Malone sues Dr. Jane Ruby for 25 million $, alike the Breggins; why? All I could ask is, why? Just thought you should know. All these people suing, what is wrong with them? This is censoring, chilling
Malone sues Dr. Jane Ruby for 25 million $, alike the Breggins; why? All I could ask is, why? Just thought you should know. All these people suing, what is wrong with them? This is censoring, chilling
speech between scientists and doctors...after this, the suit on Breggins, no one will be brave to talk anymore; this is very destructive to the Freedom movement; Stew Peters fame Jane Ruby sued??
Apparently Malone isn’t worried about legal fees. Malone goes around the country using lawsuits as threats toward anyone who disagrees with him publicly. Hopefully Malone will be undermined by his own aggression somehow.
Dr. Robert Malone, had a long record in the bioweapons complex (10 billion dollars in grants 2012-2017 1). Some ask: is it legal and ethical to appropriate patents, when the funding camos from the taxpayer and is supposed to benefit the taxpayer, not the researcher who cashed his wage?
Dr. Malone “the original inventor of mRNA vaccination as a technology, DNA vaccination, and multiple non-viral DNA and RNA/mRNA platform delivery technologies. He holds numerous fundamental domestic and foreign patents in the fields of gene delivery, delivery formulations, and vaccines, including for fundamental DNA and RNA/mRNA vaccine technologies.” 2
Does Malone receive royalties from Pfizer and Moderna for any of his 57 mRNA patents3, some of which are essential for lipid nanoparticles (there are 1814 patents related to Malone and nanoparticles)? Couldn’t he block them from using his patents in making haccines? If he could, wouldn’t he be accomplice to genocide. By denying this without giving reasons, he left the accusations open.
24 Jun 2021 he twitted supporting traitor Andrew Hill calling for more evidence on ivermectin (there were thousands of proven cases along a year and there was no harm trying!): “PLEASE pay attention to Dr. Andrew Hill. He is a very solid and mature data scientist. We speak often, and I have complete confidence in him and his team. Evidence-based medicine, not hype.” Malone was replied: “Sorry Dr. Malone, you must have missed Tess Lawrie statement around her private conversation with Dr. Hill where he admitted pressure from sponsors was the cause of his bogus conclusions.“ He didn’t answer. 4
Some say that it is strange that Malone says he got vaccinated after getting COVID: why wouldn’t an expert like him rely on natural immunity and repurposed drugs? Why would he take an EUA experiment, having worked for decades with mRNA for the Department of Defence and CIA, and knowing the failure in cancer patients and the risk of ADE? In early 2022 he was still supporting vaccinating the elderly and high risk, while working for a Bio-defence contract. 5 It seems he never gave a public apology.
He sued freedom fighters like the Breggins, Dr. Peter McCullough (America Out Loud) and Dr. Jane Ruby for 25 million dollars each, instead of leading a class action against the social media that censored him and millions (Twitter, Linkedin, etc.). 6 Some say this is exactly what a false flag does: block anyone contesting his official narrative. For instance, the Breggins were criticizing Mattias Desmet’s mass formation theory: “The Desmet/Malone Ideology of Mass Psychosis Blames the Citizens and Not the Global Predators“.7 On the contrary, Malone has leaded global congresses in many countries, where he accused global corruption. Still, he refuses to mention “conspiracy”. By suing and not giving explanations, Malone left the accusations open.
If you search for the word “conspiracy” in Malone’s substack, you’ll only find disbelief in such. For example, he reposted Desmet, who lays the burden on the people (in spite of denying it), through 3 factors:
1. A mechanistic ideology chosed by the individual: “the dominant ideology is mechanistic in nature. This ideology derives its appeal from the utopian vision of an artificial paradise (see chapter 3). The world and mankind are a machine and they can be comprehended and manipulated as such. The hitches in the machine that cause suffering can be “repaired.” In the long run, it will even be possible to eliminate death. Moreover, all this can be done without man having to reflect on his role in his own misfortune, without questioning himself as a moral and ethical being.” “The puppet master is the ideology, not the elite.”
2. An elite staying in power by doing and giving what the masses want: “Plans and visions for the future are not so much “forced” on the population. In many ways, the leaders of the masses—the so-called elite—give the people what they want. When fearful,the population wants a more controlled society.”
Note: he says that in spite of recognizing the media was instrumental into creating fear !!!
3. Manipulation: “mass-formation can emerge in a more or less spontaneous way (as happened in the first stages of Nazism in Germany) or that it can be artificially provoked through indoctrination and propaganda (as in the former Soviet Union). In this process, both the elite and the population itself shoulder responsibility—the first because they actively manipulate the population and the second because they prefer to stay blind and, ultimately, commit atrocities towards those who don’t join them.”
Note: it’s another proof of censorship of truth, that people like Desmet seem still unaware of who chose the leaders and funded the initial steps of Nazism and the Soviet Revolution as if that isn’t proof of conspiracy.
