How & why did Biden-Obama wave POTUS Trump's constitutional executive privilege? Why would they do that? They did it to get the national archives to issue a criminal referral into Trump's classified
How & why did Biden-Obama wave POTUS Trump's constitutional executive privilege? Why would they do that? They did it to get the national archives to issue a criminal referral into Trump's classified
documents which they don't have the authority to do under the presidential records act....where is SCOTUS? Where is the Republican House? The Speaker Johnson? petzanpz writes brilliantly
John Roberts (SCOTUS) has looked and acted like he is a castrato when it comes to anything of import. He hides behind 'numbers' on rulings. There has to be kompromat on him, unless he truly doesn't care about the rule of law. Deep State probably insinuating also that they will ram some kind of court-packing scheme in if he actually would do his job of protecting the Constitutional freedoms. And him stepping down is not an option because there is no Republican in the White House right now. The Deep State loves 50/50 or close to it, because it reinforces inaction and status quo, which means the Left terrorizing the Right, and the Right just posting memes in response.
The Republican house and senate were infiltrated many years ago with recent increased intensity by democRATs who seek world domination. These same FOOLS can't even take care of their own District let alone the whole world. Fuck ups in charge in national governments have earned Extermination.
THAT AND SOME OTHER DETAILS YET UNKNOWN- THE RUSH TO RAID LAGO MAR HAD MORE TO DO WITH THE RETRIEVAL OF A DOCUMENT THAT IF FOUND AND RECOGNIZED BY THE TRUMP TEAM COULD SENT THAT MOTHER FUCKER SCUMBAG MERRICK GARLAND AWAY FOR A LONG TIME
Everyday we learn more about how lawfare is being used to influence the outcome of the upcoming election. Trump violated no laws, in fact he followed the law to the letter:
Special Counsel Jack Smith and his team slammed U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon for issuing an order asking prosecutors and defense attorneys involved
in the Trump classified documents case to file proposed jury instructions based on what Smith alleges is a “fundamentally flawed legal premise.”
Cannon accepted the argument from Trump’s legal team that the President Records Act (PRA) permitted the former President to keep sensitive documents at
this home in Palm Beach, Florida. The PRA, enacted in 1978, permits former presidents to retain personal documents after leaving office but mandates that
outgoing presidents return all official presidential records to the National Archives.
On Tuesday, Smith and his team submitted a filing claiming the PRA is irrelevant to the case. “Not a single one had heard Trump say that he was
designating records as personal or that, at the time he caused the transfer of boxes to Mar-a-Lago, he believed that his removal of records amounted to
designating them as personal under the PRA,” the filing claims.
Smith is leading what many observers believe to be a politically motivated investigation into Trump’s handling of classified material. In December of last
year, a CNN analyst said Smith was trying to jail Trump before the election. The same month, the Supreme Court denied Smith’s request for an expedited
hearing on Trump’s presidential immunity claims. Adding to concerns about Smith’s impartiality in the case are revelations that the Justice Department is
trying to hide the identities of individuals who work for the special prosecutor.
John Roberts (SCOTUS) has looked and acted like he is a castrato when it comes to anything of import. He hides behind 'numbers' on rulings. There has to be kompromat on him, unless he truly doesn't care about the rule of law. Deep State probably insinuating also that they will ram some kind of court-packing scheme in if he actually would do his job of protecting the Constitutional freedoms. And him stepping down is not an option because there is no Republican in the White House right now. The Deep State loves 50/50 or close to it, because it reinforces inaction and status quo, which means the Left terrorizing the Right, and the Right just posting memes in response.
The Republican house and senate were infiltrated many years ago with recent increased intensity by democRATs who seek world domination. These same FOOLS can't even take care of their own District let alone the whole world. Fuck ups in charge in national governments have earned Extermination.
THAT AND SOME OTHER DETAILS YET UNKNOWN- THE RUSH TO RAID LAGO MAR HAD MORE TO DO WITH THE RETRIEVAL OF A DOCUMENT THAT IF FOUND AND RECOGNIZED BY THE TRUMP TEAM COULD SENT THAT MOTHER FUCKER SCUMBAG MERRICK GARLAND AWAY FOR A LONG TIME
Everyday we learn more about how lawfare is being used to influence the outcome of the upcoming election. Trump violated no laws, in fact he followed the law to the letter:
https://thenationalpulse.com/2024/04/03/jack-smith-is-attacking-a-judge-for-upholding-this-critical-u-s-law/
Special Counsel Jack Smith and his team slammed U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon for issuing an order asking prosecutors and defense attorneys involved
in the Trump classified documents case to file proposed jury instructions based on what Smith alleges is a “fundamentally flawed legal premise.”
Cannon accepted the argument from Trump’s legal team that the President Records Act (PRA) permitted the former President to keep sensitive documents at
this home in Palm Beach, Florida. The PRA, enacted in 1978, permits former presidents to retain personal documents after leaving office but mandates that
outgoing presidents return all official presidential records to the National Archives.
