A military/medical depopulation "solution" for a non-existent problem.
Why are they (Moderna and their government backers) targeting Australia? Exactly how many viral outbreaks of respiratory disease have they had in recent years to evoke or "justify" this over-reaction?
A military/medical depopulation "solution" for a non-existent problem.
Why are they (Moderna and their government backers) targeting Australia? Exactly how many viral outbreaks of respiratory disease have they had in recent years to evoke or "justify" this over-reaction?
Unfortunately for Moderna, at least as regards "covid," the Australians have developed a live attenuated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine which "has been licensed to Indian Immunologicals Ltd, a major vaccine manufacturer."
It is "designed to be administered intranasally, thereby inducing potential mucosal immunity as well as systemic immunity with just a single dose."
"Unlike the mRNA vaccine which targets only the spike protein, CDO-7N-1 induces immunity to all major SARS-CoV-2 proteins and is highly effective against all major variants to date."
I think I read elsewhere that it is purportedly also effective against SARS-CoV-1.
New intranasal COVID-19 vaccine promises broad protection and accessibility
I read your linked news release. This is the optimal way to develop a vaccine. And the reasonable way to induce immunity in the respiratory system. Bravo for this Australian research team.
In truth, it's exactly what I had (mistakenly) expected the U.S. intended to do until I learned the horrifying news the plan was instead to tamper with the building blocks of life rather than produce an actual vaccine.
After 4 years in development, this Griffith University intranasal vaccine will be an exciting project to follow in its later phases. If truly "safe and effective," I could foresee its application for the typically most at risk segments of the population.
But after the (ongoing) government/media/medical abuses of current vaccines, I'm not sure I'd be willing to risk taking even what appears to be an ethically- and scientifically-sound vaccine such as this one. (I'd also worry about the integrity of production facilities in strict adherence to the formula...) Maybe after another 5-10 years. For now, I'll continue to trust my inate immune system.
The best news of all for me is that there are still scientists who recognize that mRNA transfections are not the answer to disease prevention.
A military/medical depopulation "solution" for a non-existent problem.
Why are they (Moderna and their government backers) targeting Australia? Exactly how many viral outbreaks of respiratory disease have they had in recent years to evoke or "justify" this over-reaction?
very very important questions
Unfortunately for Moderna, at least as regards "covid," the Australians have developed a live attenuated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine which "has been licensed to Indian Immunologicals Ltd, a major vaccine manufacturer."
It is "designed to be administered intranasally, thereby inducing potential mucosal immunity as well as systemic immunity with just a single dose."
"Unlike the mRNA vaccine which targets only the spike protein, CDO-7N-1 induces immunity to all major SARS-CoV-2 proteins and is highly effective against all major variants to date."
I think I read elsewhere that it is purportedly also effective against SARS-CoV-1.
New intranasal COVID-19 vaccine promises broad protection and accessibility
https://www.news-medical.net/news/20240827/New-intranasal-COVID-19-vaccine-promises-broad-protection-and-accessibility.aspx
I read your linked news release. This is the optimal way to develop a vaccine. And the reasonable way to induce immunity in the respiratory system. Bravo for this Australian research team.
In truth, it's exactly what I had (mistakenly) expected the U.S. intended to do until I learned the horrifying news the plan was instead to tamper with the building blocks of life rather than produce an actual vaccine.
After 4 years in development, this Griffith University intranasal vaccine will be an exciting project to follow in its later phases. If truly "safe and effective," I could foresee its application for the typically most at risk segments of the population.
But after the (ongoing) government/media/medical abuses of current vaccines, I'm not sure I'd be willing to risk taking even what appears to be an ethically- and scientifically-sound vaccine such as this one. (I'd also worry about the integrity of production facilities in strict adherence to the formula...) Maybe after another 5-10 years. For now, I'll continue to trust my inate immune system.
The best news of all for me is that there are still scientists who recognize that mRNA transfections are not the answer to disease prevention.
I fully agree.