Desmet concludes: “examples that seem to point in the direction of a plan being implemented, such as: the fact that the definition of “pandemic” was changed shortly before the corona crisis; the definition of “herd immunity” to imply that only vaccines can achieve it;the counting method for corona deaths was adjusted by the WHO so it was higher than the number of flu deaths; that the registration methodology of vaccine side effects led to serious underestimation (by, for example, labelling those that become apparent during the first fortnight after vaccination as not vaccine-related); that all key political positions when the crisis started were held by politicians who were pro-technocracy (all people referred to as the World Economic Forum’s Young Global Leaders). These are examples of how an ideology gets a grip on society, not evidence of the execution of a conspiracy.
The enemy is not another human being, the enemy is primarily a certain view of man and the world, a mechanist-rationalist-materialist way of thinking; not another human being.
If you analyse a situation only in terms of conspiracies, in which an evil elite is the one and only cause of the misery, then the inevitable conclusion is that this elite must be destroyed through a violent revolution. Such a revolution, however, would most probably lead to the radical destruction of the ‘freedom movement’ itself. It would, indeed, rather be a Godsent gift for the elite, as it justifies destruction of the opposition through harsh repression.”8
Desmet is right on 2 things:
1. The people shares responsibility, but in a much much lower degree than the elite which has the support of the armed forces (including the police).
2. Revolution is a double edged sword. The same as color revolutions, the French Revolution proved how they could be ignited and lead to imposte a mason Emperor (Napoleon). The French yellow jackets and the Brazilian uprising to the 2022 stolen elections, prove that the people can’t achieve anything by themselves if there’s not a huge majority and leadership capable of prison, like Gandhi.
In sum, either Malone and Desmet were fooled or they are trying to fool us... into the magical belief that this is a spontaneous yet coordinated process across nations and that there’s nothing else to do except talking us to extermination. Some argue that Malone is the fooled and Desmet is the fooler because he uses half truths to structure a lie. Yet, he might just be a fooled repeating structured foolishness.
9 Jan 2023. Musk Twitter was still censoring and shadow banning COVID posts and refused to reinstate many accounts from truthers, yet Twitter reinstated Malone’s account (with many others like Kirsch and McCullough). According to Dr. Ruby’s screenshots 9, Twitter blocked her for posting “What is The Malone Doctrine?”: why would Twitter support Malone by banning Dr. Ruby?:
2 Feb 2023. Malone called for a ban on mRNA and DNA COVID injections, 3 years late. Also, by Jan 2020, Malone had shown that, the same as with SARS-Cov-1 and MERS where they caused ADE in animal testing, they were too dangerous for humans, even experimentally: because of the ADE risk, they should thoroughly be tested on animals. 10 He never mentioned this study until accused by the Breggins in Feb 2023.
Comment from CCMDMS: “How does anyone who is "controlled" break free, when trying means being ripped to shreds by the "freedom" fighters? You are forcing people back into the welcoming arms of the globalists this way. Please stop it. There is no need to fear "controlled opposition." The truth will set you free, not make you into vindictive monsters. Stop acting like the globalists. This internal witch hunt is precisely the Civil War type disunity they promote.” 11
I can go with that but that isn’t the same as a lawsuit against Peter. Frankly if Malone did that I think he’d lose many people. Dr. McCullough is frontline healing people and that is a true hero.
No,but once I find a major mistake in what is being said I question what else is incorrect. I don’t have time to sort it out. I have read plenty that is said negative about him and I still don’t think he’s the devil but there are things I don’t like.
How does it logically follow that ceasing to read a propaganda piece or hatchet job containing what appear to be demonstrable falsehoods, possibly lies, indicates a lack of interest in the truth about the target of the propaganda piece or hatchet job, Karen?
It says something about the motives and integrity, or lack thereof, of the writer.
When I read propaganda from bureaucrats stating that the mRNA jabs stop transmission of SARS-CoV-2, I stop reading.
You have made an "argument by mere assertion."
I doubt you could back it up without resort to ad hominems or other forms of sophistry, but I expect you'll either evade an answer or will resort to that.
The article below is just one of many. So I guess GLK made the case against Malone that you and Julie criticized. I suggest people do their research before they discredit stories as being untrue. Malone is controlled opposition and is still working with the enemy while making us all think he is on our side. All the while he is milking $$$$ from both sides.
I completely understand what confirmation bias is. I stopped because it was an accurate statement, and that made me question the validity of the rest of it. It is not right to spread false information about lawsuits.
Yeah that's been in the back of mind ever since he was on the Dark Horse podcast. When he said he worked on DoD contracts little red flags immediately went up because I know what's required for that and how captured businesses get in that relationship.
Vilma, I have decided to think like you, to a small extent at least. I'm not yet completely paranoid, but I am at least being rather vile at times, and more prepared than previously to think the worst of people, on the basis of ambiguous evidence. Note my conspiratorial thinking in this post below, which I wrotevin response to Dr. Alexander's most recent stack on Malone;
It's a budding trend alright Mr. Rappoport. Now Dr. Mark Skidmore is suing the editorial board of BMC Infectious Diseases and its publisher Springer for, not only breach of contract, but also defamation over the decision of the editorial board to retract his paper in which he concluded that the coronavirus vaccines had taken the lives of approximately 300,000 Americans by the end of 2021.
