Is there a link between COVID (SARS-COV-2) gene mRNA technology vaccination & new onset or worsening of inflammatory and autoimmune skin diseases? Yes! Hinterseher et al.'s meta-analysis shows us
Is there a link between COVID (SARS-COV-2) gene mRNA technology vaccination & new onset or worsening of inflammatory and autoimmune skin diseases? Yes! Hinterseher et al.'s meta-analysis shows us
Autoimmune skin disorders and SARS-CoV-2 vaccination – a meta-analysis; a link between COVID mRNA vaccination and new onset or worsening of inflammatory and autoimmune skin diseases (Pfizer etc.)
IMPORTANT: The COVID 19 Bioweapons Are “Nano Technology Enabled” – The National Nanotechnology Initiative
"At this time, there should be no further discussion regarding the presence of nanotechnology in the C19 shots. Even the government sees this as a valid scientific truth." - Dr. Ana Maria Mihalcea
1. When the lone Covid viral spike protein gene is expressed as viral protein in ANY of the formerly healthy product-compromised cells, sensors inside those cells detect the presence of A. viral mRNA and B. viral protein translated from that viral mRNA and puts out an alert to the innate immune system to the effect of, “Hey, I’ve been infected by a virus that’s in its replication phase. Launch an innate immune inflammatory attack and kill me before these fuckers get out and infect more cells.” And the innate immune system unleashes inflammatory hell to kill the compromised cells and what appears to be all the viruses they contain. They actually contain no viruses, just copies of the same single viral gene and LOTS of copies of the full-length, physiologically-useless but biologically-active viral protein, but the cell doing the signaling and the innate immune system acting on the signal don’t know that. They are just responding to the minimum necessary conditions needed to signal viral compromise.
Of course, the spike protein can go on to provoke other immune responses.
2. It’s been demonstrated in human liver cells treated with the Pfizer viral RNA product that cellular reverse transcriptase can transcribe viral mRNA into a DNA-encoded form and insert it into the nuclear genome of that cell. Thus, it has the same potential as genital herpes, fever blisters (another herpes simplex), and chickenpox (herpes zoster) to be transcribed from its DNA-encoded form into mRNA and then sent out to the factory floor for protein manufacture.
The others have ALL the proteins made to create new complete viruses that can go on to infect others. The lone viral gene just makes a lone viral protein that won’t infect anyone. But from the POV of the internal cell sensors and the innate immune system responding to them, it still looks exactly like a virus in replication phase and the response is the same.
Things to take away from this:
A. Since the viral RNA products are indiscriminate and infect any cells of any organs they come into contact with, the result of cellular reverse transcriptase would be periodic, ongoing expression of the spike protein and inflammatory events typical of whatever tissue is affected; thus, it would create the appearance of exacerbating existing autoimmune conditions, though it’s really not.
B. Existing autoimmune conditions may themselves be the tissue specific expression of lone viral genes of whatever tissue-specific virus had infected them at one time or another. Doctors look for signs of the putative infectious agent, find none, and say “autoimmune disorder.” In reality, they may just not have been looking for a single viral gene.
C. The problem with the viral RNA products is their indiscriminate nature, meaning one could give rise to many different apparent autoimmune conditions in a wide variety of organs and tissues and all on different timetables and with different triggers for expression.
Call the viral RNA products the Swiss Army knives of “autoimmune disorders.”
Such is my lone gene theory of autoimmune disease I wrote about several months ago.
Who knew there are so many diseases we can be afflicted by.
Lord save us.
This is a nightmarish horror for the sufferers. It must be terribly painful.
I knew someone who developed lichen planus. She was really coy about whether or not she took the jab.
Once she told me her diagnosis, I knew she took the jab.
It seems there is a whole rash of new diseases ever since the vactines were unleashed upon the world.
My oh my. There poison jab doesn’t quit. And the fools are bringing it back. Wake up wake up.
Thank you sincerely, Doc 🩵
IMPORTANT: The COVID 19 Bioweapons Are “Nano Technology Enabled” – The National Nanotechnology Initiative
"At this time, there should be no further discussion regarding the presence of nanotechnology in the C19 shots. Even the government sees this as a valid scientific truth." - Dr. Ana Maria Mihalcea
https://lionessofjudah.substack.com/p/important-the-covid-19-bioweapons
This Is What Total Destruction of the Immune System by mRNA Nanoparticle Bioweapon Looks Like…
https://lionessofjudah.substack.com/p/this-is-what-total-destruction-of
I wonder if Jimmy Buffett was vaxxed? We’ll never know
https://www.gtvflyers.com/every-single-aspect-of-the-covid-agenda-is-jewish/
I found a link as well...
Two things:
1. When the lone Covid viral spike protein gene is expressed as viral protein in ANY of the formerly healthy product-compromised cells, sensors inside those cells detect the presence of A. viral mRNA and B. viral protein translated from that viral mRNA and puts out an alert to the innate immune system to the effect of, “Hey, I’ve been infected by a virus that’s in its replication phase. Launch an innate immune inflammatory attack and kill me before these fuckers get out and infect more cells.” And the innate immune system unleashes inflammatory hell to kill the compromised cells and what appears to be all the viruses they contain. They actually contain no viruses, just copies of the same single viral gene and LOTS of copies of the full-length, physiologically-useless but biologically-active viral protein, but the cell doing the signaling and the innate immune system acting on the signal don’t know that. They are just responding to the minimum necessary conditions needed to signal viral compromise.
Of course, the spike protein can go on to provoke other immune responses.
2. It’s been demonstrated in human liver cells treated with the Pfizer viral RNA product that cellular reverse transcriptase can transcribe viral mRNA into a DNA-encoded form and insert it into the nuclear genome of that cell. Thus, it has the same potential as genital herpes, fever blisters (another herpes simplex), and chickenpox (herpes zoster) to be transcribed from its DNA-encoded form into mRNA and then sent out to the factory floor for protein manufacture.
The others have ALL the proteins made to create new complete viruses that can go on to infect others. The lone viral gene just makes a lone viral protein that won’t infect anyone. But from the POV of the internal cell sensors and the innate immune system responding to them, it still looks exactly like a virus in replication phase and the response is the same.
Things to take away from this:
A. Since the viral RNA products are indiscriminate and infect any cells of any organs they come into contact with, the result of cellular reverse transcriptase would be periodic, ongoing expression of the spike protein and inflammatory events typical of whatever tissue is affected; thus, it would create the appearance of exacerbating existing autoimmune conditions, though it’s really not.
B. Existing autoimmune conditions may themselves be the tissue specific expression of lone viral genes of whatever tissue-specific virus had infected them at one time or another. Doctors look for signs of the putative infectious agent, find none, and say “autoimmune disorder.” In reality, they may just not have been looking for a single viral gene.
C. The problem with the viral RNA products is their indiscriminate nature, meaning one could give rise to many different apparent autoimmune conditions in a wide variety of organs and tissues and all on different timetables and with different triggers for expression.
Call the viral RNA products the Swiss Army knives of “autoimmune disorders.”
Such is my lone gene theory of autoimmune disease I wrote about several months ago.
My question was really did he or did he not? We need to know this and go from there. We can’t diagnose if we don’t know