132 Comments

Yeah, rejoiced when I read the news! As the author of Government Gangsters (book, also film) he's well equipped to clean out the vipers in the FBI.

Hegseth, don't know. My initial reaction was that women should not be compelled to fight in combat. It's not like we have normal fertility rates anymore. We're in deep trouble with both plummeting sperm counts even in young males and fertility problems in females. And the Clot Shots of course made both worse.

A society should focus on the health and viability of future generations, as well as their cultural inheritance. The Constitution and Bill of Rights must be secured and implemented.

Expand full comment

nice post, educational, thank you

Expand full comment

My pleasure Paul.

Expand full comment

hugs! as we wage this battle.

Expand full comment

That's what it's all about - ALL FOR ONE, AND ONE FOR ALL !

Expand full comment

There has been a decline in the global fertility rate since 2021 which would be great news to Bill Gates. You can repopulate even if most males are wiped out but it's much more difficult to repopulate if there are few fertile females left.However, feminists have been increasing ever since C-sections became widely available and they should definitely be compelled to fight in combat. They are well suited to roles such as clearing minefields etc.

Expand full comment

Oh my. 😆

Expand full comment

Yikes!

Expand full comment

Hey Doc....just a friendly reality check.....women should not be in combat roles, in infantry, in my opinion. Great in machines, like Tulsi Gabbard, terrorizing the skies, or possibly sneaking around in submarines, sinking enemy ships and such, even in tanks. But...what would be the outcome of a platoon of infantry girls, bayonets attached, out of ammunition, tired, dehydrated, scared, some pregnant, some with PMS, facing a frontal assault by hardened, fit battle ready men, twice their weight and physical strength. I personally would not allow it if I was in charge, because they would be unlikely to survive in hand to hand combat. Look at the mismatches in sports...girls get their butts kicked by trannies....how would they fare against real men? Just sayin' not looking for a feminist fight here. Thoughtful use of resources by intelligent people, not ESG and DEI (sick) proponents. The idea of a fight is to win. Pitting ideological girls against hardened male killers is not a wise use of personnel. Fire all the upper brass, or send them to Leavenworth.

Expand full comment

I could agree but the woman must say that, will never go down right from a man...if a man says it he will be criticized, but if a woman, she wont be labelled as sexist...he has major issues to add to sexism

Expand full comment

President Trump had the courage to say, in a rally just days before the election, paraphrasing:

'I was told not to say this. But I will anyway. I am going to protect women.'

Expand full comment

Trump's statement (paraphrased above) received a big, positive response from the huge crowd.

Expand full comment

True Doc. You have skill in this dangerous arena. Politics is a perilous road. Yet, we now need men that tell the truth for a change, to be in power, we do not need smooth talking men with ulterior motives and conflicted interests representing us. Thanks for illuminating the difference Doc. Hegseth is not a politician...thank God... but he will need God's help to get past the Lefties politically, as you point out.

Expand full comment

hhhmmm

Expand full comment

Feminists, along with chickenhawk RINOS, but not normal women, should definitely be in the front line, serving as cannon fodder, clearing minefields etc

Expand full comment

You are very funny, AwakeNotWoke...I love your comment. I vote for YOU as top General. Good call.

Expand full comment

ANW is always on the money

Expand full comment

white spaces

Expand full comment

AwakeNotWoke...could you check your screen, and tell me if some of the writing on your perfect comment has been written over...it appears to have been double struck, obliterating the words "along with chicken hawk" and also the word "definitely". Your comment was perfect before I wrote a reply to Dr. Alexander, then the screen went wonky...I think it is a hack. Who would be capable of doing this?

Expand full comment

seems that post is still there....I am copying and pasting "Feminists, along with chickenhawk RINOS, but not normal women, should definitely be in the front line, serving as cannon fodder, clearing minefields etc"

Expand full comment

Thanks Doc, yes the post is still O.K.

Expand full comment

For me, I must edit to abbreviate a reply to avoid the "Reply" button becoming superimposed upon the "3 dots" of the post underneath, making the "Reply" button nonfunctional.

Expand full comment

Thanks Kathleen, that seems to be the issue.

Expand full comment

No David but if I try to post anything longer than a few lines it is very difficult and the "reply" function does not work and sometimes then the lines are written over. It's happening to other people too.

