"Their purpose appears to have been twofold: firstly, to get us to lay off criticizing Robert Malone, even though he’s the one suing and attacking us, and secondly, to stop us from talking about the Kennedy/Malone relationships. "
Nice little trick. What came first, the personal attacks, or the lawsuit. Yet, this wording implies otherwise…
"Their purpose appears to have been twofold: firstly, to get us to lay off criticizing Robert Malone, even though he’s the one suing and attacking us, and secondly, to stop us from talking about the Kennedy/Malone relationships. "
Nice little trick. What came first, the personal attacks, or the lawsuit. Yet, this wording implies otherwise. If the Breggins had not personally attacked Malone, there would be no lawsuit.
"We believe if Malone had broadcast that information any time after January 2020, it would have been picked up by the press and potentially prevented millions of COVID vaccine injuries and deaths that continue to emerge today."
Utter nonsense and shame on anyone promoting this fantasy. When Malone went public he was absolutely attacked by the media and anyone who was talking to him was also attacked (i.e. Joe Rogan). Dr Yeadon came out very early in 2020 saying that the vaccines were going to be dangerous and there was no need for them. As former C-level Pfizer exec you would think he would have garnered some media attention? Nothing. Nada.
For Breggins to assert that Malone saying something in 2020 would amount to anything is pathetic revisionism and fantasy.
I also find it stunningly naive for people to claim an inventor of something 20 years prior will be privy to inside knowledge of the details of derivatives of that invention despite 20 years of advancement and changes. Again, there seems to be a big break from reality here.
This still looks like an academic dispute over the psychology of totalitarianism and a bunch of hurt egos trying to stake a permanent claim over a newer grass roots movement which is reacting to the public health disaster of the prior 3 years.
big egos and personal attacks. Very sad on all counts TBH.
"Their purpose appears to have been twofold: firstly, to get us to lay off criticizing Robert Malone, even though he’s the one suing and attacking us, and secondly, to stop us from talking about the Kennedy/Malone relationships. "
Nice little trick. What came first, the personal attacks, or the lawsuit. Yet, this wording implies otherwise. If the Breggins had not personally attacked Malone, there would be no lawsuit.
"We believe if Malone had broadcast that information any time after January 2020, it would have been picked up by the press and potentially prevented millions of COVID vaccine injuries and deaths that continue to emerge today."
Utter nonsense and shame on anyone promoting this fantasy. When Malone went public he was absolutely attacked by the media and anyone who was talking to him was also attacked (i.e. Joe Rogan). Dr Yeadon came out very early in 2020 saying that the vaccines were going to be dangerous and there was no need for them. As former C-level Pfizer exec you would think he would have garnered some media attention? Nothing. Nada.
For Breggins to assert that Malone saying something in 2020 would amount to anything is pathetic revisionism and fantasy.
I also find it stunningly naive for people to claim an inventor of something 20 years prior will be privy to inside knowledge of the details of derivatives of that invention despite 20 years of advancement and changes. Again, there seems to be a big break from reality here.
This still looks like an academic dispute over the psychology of totalitarianism and a bunch of hurt egos trying to stake a permanent claim over a newer grass roots movement which is reacting to the public health disaster of the prior 3 years.
big egos and personal attacks. Very sad on all counts TBH.
Remember when leaked dooccumts in Europe outed harms from the vaccine early on. No one cared or listened.