The PCR cycle threshold (CT) is not an absolute value nor diagnostic of any disease causing pathogen. It is simply a numerical value chosen that when used with appropriate clinical indications for the test, can substantiate that the clinical symptomology is likely caused by the detected patho…
The PCR cycle threshold (CT) is not an absolute value nor diagnostic of any disease causing pathogen. It is simply a numerical value chosen that when used with appropriate clinical indications for the test, can substantiate that the clinical symptomology is likely caused by the detected pathogen. The PCR primers (e.g. N, S, ORF1b) simply identify homologous viral RNA segments and afford amplification cycles of those segments to a given CT. Each primer does not have same CT. None of the primers can differentiate a pathogenic intact virus from non-pathogenic fragments of virus. None provide any predictive or prognostic information. None define an active infection irrespective as to what CT value is deemed to indicate a positive test. None demonstrate to a high likelihood that the "positive" test result will demonstrate concomitant cell culture viropathic features of an intact, actively replicating virus.
The PCR test was the laboratory keystone in as much the PREP Act was to legal keystone ensuring near absolute immunity from litigation
Both were two of the many compartments within the plandemic compartmentalized operation.
There were key people assigned to each compartment to ensure operational success. There were also many useful idiots whos involvement provided the plausible deniability for the key persons.
Asymptomatic testing was in my opinion the glue that held the plandemic together. Without it, the plandemic would have fallen apart quickly. Feel free to list all the collateral societal level damage that resulted from asymptomatic testing. It is truly Biblical in extent and degree.
Asymptomatic testing via PCR should have never ever occurred. Ever.
My two cents...restricted to SARSCov2 testing.
The PCR cycle threshold (CT) is not an absolute value nor diagnostic of any disease causing pathogen. It is simply a numerical value chosen that when used with appropriate clinical indications for the test, can substantiate that the clinical symptomology is likely caused by the detected pathogen. The PCR primers (e.g. N, S, ORF1b) simply identify homologous viral RNA segments and afford amplification cycles of those segments to a given CT. Each primer does not have same CT. None of the primers can differentiate a pathogenic intact virus from non-pathogenic fragments of virus. None provide any predictive or prognostic information. None define an active infection irrespective as to what CT value is deemed to indicate a positive test. None demonstrate to a high likelihood that the "positive" test result will demonstrate concomitant cell culture viropathic features of an intact, actively replicating virus.
The PCR test was the laboratory keystone in as much the PREP Act was to legal keystone ensuring near absolute immunity from litigation
Both were two of the many compartments within the plandemic compartmentalized operation.
There were key people assigned to each compartment to ensure operational success. There were also many useful idiots whos involvement provided the plausible deniability for the key persons.
Asymptomatic testing was in my opinion the glue that held the plandemic together. Without it, the plandemic would have fallen apart quickly. Feel free to list all the collateral societal level damage that resulted from asymptomatic testing. It is truly Biblical in extent and degree.
Asymptomatic testing via PCR should have never ever occurred. Ever.