His main thrust here seems to be contamination and pollution. But he will clearly get drawn into debate on the climate science, hopefully in a good way. I don't see him as a fanatic but someone who needs to hear more from other climate scientists and scholars on long cycle earth eras of cooling and warming that could be spuriously correl…
His main thrust here seems to be contamination and pollution. But he will clearly get drawn into debate on the climate science, hopefully in a good way. I don't see him as a fanatic but someone who needs to hear more from other climate scientists and scholars on long cycle earth eras of cooling and warming that could be spuriously correlated with any current century trends in warming. I don't think he is advocating for social credit on climate in any way as are the globalists. Nor banning gas stoves or closing nuclear plants or mandating 15 minute cities for example. The views are far more nuanced. Interestingly we are hearing so much more on the complete lack of evidence that we are in a warming phase or that the poles are warming, they are cooling again apparently. Thanks for the link Sandra.
I'm not one of those people. I do support the work of Randall Carlson, Robert Schoch and colleagues on the history of earth geological cycles, solar and celestial activity and historical catastrophism. From those perspectives human carbon has nothing to do with earth climate fluctuations. Carbon has nothing to do with pollution.
I wish more people followed the work of Randall Carlson and Robert Schoch--their information is fascinating. And I certainly wish more knew about historical catastrophism.
His main thrust here seems to be contamination and pollution. But he will clearly get drawn into debate on the climate science, hopefully in a good way. I don't see him as a fanatic but someone who needs to hear more from other climate scientists and scholars on long cycle earth eras of cooling and warming that could be spuriously correlated with any current century trends in warming. I don't think he is advocating for social credit on climate in any way as are the globalists. Nor banning gas stoves or closing nuclear plants or mandating 15 minute cities for example. The views are far more nuanced. Interestingly we are hearing so much more on the complete lack of evidence that we are in a warming phase or that the poles are warming, they are cooling again apparently. Thanks for the link Sandra.
Gorebull Warmers say pollution and include carbon. Get over it and stop being fooled.
I'm not one of those people. I do support the work of Randall Carlson, Robert Schoch and colleagues on the history of earth geological cycles, solar and celestial activity and historical catastrophism. From those perspectives human carbon has nothing to do with earth climate fluctuations. Carbon has nothing to do with pollution.
I wish more people followed the work of Randall Carlson and Robert Schoch--their information is fascinating. And I certainly wish more knew about historical catastrophism.
Like the Electric Universe and The Thunderbolts Project groups.