68 Comments

Which Law, which Constitution grants immunity to Frauds? None. Not even the immunity law signed by Pres. Reagan. So, all these evil firms should be sued royally.

Expand full comment

You think they are just trying to save their own butts by doing this? I think it makes them look either ignorant or incompetent and neither are good qualifications for a doctor!!

Expand full comment

Hang them in the public square.

Expand full comment

Dr. Alexander, I well know that you and many others have been speaking out for a long time now. What I am finding as I transcribe censored and shadow-banned videos of 2021 (and also 2022 and into 2023) is that more people spoke out than one might have guessed. Massive, massive respect for those who did!

Expand full comment

Many of the media and news corporations were in on this during the planning stages that started decades ago and have been running interference and providing cover all of that time. It is not only the CEOs of the pharmaceutical companies that are handcuffed but also the CEOs of those media and news organisations, because without their protection these crimes could not have been committed.

Expand full comment

It is SO PAINFUL waiting for the world to open their eyes and wake up.

Expand full comment

Let the backtracking $ blame game begin.

NO forgiveness from me. Bastards!! I want heads on a platter ....

Expand full comment

So that mean we can all sue Pfizer for fraud????

Expand full comment

May they be held accountable before the law. (I'm sounding like a broken record, I know it.)

Expand full comment

Give them another two or three years and perhaps they'll come out with the incredibly stunning revelation that the injections maybe weren't safe after all.

Expand full comment

Hi Kathleen, Julia Smith Gibbons was wrote the majority opinion in the 6th Circuit Court of appeals that restored the CMS vaccine mandate. The mandate had been stayed by judge Doughty of the 5th Circuit after he took testimony from doctors McCullough and Bhattacharya. Gibbons ignored all that and wrote that “we cannot second guess the Secretary” referring to HHS Secretary Becerra, the same idiot who called a professional basketball player, who refused the shots, a “flat earther.” Maybe Kyrie Irving? I forgot the name. The name-calling by Becerra was well covered in MSM. The HHS appeal warned of “grave danger” to workers if they don’t get the shots. Gibbons never required the gov’t to prove their “grave danger” assertion and the plaintiff lawyers did not demand it. That’s how it looks to me. Everybody was panicked about the hospital fatalities, taking for granted it was all ‘cuz of “the virus.” No one pointed out patients were dying from incompetent “Standard of Care.” I believe this transpired after Brian Ardis had interviewed with Mike Adams (Brighteon) on remdesivir toxicity. But the information travels slowly when it is censored by MSM.

Expand full comment

Confirmation of what Naomi’s team found. Good to hear it from an additional source. Thank you.

Expand full comment

If fraud has been committed then it negates any and all contracts absolving anyone from liability - in other words ALL covid 19 manufacturers are equally liable for prosecution as are any and all persons involved with the manufacture of the products as well as any and all persons involved with the administration of those products

This is slam dunk against Pfizer/ moderna / Astra zeneca / j&j et.al

Constitutional maxims : no loss no harm no injury no fraud

Expand full comment

Yes there are charges and concerns, “we have been saying this,” etc. The real objective is this: what is the argument IN COURT that leaves the judge NO PLACE TO HIDE. This means the complaint made against Moderna (etc.) is not covered by the statutory structures that so far have protected them. “We just gave the DOD what they asked for. Don’t blame us.”

Such an argument misses, for example, licensing the company’s name to sell the witch’s brew cooked up by the DOD to the public. There was no informed consent because the garbage in the syringe was not manufactured to Pharma industry (or any industry) with customary quality controls. Far from it. This deception was violation of the EUA. Why was this not revealed to the public and MSM? The vials are full of unacceptable SHIT. Nobody said a word about it. Not even the FDA. The average citizen just might have said “Hmmm, not taking that.” Even Dems? Hard to say.

Moreover the FDA committees that gave EUA approval to the shots AND to remdesivir KNEW FULL WELL that the massive hospital fatalities were the consequence of hospital protocols. Therein was the “public emergency” that had Gibbons and Sotomayor wetting their robes, accepting HHS statements without challenge. And the lawyers DID NOT GET IT.

This is just one argument of criminality. The JUDGE only looks at the narrow complaint presented and will not bring up other problems even if he/she sees them.

The lawyers for the plaintiff must be better prepared.

Expand full comment

I believe that the fake trials were unbounded by any normal medical practices and limitations. Meaning that whatever substance was produced, it was going to end up being injected into humanity without question. The FDA was nothing more than a shadow in the wind invited to the injection parade to promote the sense of authority and officialdom. After 27 months, they are responsible for murdering millions.

Expand full comment