Expand full comment

This started happening when the "3 dots" were moved from the right of the "like, reply, share" line to the right of the screen name. (Change for the sake of change, disrupting function.)

Expand full comment

That's mainly what happens to me too.

Expand full comment

I will try it a different way to see if it can be bypassed. Thanks again.

Expand full comment

I've started splitting my longer posts, writing (continued or cont) at the end of the first part and the beginning of the second.

Expand full comment

For me, I must edit to abbreviate a reply to avoid the "Reply" button becoming superimposed upon the "3 dots" of the post underneath, making the "Reply" button nonfunctional.

Expand full comment

Me too.

Expand full comment

Likewise.

Expand full comment

That's been happening to me too. I guess someone doesn't like us putting the truth out there.

Expand full comment

It's discouraging. On purpose, I suspect.

(It's happening across the Substack platform. Not only on Dr. Paul's 'stack.)

Expand full comment

I guess we are cutting too close to the truth. We are indeed coming for them.

Expand full comment

Thanks AwakeNotWoke, that seems to be the case. No hacker.

Expand full comment

This began when the "3 dots" were moved from the right of the "like, reply, share" line to the right of the screen name. (Change for the sake of change, disrupting function.)

Expand full comment

Wholeheartedly agree, David.

Expand full comment

Retired military here. Women should not serve in combat.

Expand full comment

a man cant say that, a woman like you can...that is what he does not grasp

Expand full comment

hhhmmm, this is very interesting from you and so can you help us, please explain...I mean I and many can come up with reasons why they should but you have experience direct.

Expand full comment

so you think in supporting roles but not in combat? I could agree but we need to flesh this out based on experience and you are the expert.

Expand full comment

Supporting roles in combat are fine. Flying combat missions with female pilots and crew are also OK.

Real combat, like the face to face kind, is a disadvantage to women. Lack of upper body strength for one. How can a 125 pound woman carry an injured or wounded 200 pound guy out of a dangerous situation to safety? She can't.

Expand full comment

I am saying he having that position openly in a military that has women in combat will do damage and he has to find a way out of that box

Expand full comment

a man cant say that but a woman can...thats where he has foot and mouth hand looks like frisky proclivities. he must know his lane...might be 100% but its not his place to say that even if right...the right people e.g. women can broach the discussion and then we table it in full...we live in a world today where that type of statement will disqualify you...it may here

Expand full comment

I will not criticize him for his comments about women in combat.

Why? Because he is a combat veteran, both in Iraq and Afghanistan. He has seen firsthand what war does to people. It's blood and guts and watching your friends die a horrible death.

Unless we have been in that situation, we have absolutely no clue about the horrors our military troops have faced.

Expand full comment

I am so sick and tired of the PC correct idiots in the military and the Pentagon. Men and women in uniform who think there are more than 2 genders and support drag queen story hour and what pronouns to use.

Give me a plain spoken man, one who doesn't give a sh*t about political correctness. And if he offends people, so what? Too bad.

Expand full comment

boom

Expand full comment

So glad to hear your opinion, KJ.

I entirely agree.

Expand full comment

I agree with YOU! You should know of all people.

Expand full comment

In the way Kash talked in the past he will clean out the FBI well. Excellent choice.

Expand full comment

yes

Expand full comment

Let's wait and see. The qualifications to run the FBI are far more than just cleaning out the FBI. It's a Federal police force. He needs to know how to run a police force, and he needs to know the laws. I'm not sure that he qualifies. Time will tell. At this point, the only "qualification" that I see is that he praises Trump. That's an easy way in for anyone. So let's just wait and see.

Expand full comment

Each state has a police force. Ditto cities and towns and many counties. The money saved can be spent by localities needing beefed up budgets & manpower.

Expand full comment

Let’s keep him in our prayers.

& the entire incoming administration.

Expand full comment

yes, strong prayers

Expand full comment

It's about time I smiled! Honorable man for sure!

Expand full comment

yes, thank you for this post

Expand full comment

Correct!

Step 1, use a chainsaw and machete on the FBI to dismember it to the bone ... get rid of all the rot and corruption. Kash Patel has the *potential* to be the man for that job.

Step 2, Rebuild with good, Constitutional-abiding personnel.