To make matters worse, Steve Kirsch is funding the lawsuit, claiming that the defendants must be held accountable.
I have also called for Dr. Malone to drop his lawsuit.
However, I don't want to engage in "the fallacy of special pleading" here, so for consistency, and I urge everybody else to do the same, I am now also calling on Dr. Skidmore, and Steve Kirsch, to drop their lawsuit against Springer and the editorial board of BMC Infectious Diseases.
Dr. Skidmore, I urge you, accept the retraction and get over it.
Don't be such a narcissist.
There are more important things than your hurt feelings over the imputation that those who speak out against the mRNA gene injection fraud shots have engaged in scientific misconduct, have made egregious errors or are being unethical.
Live with these imputations.
Get over yourself.
It does not matter if your scientific reputation is diminished any more than it matters that Dr. Malone's has been.
And also, let me just add, I don't like the cut of your jib, or the way you raise your eyebrows, and I think you're a big Pharma shill and no better than Hitler, of whom you are an admirer, and you are a pedophile and controlled opposition, a thoroughly evil human being, likely with connections to DTRA/DTC.
"It's time we hold these people accountable; let the lawsuits begin. I'm going to pay for the lawsuit to sue Springer and their corrupt editorial board at BMC Infectious Diseases for their decision to retract the Skidmore paper; the most popular paper in their history."
Take drugs for your paranoia😉 As little Ben Shapiro says "facts don't care about your feelings." Plenty of researchers and internet sleuths have researched Dr. DTRA Malone's record of performance- including his change in cadence when speaking (now vs old videos) - tricks learned from one of his clients (captured from one of his many scrubbed web pages). Once a Frankenstein, always a Frankenstein just ask his girlfriend, Rick Bright, they have a very long, mutually beneficial relationship. Both are Frankensteins.
Psyops folks never do serious attacks against their own agents, only lightweight ones. He was attacked by every avenue and so was anyone who supported him.
If anyone is looking like controlled opposition it's Breggins and Stew Peters
You're a combination of Jill Malone and Shannon Joy😂😂 no one is attacking the tiny turd, they're reminding him of the history he and Jill continue to erase. They can't hide from the facts no matter how hard they try.
Kirsch is less of a threat because he comes from the financial world and has no credentials on health in the public eye.
Malone was attacked and every attempt to silence him was made by all the mechanisms. Joe Rogan nearly got taken off the air because he had him on.
NYTimes, TheAtlantic and WaPo all running hit pieces on him.
Blackrock and the music industry try to shut Rogan down.
Google censored Mass Formation Psychosis.
But no one cares if Stew Peters and Breggins keep talking about global conspiracies. Sure they fact check them, but no one tries to silence what they're saying.
What does that tell you about who the deep state really fears and who is likely controlled opposition?
Yes, and he was attacking medicine on their handling of the pandemic without the credentials. They know that's not a big threat when the general public won't listen to anyone except doctors. Malone threatened the heart of the pharmaceutical product being pushed, because he was from that world with the credentials that the average person would respect.
That's why they attacked his credentials very early on.
One must be so vigilant and wary about everything nowadays.... more than ever. Or maybe awareness of that need is just part of aging....for some of us anyways. Keep observant.🤨
The problem is that Malone was involved in a lot of the creation of this bio weapon and he knows A LOT more about what is in this poison than he has ever let on to the public. That is totally unacceptable. I saw an interview a while back with Stew Peters and Dr. Malone and Malone said there are things he cannot talk about to protect his career. And Stew Peters ripped Malone a new butt over that statement. Right there and then I knew my gut feeling about him was right. You should read Dr. Alexander's substack that came out today about Karen Kingston.
The weird thing to me is that to whatever degree Malone was involved in mRNA development, he CLAIMS he got the vaccine. If he really knew how evil it was, why on earth did he take the vax? Or did he really take it?
You got that straight......I will never take that shot. BUT I knew long before COVID that ALL vaccines were meant to make people sick not healthy. Cure mealses but create SIDS, autism, allergies, anxiety, IBS, asthma on and on and on. It is a fact that vaccinated children are much way less healthy than kids who never got vaccinated.
A very good friend of mine retired from the military and he too got the barrage of shots and he was sick every time he got one. The flu shot.....he got the flu every year and was very ill. He has been retired now almost 10 years. No vaccines. Hasn't been sick since he got out of the service.
I ask myself the same question and it is quite possible that he never did take it. I am sure neither Gates, Biden, Bancel, Bourla, Tedros, Fauci etc etc never took that shot but told us they did.
You are not alone and I guess I was too altruistic also but then these are all people too with egos, and a desire for fame. I think the real medical and health pros are getting separated from the media wannabes.
