If a killer brutally murders an innocent person, who can disagree that this person is morally bankrupt and must be punished? But what if this person was hired by a wealthy person, who paid this person well for their crime? Are they any less immoral, or less deserving of punishment? Who is the more evil one, the one committing the murder …
If a killer brutally murders an innocent person, who can disagree that this person is morally bankrupt and must be punished? But what if this person was hired by a wealthy person, who paid this person well for their crime? Are they any less immoral, or less deserving of punishment? Who is the more evil one, the one committing the murder act, or the one who quietly hides in the shadows, trying to escape responsibility? I don't think there are any answers, but these are questions that are worth asking.
No stand down order, no breaches of the fence. No breaches of the fence, no dead Israeli citizens. No dead Israeli citizens, no justification for yet another murderous rampage.
Ergo, Israel willfully sacrificed a thousand people so that they could FALSELY CLAIM their premeditated slaughter of Palestinians is done in self-defense.
If Hamas was created by Israel, consider the possibility Hamas was created to misrepresent Gazans, and to act in ways that give Israel the pretenses to destroy and plunder Gaza.
Is there evidence Israel has done such things? Yes, plenty. Books on Israeli terrorism: these books establish the pattern.
Rise & Kill First
Ronen Bergman
Israels Sacred Terrorism
Livia Rokach
Hidden History of Zionism
Ralph Schoenman
Ben Gurion's Scandals: How the Haganah & the Mossad Eliminated Jews
Naeim Giladi
State of Terror
Thom Suarez
The IDF's fence was more instrumented, monitored and patrolled than probably any other concentration camp anywhere, ever. FIFTEEN breeches, explosives, trucks driving through... On every other day, if a dog touched the fence snipers would be alerted and jeeps dispatched.
The IDF stood down for seven hours. Israeli's who served that duty, securing the concentration camp barrier, are objecting and concluding there must have been a stand down order:
Ronen Bergman’s book Rise & Kill First documents Israeli covert control over nominally Arab or Lebanese Terrorist groups in Lebanon. Bergman claims these groups were committing so many terrorists acts that they were a large fraction of planetary terrorism.
And Ostrovsky, in By Way of Deception, claims Israel was running the terrorist group that hijacked the Achille Lauro and killed Leon Klinghoffer.
With this as background, and with knowledge of Israel’s creation of and support for Hamas, is there a chance Israel pulled the strings on this Hamas attack? After all, wasn’t Israel always doing these remote control, false-flag, terrorist operations for political gain, to discredit Israel’s victims, to turn those victims into (apparent but not real) aggressors and thereby give Israel pretense to commit more massacres and more ethnic cleansings and more unrestrained violence all the while pretending to be victims?
If you own and control enough media, you can easily deceive the western world and have them clamoring, as after 9/11, for brutal vengeance against countries actually innocent of the accusations. And if there is no hell, they will get cleanly away with it because brainwashed people think they are acting justly and righteously when they are actually murdering innocents while serving masterful liars.
Agreed! The fact that Israel waited many hours (hours!) to respond to this incursion, when they normally have the border hermetically sealed and respond to the slightest anomaly because of total surveillance says that they must have known ahead of time. Not only this, but that they were in on the scheme.
If a killer brutally murders an innocent person, who can disagree that this person is morally bankrupt and must be punished? But what if this person was hired by a wealthy person, who paid this person well for their crime? Are they any less immoral, or less deserving of punishment? Who is the more evil one, the one committing the murder act, or the one who quietly hides in the shadows, trying to escape responsibility? I don't think there are any answers, but these are questions that are worth asking.
The questions are worth asking.
No stand down order, no breaches of the fence. No breaches of the fence, no dead Israeli citizens. No dead Israeli citizens, no justification for yet another murderous rampage.
Ergo, Israel willfully sacrificed a thousand people so that they could FALSELY CLAIM their premeditated slaughter of Palestinians is done in self-defense.
If Hamas was created by Israel, consider the possibility Hamas was created to misrepresent Gazans, and to act in ways that give Israel the pretenses to destroy and plunder Gaza.
Is there evidence Israel has done such things? Yes, plenty. Books on Israeli terrorism: these books establish the pattern.
Rise & Kill First
Ronen Bergman
Israels Sacred Terrorism
Livia Rokach
Hidden History of Zionism
Ralph Schoenman
Ben Gurion's Scandals: How the Haganah & the Mossad Eliminated Jews
Naeim Giladi
State of Terror
Thom Suarez
The IDF's fence was more instrumented, monitored and patrolled than probably any other concentration camp anywhere, ever. FIFTEEN breeches, explosives, trucks driving through... On every other day, if a dog touched the fence snipers would be alerted and jeeps dispatched.
The IDF stood down for seven hours. Israeli's who served that duty, securing the concentration camp barrier, are objecting and concluding there must have been a stand down order:
https://www.globalresearch.ca/speculation-mark-hamas-attack-allowed-close-book-palestine/5836029
Consider a previous example of remarkable timing.
Netanyahu threatens France because they were considering recognition of Palestinian statehood.
https://www.dawn.com/news/1146512
Then, look at the tsunami of terrorism that began in France immediately after his threat:
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-33288542
Ronen Bergman’s book Rise & Kill First documents Israeli covert control over nominally Arab or Lebanese Terrorist groups in Lebanon. Bergman claims these groups were committing so many terrorists acts that they were a large fraction of planetary terrorism.
And Ostrovsky, in By Way of Deception, claims Israel was running the terrorist group that hijacked the Achille Lauro and killed Leon Klinghoffer.
With this as background, and with knowledge of Israel’s creation of and support for Hamas, is there a chance Israel pulled the strings on this Hamas attack? After all, wasn’t Israel always doing these remote control, false-flag, terrorist operations for political gain, to discredit Israel’s victims, to turn those victims into (apparent but not real) aggressors and thereby give Israel pretense to commit more massacres and more ethnic cleansings and more unrestrained violence all the while pretending to be victims?
If you own and control enough media, you can easily deceive the western world and have them clamoring, as after 9/11, for brutal vengeance against countries actually innocent of the accusations. And if there is no hell, they will get cleanly away with it because brainwashed people think they are acting justly and righteously when they are actually murdering innocents while serving masterful liars.
Agreed! The fact that Israel waited many hours (hours!) to respond to this incursion, when they normally have the border hermetically sealed and respond to the slightest anomaly because of total surveillance says that they must have known ahead of time. Not only this, but that they were in on the scheme.
The IDF didn't show up for 6 and a half to eight hours after the "attack".
One person said it was enough time for Israelis to get out of their Hamas costumes and get back into IDF uniforms....