I still think it's dangerous to use *their* tactics. One reason is because later they can - and will - use that against you.
Yes, we have qualified women. Tulsi G comes to mind. My point is that if a (marginally) qualified woman is option A and a (superior) qualified man is option B, then to select A because of gender is a mistake. If the…
I still think it's dangerous to use *their* tactics. One reason is because later they can - and will - use that against you.
Yes, we have qualified women. Tulsi G comes to mind. My point is that if a (marginally) qualified woman is option A and a (superior) qualified man is option B, then to select A because of gender is a mistake. If the best option is female then, yes, select her.
There are some tactics that they use that we *should* use, but most people are put off by it. I'm referring to FORCE. Playing "nice", as Trump did during 2017-2020, is not going to get the job done. These creatures are filthy thugs that play dirty and violent any time they wish. I pleaded with Trump to turn up the heat -- Trump never did. The rest is history.
Fight fire with fire or lose .... those are the two options.
I still think it's dangerous to use *their* tactics. One reason is because later they can - and will - use that against you.
Yes, we have qualified women. Tulsi G comes to mind. My point is that if a (marginally) qualified woman is option A and a (superior) qualified man is option B, then to select A because of gender is a mistake. If the best option is female then, yes, select her.
There are some tactics that they use that we *should* use, but most people are put off by it. I'm referring to FORCE. Playing "nice", as Trump did during 2017-2020, is not going to get the job done. These creatures are filthy thugs that play dirty and violent any time they wish. I pleaded with Trump to turn up the heat -- Trump never did. The rest is history.
Fight fire with fire or lose .... those are the two options.