This is a prime reason to not trust Malone. You don't sue your fellow doctors unless he is guilty and he doesn't want people to know it. This is very wrong. He could have asked for a public apology but to sue shows exactly what the governments of the world want - censorship and no critical thinking. I thought that was how you learned, taught each other and received the better results in record time.
It's the other way around. You can't sue someone successfully if they speak truth. He's suing them because they put up attack websites against him with false information and wouldn't take it down.
Did you read his lawsuit? It's all outlined very clearly.
They Breggins have stated what's on his resumes plus data that he and Jill have wiped off the web but that some smart researchers have preserved. If the Malones have nothing to hide they wouldn't be scrubbing the web from their "record of performance" (that's Fed talk).
Both the Malones are bullies. "It's not going to end well" - Malone to Kariko, in writing. The tiny turd have a humongous ego.
How do you invite someone who setup a hit website against you to debate?
Breggins made the serious accusation that Malone committed crimes against humanity. How would you debate that with someone who was going on video and saying that about you?
"[Malone] is in the middle of every horrific thing that has happened to humanity. He is an operative running interference to keep this thing going."
That's not on any resume nor on any website I've seen from Malone or otherwise.
"The pernicious effects of the Desmet/Malone ideology"
The theory and book are Desmet's, not Malones. Do you have evidence to the contrary?
"Dr. Malone was “in the middle of” the “suppression of
hydroxychloroquine”. Dr. Malone is engaged in deliberate “fraud” to
“blind us to the predators”. “He’s a protector of the predators’."
Evidence? Certainly not on a resume or scrubbed from the web.
"Not going to end well".
Seriously, if you think that's a threat then you might be a little fragile yourself. That can have one million contexts. I can say very confidently, the pandemic isn't going to end well, and neither is this infighting. It's not going to end well, and that's not a threat, it's a projection of the outcome.
Again, they're repeating what Malone has in his resumes. He brags about being involved in every "emergency" since AIDS. As Housatonic has clearly pointed out, if Malone were a decent human being he would admit to his involvement in the AIDS disaster - millions of humans around the world have died because of our NIH/DOD parasites. Maybe do some research instead of regurgitating the bullshit of the coward who whines about stolen valor when he lacked the cojones to serve in our military.
You can claim plenty in a lawsuit - does that make it true.......according to both parties they deny that. Why is Malone the speaking head of .Dr. Cole, and I forget the other names....but they were all out front early in the game and now Malone is the talking head - how did he get there. How did he become the voice and these people seem to be quiet now. There is more to this.
Sorry are you doubting the claims? They have links to validate them.
Which claim are you doubting? Please be specific.
Breggins and Stew Peters have been around forever, and they weren't attacked by the deep state when this started, so that should indicate who is the real threat.
Malone was an insider and switched, that's why they think he's the real threat. Stew Peters is so full of hyperbole, I think they let him go on because he is controlled opposition. He makes so many errors, he makes the movement look crazy. That's why he gets left on the air. Oh, they'll fact check him to death, but they want him spewing half nonsense to make everyone look bad.
I followed Malone from the very beginning, when he came on the scene. He actually walks through his own story in detail in numerous podcasts. Have you listened to any of them?
George, yesterday I listened to RFK Jr’s second interview with Sasha Latypova, titled “Militarized Healthcare”, on The Defender podcast. If Robert Malone was as “deep in the belly of the beast” as he has stated, then surely he was aware from the beginning that the shots aren’t being manufactured by Phizer and Moderna, but that rather the Pentagon and DOD paid for the rights to use those names and slap them on the vials. Under “Other Transaction Authorization” the shots have been and are being manufactured by military defense contractors and haven’t been tested AT ALL. Peter Marks and Janet Woodcock knew this and I find it hard to believe Malone didn’t. The shots are described in government documents as biological weapons. If Sasha Latypova was able to discover all of this without being in the belly of the beast, it beggars the imagination to think Malone hasn’t known all along. As far as I’m concerned he has a lot of questions to answer, and he’s trying to quell inquiry, dissent, and criticism of his narrative... just like social media and the legacy media have done to anyone who dares question the official Covid narrative, or the “safety and effectiveness” of the so-called mRNA shots.
Let me clarify: RFK Jr and Sasha Latypova don’t mention Malone at all in the discussion about militarized healthcare. He doesn’t figure into the conversation in any way, and RFK Jr is a staunch supporter of Malone. I’m simply explaining, as requested, one of my several reasons for feeling uneasy about Malone.
How on earth would someone else know the other person's inside connections?
"was in... " He may have been in and then out. That's how inside connections work. They're not guaranteed, and if they don't want to leak information, they won't. What nonsense to take one's own experience and assume someone else is exactly the same. That organization is huge, I'm sure people on the inside didn't all know what was going on.
That discussion sounds like these folks are 100% speculating. That's it.
If you read the lawsuit, he's actually trying to stop some very specific accusations, not questions. Did you read it?
What questions do you think he has to answer? In every podcast I've listened to with him, he's quite open answering questions and explaining. I've found him to always be quite open about what he got wrong too.
