Yes, I'm the one who committed wrong think by expressing concerns about RFK Jr. and posting a short clip of Allison's where she made some extremely important points about the first chapter of his book. I was reprimanded for not joining the group think/hopium bandwagon and for not accepting him as our savior. It was truly shocking!! I've …
Yes, I'm the one who committed wrong think by expressing concerns about RFK Jr. and posting a short clip of Allison's where she made some extremely important points about the first chapter of his book. I was reprimanded for not joining the group think/hopium bandwagon and for not accepting him as our savior. It was truly shocking!! I've never seen anything like that before--all of the sudden a number of substacks flipped from being places for sharing opinions without drama, to full blown propaganda outlets for political campaigns. I'm not familiar with Tessa Lena doing the same (I think I recently became a free subscriber to her substack and then there was a strange post questioning whether the person you support is with the CIA)
I saw that too. Strange. I think the reference was that whoever “Margie” is sometimes comes up as a different name. I was saying she had a right to ask questions without being vilified. Tessa was defending Malone and Nass. And it was over the top with her suggesting that anyone asking questions is doing damage to the “unity” of the MFM. I believe there are some definite legitimate questions that need answering. And I am not CUA. Lol. Tereza ended up quoting me in her substack using my response to Tessa. Celia banned me from her substack for defending Alison. And then let me back on—although I said I’d pass. CosmoAgent may have asked her to do that. But I don’t want to be part of groupthink so that is a hard pass for me.
Tereza Caraggio had a good post yesterday, where she posted a video and read some of her comments to Tessa Lena--she made a lot of good points in it, basically saying that given all that hangs in the balance, we should not prioritize false unity in the MFM over asking serious questions. Truth be told, I don't know how anyone could support Malone. It truly seems like the MFM is being sabotaged from within (Diana West had a good post on that). As for Celia, I can't say I'm shocked at her banning you. She also apparently banned a guy named "Allen," who I don't know, except for reading some of his comments which are excellent and make valid points. After taking the time to respond to Celia's insanity (e.g. those who question RFK are deceived, working for someone or full of despair) and never getting a response, I realized that nobody over there was actually interested in a rational discussion of serious issues. It was just a massive group think operation. And fwiw, I'm actually a clinical psychologist, and I've never seen that amount of gaslighting, manipulation, deception and outright dishonesty--it was really shocking. So, obviously, I never went back.
Yes, I'm the one who committed wrong think by expressing concerns about RFK Jr. and posting a short clip of Allison's where she made some extremely important points about the first chapter of his book. I was reprimanded for not joining the group think/hopium bandwagon and for not accepting him as our savior. It was truly shocking!! I've never seen anything like that before--all of the sudden a number of substacks flipped from being places for sharing opinions without drama, to full blown propaganda outlets for political campaigns. I'm not familiar with Tessa Lena doing the same (I think I recently became a free subscriber to her substack and then there was a strange post questioning whether the person you support is with the CIA)
I saw that too. Strange. I think the reference was that whoever “Margie” is sometimes comes up as a different name. I was saying she had a right to ask questions without being vilified. Tessa was defending Malone and Nass. And it was over the top with her suggesting that anyone asking questions is doing damage to the “unity” of the MFM. I believe there are some definite legitimate questions that need answering. And I am not CUA. Lol. Tereza ended up quoting me in her substack using my response to Tessa. Celia banned me from her substack for defending Alison. And then let me back on—although I said I’d pass. CosmoAgent may have asked her to do that. But I don’t want to be part of groupthink so that is a hard pass for me.
Tereza Caraggio had a good post yesterday, where she posted a video and read some of her comments to Tessa Lena--she made a lot of good points in it, basically saying that given all that hangs in the balance, we should not prioritize false unity in the MFM over asking serious questions. Truth be told, I don't know how anyone could support Malone. It truly seems like the MFM is being sabotaged from within (Diana West had a good post on that). As for Celia, I can't say I'm shocked at her banning you. She also apparently banned a guy named "Allen," who I don't know, except for reading some of his comments which are excellent and make valid points. After taking the time to respond to Celia's insanity (e.g. those who question RFK are deceived, working for someone or full of despair) and never getting a response, I realized that nobody over there was actually interested in a rational discussion of serious issues. It was just a massive group think operation. And fwiw, I'm actually a clinical psychologist, and I've never seen that amount of gaslighting, manipulation, deception and outright dishonesty--it was really shocking. So, obviously, I never went back.