On Tuesday, Smith and his team submitted a filing claiming the PRA is irrelevant to the case. “Not a single one had heard Trump say that he was
designating records as personal or that, at the time he caused the transfer of boxes to Mar-a-Lago, he believed that his removal of records amounted to
designating them as personal under the PRA,” the filing claims.
Smith is leading what many observers believe to be a politically motivated investigation into Trump’s handling of classified material. In December of last
year, a CNN analyst said Smith was trying to jail Trump before the election. The same month, the Supreme Court denied Smith’s request for an expedited
hearing on Trump’s presidential immunity claims. Adding to concerns about Smith’s impartiality in the case are revelations that the Justice Department is
trying to hide the identities of individuals who work for the special prosecutor.
IT ACTUALLY SEEMS PRETTY SIMPLE:
https://casetext.com/case/judicial-watch-inc-v-natl-archives-records-admin
Under the statutory scheme established by the PRA, the decision to segregate
personal materials from Presidential records is made by the President, during the President's term and in his sole discretion,
see 44 U.S.C. § 2203(b) https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/44/2203
(b) Documentary materials produced or received by the President, the President’s staff, or units or individuals in the Executive Office of the
President the function of which is to advise or assist the President, shall, to the extent practicable, be categorized as Presidential records or
personal records upon their creation or receipt and be filed separately.
The Court notes at the outset that there is broad language in Armstrong I stating that the PRA accords the President “virtually complete control”
over his records during his time in office. 924 F.2d at 290. In particular, the court stated that the President enjoys unconstrained authority to
make decisions regarding the disposal of documents: “[a]lthough the President must notify the Archivist before disposing of records ... neither the
Archivist nor Congress has the authority to veto the President's disposal decision.” Id., citing H.R. Rep. No. 95–1487, at 13 (1978), reprinted in
1978 U.S.C.C.A.N. at 5744. Since the President is completely entrusted with the management and even the disposal of Presidential records during his
time in office, it would be difficult for this Court to conclude that Congress intended that he would have less authority to do what he pleases with
what he considers to be his personal records.
1- THE JUDGE'S RULING:
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.flsd.648652/gov.uscourts.flsd.648652.407.0.pdf
(a) In a prosecution of a former president for allegedly retaining documents in violation of 18
U.S.C. § 793(e), a jury is permitted to examine a record retained by a former president in
his/her personal possession at the end of his/her presidency and make a factual finding as
to whether the government has proven beyond a reasonable doubt that it is personal or
presidential using the definitions set forth in the Presidential Records Act (PRA).3
(b) A president has sole authority under the PRA to categorize records as personal or
presidential during his/her presidency. Neither a court nor a jury is permitted to make or
review such a categorization decision. Although there is no formal means in the PRA by
which a president is to make that categorization, an outgoing president’s decision to
exclude what he/she considers to be personal records from presidential records transmitted
to the National Archives and Records Administration constitutes a president’s
categorization of those records as personal under the PRA.
2- SELECTIVE PROSECUTION? https://thehill.com/policy/national-security/4009329-archives-every-administration-since-reagan-has-mishandled-classified-docs/
At the time president Trump brought those documents to Mar-O-Lago they were all declassified. Trump had the absolute authority to declassify or
classify any document in his possession:
https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/484/518/ Department of the Navy v. Egan :: 484 U.S. 518 (1988)
The President, after all, is the "Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States." U.S.Const., Art. II, § 2. His authority to
classify and control access to information bearing on national security and to determine whether an individual is sufficiently trustworthy to
occupy a position in the Executive Branch that will give that person access to such information flows primarily from this constitutional investment
of power in the President, and exists quite apart from any explicit congressional grant. See Cafeteria Workers v. McElroy,
367 U. S. 886, 367 U. 890 (1961). This Court has recognized the Government's "compelling interest" in withholding national security information
from unauthorized persons in the course of executive business. Snepp v. United States, 444 U. S. 507, 444 U. S. 509, n. 3 (1980). See also United
States v. Robel, 389 U. S. 258, 389 U. S. 267 (1967); United States v. Reynolds, 345 U. S. 1, 345 U. S. 10 (1953); Totten v. United States,
92 U. S. 105, 92 U. S. 106 (1876). The authority to protect such information falls on the President as head of the Executive Branch and as
Commander in Chief.
https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2017-05-16/trump-s-classified-disclosure-is-shocking-but-legal
http://historynewsnetwork.org/article/165945
The president, however, has inherent constitutional authority to declassify information at will.
https://youtu.be/S2_Ar5i3dl4 "'You Don't Know What The Warrant Says?': Andrew Clyde Grills FBI Director On Raid Of Trump's Home"
https://trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov/presidential-actions/memorandum-declassification-certain-materials-related-fbis-crossfire-hurricane-investigation/
Date January 19, 2021...