Historically no one votes for president based upon the VP on the ticket.
Let's not forget the backlash Dem George McGovern received as a result of dropping Eagleton.
It would be considerably worse "optics" if Trump were to "change his mind" under pressure after naming his running mate. IMO We have to trust and fully support his decision, n…
Historically no one votes for president based upon the VP on the ticket.
Let's not forget the backlash Dem George McGovern received as a result of dropping Eagleton.
It would be considerably worse "optics" if Trump were to "change his mind" under pressure after naming his running mate. IMO We have to trust and fully support his decision, not second guess him. Democrats immediately united behind 'empty pants suit Harris.' Republicans must do the same or profoundly regret it in November.
There undoubtedly would have been complaints no matter who Trump picked for VP. I don't see how anyone could suggest Vance is not up to the Presidency in 2028 after four years of braindead Biden and airhead Harris.
Parting shot: Even I might have re-considered voting for Trump if he had named creepy "yes man" Vivek as his running mate.
Historically no one votes for president based upon the VP on the ticket.
Let's not forget the backlash Dem George McGovern received as a result of dropping Eagleton.
It would be considerably worse "optics" if Trump were to "change his mind" under pressure after naming his running mate. IMO We have to trust and fully support his decision, not second guess him. Democrats immediately united behind 'empty pants suit Harris.' Republicans must do the same or profoundly regret it in November.
There undoubtedly would have been complaints no matter who Trump picked for VP. I don't see how anyone could suggest Vance is not up to the Presidency in 2028 after four years of braindead Biden and airhead Harris.
Parting shot: Even I might have re-considered voting for Trump if he had named creepy "yes man" Vivek as his running mate.