8 Comments
User's avatar
⭠ Return to thread
patrick.net/memes's avatar

I suspect that promoting something so obviously false as the idea that men can have periods is intended to be a distraction from things they don't want us to talk about.

Maybe one thing they don't want us talking about is the fact that the very wealthy pay only 15% tax (capital gains) on vast income, while people who actually work pay up to 37%.

Or maybe it's a distraction from Hunter's laptop, which proves that he and Joe Biden are criminals who take bribes from foreigners to alter US government policy.

There are lots of other things they don't want us talking about too. Having us refute nonsense like men with periods keeps us distracted.

Expand full comment
KellyG's avatar

Well it wouldn't hurt if they'd tell people that Wages aren't taxable on the one matter.

This is where people go yeah right and a bear don't shit in the woods right?

Then I ask, well what's your source that proves they are?

Which I've never even gotten the 16th amendment reply yet, and I tell them mine is the IRS.

I will start with the W-9 found here. You have to expand to see Wages listed at bottom.

https://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/fw9.pdf

Start with Section 3. What used to be Tax Exempt is now called "Other". What does it say about other? (see instructions) Feel free to look through all of the 6 pages to see if you can find a definition. I couldn't. I knew about other since back in 2016 when I helped a gal who was getting back into the workforce explaining it to her, and it worked. Except they still withhold State, FUCA, and FICA taxes.

So now we'll go to the next form that the Employer is not required to show you. I still don't believe there's a definition for other, so let me know if you find one but it's irrelevant if you know, it's the info about wages that's important.

Instructions for the Requester of Form W-9

https://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/iw9.pdf

Now if you look on the top of page 2 L/H or left hand side you will find this statement in the 2nd paragraph but before the section TIN applied for

"you are required to provide the Form W-9 instructions to the payee only if he or she requests

them."

You will notice that is the title on the heading of this document. Think they may not want you to know this?

Now go to the bottom of page 2 L/H side and note these are "OTHERS" no definition, but under the title

"Payees Exempt From Backup Withholding"

"The following payees are exempt from backup withholding with

respect to the payments below, and should enter the

corresponding exempt payee code on Form W-9. You may rely on the payee’s claim of exemption unless you have actual knowledge that the exempt payee code and/or classification

selected are not valid, or if they are inconsistent with each other."

continued on the top R/h side of page 3

"In that case, you may rely on the Form W-9 for purposes of obtaining the payee’s TIN, but you must treat the payee as non-exempt."

Top L/H side of page 3 you'll notice the lovely title

"Payments Exempt From Backup Withholding"

"Payments that are not subject to information reporting also are not subject to backup withholding."

Go down to other types of payments to find it under the first bullet point.

"Other types of payment.

• Wages."

Expand full comment
Capt. Roy Harkness's avatar

Many years ago here in Canada I happened to come across my boss's T4 slip.. Revenue Canada stated his income as $300,000. He paid taxes on this income, something like $7,000. I on the other hand was earning something like $30,000. I paid taxes on my income, $10,000.

I'm sure a situation like this pertains across The West and in the Third World it's probably far worse. The very wealthy don't pay anything like 15% tax, on income, capital gains, nor anything else.

Expand full comment
consuelo's avatar

I think you are right.

also it enrages normal people to have this insanity in their face. Like Biden's handlers hiring the many loonie criminals, men dressed as women, lezzie's and queer men in our faces (even J. Edgar Hoover hid his perversions from the public) and consider FOX, they have a corral of pervs they pay to get in our faces. All their Catholic talking heads seem okay with it.

Expand full comment
patrick.net/memes's avatar

Yes, maybe it's part of a demoralization campaign by the WEF/Soros/etc

Forcing people to say literally false things humiliates them.

Expand full comment