His lawsuit is full of fluff. The tiny turd had his humongous ego busted because he was running his mouth about subject matters he knows nothing about and that Breggin is an expert in. Breggin has a lifetime history of saving lives, Malone has a lifetime history of participating in the creation of poisons that hurt us and our children. His involvement with Anthrax is something he will never be able to scrub off the internet.
Frankly, I think almost all of them are controlled. You don’t plan a world takeover like this without controlling every single part of the script. I don’t think Dr. Bragging is because he’s been against Pharma (Psychiatry) for Decades. Pharma definitely has intense hatred for Dr. Breggin. But the Rest are probably in one way or another, a part of the script.
The biggest argument against Malone is that he files these lawsuits. I still don’t understand why he does it or how he benefits. It’s odd unsettling and exasperating.
Seriously? You didn't even bother to read it. It doesn't require a law degree to read slander accusations. You simply have to read them and they're very easy.
For example, this is one of the quotes from Breggins.
"Malone IS Dangerous. I knew from day one, this man is in the middle of
every horrific thing that has happened to humanity."
Does Breggins have evidence that Malone was in the middle of every horrific thing that has happened to humanity? Does he have evidence of even one single thing?
Do you really need a lawyer to decide if Breggins' quote was accurate?
"Dr. Malone is responsible for the “COVID Plandemic” and has
intentionally committed crimes against humanity."
Another quote, do you need a lawyer to help you figure out if Breggins has evidence to back up this very serious claim?
Nah, the lawsuit is full of fluff. The judges in his district are in his pocket. We see what he and his attorney are doing, he's exposed himself for being the Frankenstein we knew him to be.
I like your saying "become Ungovernable. Do Not Comply and make yourself hard to kill"--that last part "make yourself hard to kill" made me laugh, I guess dark humor, makes you realize the world is insane that this is what it has come to. We are literally the prey.
Oh, it's darker humor than you think :) What I had in mind was Trump's former Sec of Defense, former Marine General James Mattis, aka Mad Dog Mattis, when he said "have a plan to kill everyone you meet." Now that's dark humor, but he was referring to when his troops went to Iraq or Afghanistan. Sign up to my substack - you'll like it...
isn't it great that he's whined about Stolen Valor when he lacked the cojones to join our military? I'm waiting for him to apologize to our Vets but he won't, his overinflated ego won't allow it.
Wow that is brass. (I served, and I was an early reader of the Burkett book of that title. I’m not inclined to believe when a panhandler claims to be a veteran.) It’s astounding for a rich man who has served in the elite levels of our government health complex to appropriate the term Stolen Valor. Thanks for your answer.
Sounds like they are over the target 🎯. Malone? You have answers to give. You cannot sue us all. You cannot silence us all. Simply give an answer if there’s nothing to hide.
I have no respect for anyone who pursues this type of lawsuit. Even if slander/libel can be proven, it’s still a red flag for me. Turn the other greedy cheek and forgive whatever minor transgression has been committed.
What's wrong with Malone??? I would think he got enough money from is millions worth grants he procured from the DOD, CDC ecc. for his scientific work for and with them??!!! Is he any better than the other preditors??? Strange, I got an ambivalent impression of him from the start, was always questioning how come he didn't understand the basics: That if you turn cells into manufactures of foreign protein they automatically would be attacked by Killer T - Lymphocytes as any virus infected cell would be - and the consequences of such an autoimmune attack. How come he took the vaccine and only later realized it had severe side effects??? if anyone, HE should have know. Also, Prof. Bhakdi was warning about if from the start and about the formation of thrombosis, if the endothelial cells are the ones that take up mRNA and produce spikes. It was clear even before the role out - Prof. Bhakdi warned in Oct 2020! And then his sudden turn around. Also, I remember, I think it was in his interview on dark horse, that he claimed he didn't like to be in the lime light and that his wife was commending him to take up the challenge, since so many were turning to him for explanation ans help... seems he adapted to lime light very quickly... Can't he see that by his behaviour for suing others of the truth seekers and freemdom fighters of the medical community he betrays the cause he says he is fighting for??? How shameful for him!
Malone is deep state of that there is no doubt - he's gone beyond controlled opposition and he is the one that needs to be sued for lies more lies and for being an accessory to genocide
And that explains why every deep state mechanism has attacked him.
I think you need to look at this a lot more critically. He has literally been attack by the deep state since he came on the scene. That would place the other party as the controlled opposition.
I mean really, Dr Alexander is quoting The Atlantic, WashingtonPost and NYTimes? You're all going to side with those deep state propaganda arms?
The big question the Freedom Movement needs to ask: Why doesn’t Dr. Malone challenge these differing opinions in open scientific debate INSTEAD of throwing out lawsuits?
He has. Breggins setup an attack website with false claims and wouldn't take it down. How do you propose forcing someone else to stop propagating misinformation?
Malone is a menace to all of us.
Another piece of Shiite! Who does he think he is makes no sense whatever.....I guess he is part of that lack of humanity that
Wants to enslave us! There is a price hey for everything!
