cold - not the robust elderly. But these are the LAST people who have, in the past and by all medical guidelines, been given traditional vaccines. Why have they been PRIORITIZED to get an experimental v@((*ne - unless someone figures that because they are going to die anyway we won't be liable for lost wages and other stuff if we can get sued.
No one