Step 3, use that FBI to REALLY go after the politicians, bankers, and corporate Fat Rat criminals that have been screwing this country and its people for *decades*. When that round-up of Fat Rats begins, watch as cowardly Rats exit this country en masse.

Step 4, hunt them down wherever they may have fled. Bring them back to the US for trial.

Step 5, confiscate every dime of what they've looted. Use that money to reduce the national debt.

Step 6, take them to trial and throw the book at them. Make them PAY for what they've done. No concessions, no mercy -- never forget, these monsters have stolen *trillions* and also *killed millions* -- they fully deserve the punishments.

Step 7 -- The USA is now ready to be GREAT again. We can NEVER "be great" without first eliminating the Fat Rats from our society. If they remain free, they'll simply drag us back down.

Expand full comment

excellent post and step by step guide: "Step 1, use a chainsaw and machete on the FBI to dismember it to the bone ... get rid of all the rot and corruption. Kash Patel has the *potential* to be the man for that job."

Expand full comment

Step 3, use that FBI to REALLY go after the politicians, bankers, and corporate Fat Rat criminals that have been screwing this country and its people for *decades*. When that round-up of Fat Rats begins, watch as cowardly Rats exit this country en masse.

Expand full comment

this one I love ..."Step 4, hunt them down wherever they may have fled. Bring them back to the US for trial."

Expand full comment

Step 5, confiscate every dime of what they've looted. Use that money to reduce the national debt.

Expand full comment

I see your point re fat rats first.

Expand full comment

now this is the best suggestion and sign post forward: Step 6, take them to trial and throw the book at them. Make them PAY for what they've done. No concessions, no mercy -- never forget, these monsters have stolen *trillions* and also *killed millions* -- they fully deserve the punishments.

Expand full comment

Definitely Trump's best pick yet! And the more MSNBC et al. screech, the more you can be sure the pick is a great one!

Expand full comment

boom

Expand full comment

A "boom" from Dr. Paul is a badge of honor, LOL

Expand full comment

so pleased to hear this news - Kash deserves this.

Expand full comment

yes

Expand full comment

Love Cash pick! Pray for the Guardian Angels protection for President Trump his family and the new incoming cabinet picks🙏

Expand full comment

boom

Expand full comment

Does anyone reading this post actually believe that Trump’s name isn’t in Epstein’s little black book?

Expand full comment

what does that have to do with this? you mean will the FBI under Kash deal with it?

Expand full comment

It has everything to do with this. You call Epstein a sicko (on that we can agree), and shared the quote with which I assume you agree, that the FBI has and should release the names in the little black book (again, we agree). But at the same time, you are so enamored with Trump that you aren’t able to see him for what he actually is, and so I must assume that you (and other supporters) don’t think his name is in the black book. Or, even worse, perhaps you and others do think it is, but that means that none of you care. You will continue to believe he is something more than a fellow sicko, and that he is someone who is capable and worthy of the office of President, despite all of his abhorrent behavior.

Expand full comment

Go away.

Expand full comment

thanks

Expand full comment

If it were, it would certainly have been leaked by now. You may also be confusing Epstein's little notebook in which he listed names and contact info for people he would like to connect with, his wishlist, so to speak, with the actual logs of visitors to Epstein's island.

Expand full comment

The FBI would have no reason to care who Epstein socialized with in a normal way. In the context of the comment, we understand the little black book to mean the list of men who visited his island for the purpose of participating in illegal sexual acts.

Expand full comment

DR. ALEXANDER I S GREAT. AND, SOMETIMES WAYYYY TOOOO K I N D TO MURDERERS….!!! MURDERERS SHOULD NEVER BE GIVEN EXONERATION, …

ESPECIALLY, … PURPOSEFUL —-

M U R D E R E R S ….!

Expand full comment

Men and women are different. Both mentally and physically.

Combat is not something I would want to see anyone go through. It's horrific and life-changing and that person will never be the same.

There are approximately 22 veterans that kill themselves each day. The total changes a little bit depending on who is studying it or doing the reporting.

So many injured vets out there. Not just physical injuries but also psychological injuries.

We can't keep doing this to our troops.