It's expensive to feed those fancy horses.
Apparently Malone isn’t worried about legal fees. Malone goes around the country using lawsuits as threats toward anyone who disagrees with him publicly. Hopefully Malone will be undermined by his own aggression somehow.
Yes. Speaking of expenses. Lawsuits aren’t cheap either. Yet he poormouths how much he’s lost since supposedly becoming a vax dissenter. Hmmmm?
Dr. Robert Malone, had a long record in the bioweapons complex (10 billion dollars in grants 2012-2017 1). Some ask: is it legal and ethical to appropriate patents, when the funding camos from the taxpayer and is supposed to benefit the taxpayer, not the researcher who cashed his wage?
Dr. Malone “the original inventor of mRNA vaccination as a technology, DNA vaccination, and multiple non-viral DNA and RNA/mRNA platform delivery technologies. He holds numerous fundamental domestic and foreign patents in the fields of gene delivery, delivery formulations, and vaccines, including for fundamental DNA and RNA/mRNA vaccine technologies.” 2
Does Malone receive royalties from Pfizer and Moderna for any of his 57 mRNA patents3, some of which are essential for lipid nanoparticles (there are 1814 patents related to Malone and nanoparticles)? Couldn’t he block them from using his patents in making haccines? If he could, wouldn’t he be accomplice to genocide. By denying this without giving reasons, he left the accusations open.
24 Jun 2021 he twitted supporting traitor Andrew Hill calling for more evidence on ivermectin (there were thousands of proven cases along a year and there was no harm trying!): “PLEASE pay attention to Dr. Andrew Hill. He is a very solid and mature data scientist. We speak often, and I have complete confidence in him and his team. Evidence-based medicine, not hype.” Malone was replied: “Sorry Dr. Malone, you must have missed Tess Lawrie statement around her private conversation with Dr. Hill where he admitted pressure from sponsors was the cause of his bogus conclusions.“ He didn’t answer. 4
Some say that it is strange that Malone says he got vaccinated after getting COVID: why wouldn’t an expert like him rely on natural immunity and repurposed drugs? Why would he take an EUA experiment, having worked for decades with mRNA for the Department of Defence and CIA, and knowing the failure in cancer patients and the risk of ADE? In early 2022 he was still supporting vaccinating the elderly and high risk, while working for a Bio-defence contract. 5 It seems he never gave a public apology.
He sued freedom fighters like the Breggins, Dr. Peter McCullough (America Out Loud) and Dr. Jane Ruby for 25 million dollars each, instead of leading a class action against the social media that censored him and millions (Twitter, Linkedin, etc.). 6 Some say this is exactly what a false flag does: block anyone contesting his official narrative. For instance, the Breggins were criticizing Mattias Desmet’s mass formation theory: “The Desmet/Malone Ideology of Mass Psychosis Blames the Citizens and Not the Global Predators“.7 On the contrary, Malone has leaded global congresses in many countries, where he accused global corruption. Still, he refuses to mention “conspiracy”. By suing and not giving explanations, Malone left the accusations open.
If you search for the word “conspiracy” in Malone’s substack, you’ll only find disbelief in such. For example, he reposted Desmet, who lays the burden on the people (in spite of denying it), through 3 factors:
1. A mechanistic ideology chosed by the individual: “the dominant ideology is mechanistic in nature. This ideology derives its appeal from the utopian vision of an artificial paradise (see chapter 3). The world and mankind are a machine and they can be comprehended and manipulated as such. The hitches in the machine that cause suffering can be “repaired.” In the long run, it will even be possible to eliminate death. Moreover, all this can be done without man having to reflect on his role in his own misfortune, without questioning himself as a moral and ethical being.” “The puppet master is the ideology, not the elite.”
2. An elite staying in power by doing and giving what the masses want: “Plans and visions for the future are not so much “forced” on the population. In many ways, the leaders of the masses—the so-called elite—give the people what they want. When fearful,the population wants a more controlled society.”
Note: he says that in spite of recognizing the media was instrumental into creating fear !!!
3. Manipulation: “mass-formation can emerge in a more or less spontaneous way (as happened in the first stages of Nazism in Germany) or that it can be artificially provoked through indoctrination and propaganda (as in the former Soviet Union). In this process, both the elite and the population itself shoulder responsibility—the first because they actively manipulate the population and the second because they prefer to stay blind and, ultimately, commit atrocities towards those who don’t join them.”
Note: it’s another proof of censorship of truth, that people like Desmet seem still unaware of who chose the leaders and funded the initial steps of Nazism and the Soviet Revolution as if that isn’t proof of conspiracy.
Desmet concludes: “examples that seem to point in the direction of a plan being implemented, such as: the fact that the definition of “pandemic” was changed shortly before the corona crisis; the definition of “herd immunity” to imply that only vaccines can achieve it;the counting method for corona deaths was adjusted by the WHO so it was higher than the number of flu deaths; that the registration methodology of vaccine side effects led to serious underestimation (by, for example, labelling those that become apparent during the first fortnight after vaccination as not vaccine-related); that all key political positions when the crisis started were held by politicians who were pro-technocracy (all people referred to as the World Economic Forum’s Young Global Leaders). These are examples of how an ideology gets a grip on society, not evidence of the execution of a conspiracy.
The enemy is not another human being, the enemy is primarily a certain view of man and the world, a mechanist-rationalist-materialist way of thinking; not another human being.
If you analyse a situation only in terms of conspiracies, in which an evil elite is the one and only cause of the misery, then the inevitable conclusion is that this elite must be destroyed through a violent revolution. Such a revolution, however, would most probably lead to the radical destruction of the ‘freedom movement’ itself. It would, indeed, rather be a Godsent gift for the elite, as it justifies destruction of the opposition through harsh repression.”8
Desmet is right on 2 things:
1. The people shares responsibility, but in a much much lower degree than the elite which has the support of the armed forces (including the police).
2. Revolution is a double edged sword. The same as color revolutions, the French Revolution proved how they could be ignited and lead to imposte a mason Emperor (Napoleon). The French yellow jackets and the Brazilian uprising to the 2022 stolen elections, prove that the people can’t achieve anything by themselves if there’s not a huge majority and leadership capable of prison, like Gandhi.
In sum, either Malone and Desmet were fooled or they are trying to fool us... into the magical belief that this is a spontaneous yet coordinated process across nations and that there’s nothing else to do except talking us to extermination. Some argue that Malone is the fooled and Desmet is the fooler because he uses half truths to structure a lie. Yet, he might just be a fooled repeating structured foolishness.
9 Jan 2023. Musk Twitter was still censoring and shadow banning COVID posts and refused to reinstate many accounts from truthers, yet Twitter reinstated Malone’s account (with many others like Kirsch and McCullough). According to Dr. Ruby’s screenshots 9, Twitter blocked her for posting “What is The Malone Doctrine?”: why would Twitter support Malone by banning Dr. Ruby?:
2 Feb 2023. Malone called for a ban on mRNA and DNA COVID injections, 3 years late. Also, by Jan 2020, Malone had shown that, the same as with SARS-Cov-1 and MERS where they caused ADE in animal testing, they were too dangerous for humans, even experimentally: because of the ADE risk, they should thoroughly be tested on animals. 10 He never mentioned this study until accused by the Breggins in Feb 2023.
Comment from CCMDMS: “How does anyone who is "controlled" break free, when trying means being ripped to shreds by the "freedom" fighters? You are forcing people back into the welcoming arms of the globalists this way. Please stop it. There is no need to fear "controlled opposition." The truth will set you free, not make you into vindictive monsters. Stop acting like the globalists. This internal witch hunt is precisely the Civil War type disunity they promote.” 11
More to be posted here:
http://ScientificProgress.Substack.com
I stopped reading when you said Malone sued McCullough. I think this is false.
If that stopped you from reading then your really aren't interested in the truth about Malone.
No. It means I will not waste time with incorrect information.
Malone has gone after McCullough. Perhaps not in a lawsuit but there is a reason you don't see them on the same stage any more.
I can go with that but that isn’t the same as a lawsuit against Peter. Frankly if Malone did that I think he’d lose many people. Dr. McCullough is frontline healing people and that is a true hero.
No,but once I find a major mistake in what is being said I question what else is incorrect. I don’t have time to sort it out. I have read plenty that is said negative about him and I still don’t think he’s the devil but there are things I don’t like.
How does it logically follow that ceasing to read a propaganda piece or hatchet job containing what appear to be demonstrable falsehoods, possibly lies, indicates a lack of interest in the truth about the target of the propaganda piece or hatchet job, Karen?
It says something about the motives and integrity, or lack thereof, of the writer.
When I read propaganda from bureaucrats stating that the mRNA jabs stop transmission of SARS-CoV-2, I stop reading.
You have made an "argument by mere assertion."
I doubt you could back it up without resort to ad hominems or other forms of sophistry, but I expect you'll either evade an answer or will resort to that.
Go ahead.
Make my case for me.
https://palexander.substack.com/p/malone-attacks-physician-scientists
The article below is just one of many. So I guess GLK made the case against Malone that you and Julie criticized. I suggest people do their research before they discredit stories as being untrue. Malone is controlled opposition and is still working with the enemy while making us all think he is on our side. All the while he is milking $$$$ from both sides.
What you have said is just so conspiratorial and weird Karen. Julie's argument is sound.
You stopped reading when you came across some information which was hurting your existing view of Robert Malone.
Read about "confirmation bias"..
I completely understand what confirmation bias is. I stopped because it was an accurate statement, and that made me question the validity of the rest of it. It is not right to spread false information about lawsuits.
What you did is what normal people do Julie. Malone touches on it in one of the videos in his series of ethics videos.
Well Scientific Progress is correct.
Malone is an insider speaking out and its not an easy thing to do.