Expand full comment

such a huge important post...thank you...for all you do and did and for helping us here

Expand full comment

much respect

Expand full comment

I think people are forgetting in all the preamble to the Trump 2.0 admimistration that Trump's picks for the various positions... AG, FBI, DNI, DOD, etc cannot operate in a silo and must be able to safely crosstalk with each other in order to be truly effective at gutting the Deep State (sorry.. couldnt help adding the safe and effective jab just for fun.....jab. Ha ha!).

Seriously, the impending illegal immigrant deportation will require a whole of govt approach...same with all the rest of Trump's stated agenda. His picks must be able to work well together.. no prima donnas. So we must...Trump must...view Trump's picks in totum not just as individuals. As such, there CANNOT be a weak link in the chain. The Deep State WILL exploit the weakness...to the pount they will likely confirm a weak link tha they can control (controlled opposition).

Expand full comment

excellent remarks here...in that regard Kash will be a strong link

Expand full comment

So, he's the fifth person from India put in this administration, that is including the wife of JD Vance, Usha, who as Vance states, "she has learned how to manage me." Has anyone vetted Kash? Doubtful. He is a big shot in the globalist Pilgrim Society just like Usha Vance. It's early members were all the One World Order folks and the members today are exactly the same. They are the sewer rats from all over the world.

Expand full comment

hhhmmm....so you think Kash is not optimal?

Expand full comment

I think, in fact know that his Indian status is not a rate limiting step...ethnicity, religion, must not disqualify unless you are of a religion of hate and violence. India is an ally to USA...Modi is one of Trump's closest allies and visited the WH under Trump most than any other leader...India is needed to keep China in a cage...and Pakistan...I dont know much about him but from what I have seen he seems strong as a pick.

Expand full comment

India has been pulling off all kinds of stunts to get their people into our country, to take our jobs. Most if it is illegal. Sorry, but I just don't trust them at all.

Expand full comment

I know many many Indian people, Hindu, warm, beautiful, smart, passionate and loyal people...among the best. humble...like any society they have their rift raft but great people....poverty and disease wracks it still e.g India varanasi is the seat of cholera and malaria etc.

Expand full comment

That doesn't give them the right to use fraudulent measures to get into country. They DO take jobs from our own people. Our own graduates are pushed aside, and Indian people are hired. They are subsidized by our government, so they are cheaper for the corporations to hire. Then they are given leadership roles, and only hire their own people. This is all well proven, and it's all WRONG!!! No excuses for them. They need to clean up their own country.

Expand full comment

He's American by birth. Just like you, and me.

Expand full comment

boom

Expand full comment

Sorry, you're both wrong. Kash was an anchor baby and if you knew the truth about the 14th amendment, you would understand that just because he was born here, that doesn't makes him a citizen.

Section 1 of the 14th Amendment doesn’t grant citizenship status to everybody who is born here. When Congress passed it, they specifically discussed that it wouldn’t make American Indians US citizens even though they were born here. That was because Indians weren’t “subject to the jurisdiction of the United States” – they were subject to the jurisdiction of their Tribes.

When the French ambassador’s lovely wife gives birth to a child here, that child is not “subject to the jurisdiction of the United States” – the child is subject to the jurisdiction of France.

When illegal aliens breach our Borders and invade our land, and then give birth here, their children are not “subject to the jurisdiction of the United States” because the parents are here illegally. Their children are subject to the jurisdiction of the Country the invaders left. That’s why all of them can be (and should be) deported. The children are not US citizens.

When American Missionaries, or Diplomats, or military personnel, etc. have a child born abroad, their child is NOT subject to the jurisdiction of the Country in which the child is born. Their child is born a US Citizen. This is an ancient Principle.

Even Rep. Chip Roy's SAVE Act violates Section 1 of the 14th Amendment because it provides that anyone born here is a “US Citizen” and will be eligible to vote in federal elections. So, the children of those 10 to 40 million illegals who have invaded our Country would be eligible to vote in all federal elections. The child of the French ambassador and his Wife would be eligible to vote here – and I expect under French law, the child would be eligible to vote in France as well.

(Just like Dr. Mehmet Oz is a citizen of both Turkey and America and votes in both countries.) Even Pompeo said Oz is a security risk because of this.

Senator Jacob Howard, who introduced the 14th Amendment's citizenship clause, said its grant of citizenship WOULD NOT INCLUDE PERSONS BORN IN THE UNITED STATES WHO ARE FOREIGNERS OR ALIENS.

Expand full comment