It is ultimately the individuals responsibility. He wrote a book called "lies my government told me" to educste people.
I bet it was ghostwritten.
It hardly seems so, once reactivity subsides and reason returns.
https://merylnass.substack.com/p/breggin-and-malone-analysis-and-suggested?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email
https://merylnass.substack.com/p/the-deep-state-attack-on-robert-malone?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email
https://merylnass.substack.com/p/you-only-get-this-much-flak-if-you?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email
Perhaps I'm totally naive, but it seems to me the anti Covid-19 Fraudemic crowd should be cooperating with each other, every way they can..
Depends on whether or not they are still controlled by the CIA, DoD, DARPA, and BARDA.
"you can check out any time you like, but you can never leave."
Yeah that's been in the back of mind ever since he was on the Dark Horse podcast. When he said he worked on DoD contracts little red flags immediately went up because I know what's required for that and how captured businesses get in that relationship.
How does it profit a man if he gains the world and loses his soul?
-- Jesus
The most benevolent explanation I can think of is that he's trapped in circumstances due to long standing affiliations with the Monster.
Except if you actually believe the deep state is doing all this, then you know very well they used every asset they had to attack Malone.
They would not do that if he was one of theirs. That is inescapable logic.
LOL you obviously don't know how psyops work.
Vilma, I have decided to think like you, to a small extent at least. I'm not yet completely paranoid, but I am at least being rather vile at times, and more prepared than previously to think the worst of people, on the basis of ambiguous evidence. Note my conspiratorial thinking in this post below, which I wrotevin response to Dr. Alexander's most recent stack on Malone;
It's a budding trend alright Mr. Rappoport. Now Dr. Mark Skidmore is suing the editorial board of BMC Infectious Diseases and its publisher Springer for, not only breach of contract, but also defamation over the decision of the editorial board to retract his paper in which he concluded that the coronavirus vaccines had taken the lives of approximately 300,000 Americans by the end of 2021.
To make matters worse, Steve Kirsch is funding the lawsuit, claiming that the defendants must be held accountable.
I have also called for Dr. Malone to drop his lawsuit.
However, I don't want to engage in "the fallacy of special pleading" here, so for consistency, and I urge everybody else to do the same, I am now also calling on Dr. Skidmore, and Steve Kirsch, to drop their lawsuit against Springer and the editorial board of BMC Infectious Diseases.
Dr. Skidmore, I urge you, accept the retraction and get over it.
Don't be such a narcissist.
There are more important things than your hurt feelings over the imputation that those who speak out against the mRNA gene injection fraud shots have engaged in scientific misconduct, have made egregious errors or are being unethical.
Live with these imputations.
Get over yourself.
It does not matter if your scientific reputation is diminished any more than it matters that Dr. Malone's has been.
And also, let me just add, I don't like the cut of your jib, or the way you raise your eyebrows, and I think you're a big Pharma shill and no better than Hitler, of whom you are an admirer, and you are a pedophile and controlled opposition, a thoroughly evil human being, likely with connections to DTRA/DTC.
"It's time we hold these people accountable; let the lawsuits begin. I'm going to pay for the lawsuit to sue Springer and their corrupt editorial board at BMC Infectious Diseases for their decision to retract the Skidmore paper; the most popular paper in their history."
https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/its-time-we-hold-these-people-accountable
Take drugs for your paranoia😉 As little Ben Shapiro says "facts don't care about your feelings." Plenty of researchers and internet sleuths have researched Dr. DTRA Malone's record of performance- including his change in cadence when speaking (now vs old videos) - tricks learned from one of his clients (captured from one of his many scrubbed web pages). Once a Frankenstein, always a Frankenstein just ask his girlfriend, Rick Bright, they have a very long, mutually beneficial relationship. Both are Frankensteins.
This is really funny coming from someone who's siding with the NYTimes Atlantic, and WaPo.
You want me to take that seriously?
Psyops folks never do serious attacks against their own agents, only lightweight ones. He was attacked by every avenue and so was anyone who supported him.
If anyone is looking like controlled opposition it's Breggins and Stew Peters
You're a combination of Jill Malone and Shannon Joy😂😂 no one is attacking the tiny turd, they're reminding him of the history he and Jill continue to erase. They can't hide from the facts no matter how hard they try.
Fall guy....collateral damage??
Kirsch is less of a threat because he comes from the financial world and has no credentials on health in the public eye.
Malone was attacked and every attempt to silence him was made by all the mechanisms. Joe Rogan nearly got taken off the air because he had him on.
NYTimes, TheAtlantic and WaPo all running hit pieces on him.
Blackrock and the music industry try to shut Rogan down.
Google censored Mass Formation Psychosis.
But no one cares if Stew Peters and Breggins keep talking about global conspiracies. Sure they fact check them, but no one tries to silence what they're saying.
What does that tell you about who the deep state really fears and who is likely controlled opposition?
Do we have numbers? I think someone posted that Breggins has more book sales than Malone.
Yes, and he was attacking medicine on their handling of the pandemic without the credentials. They know that's not a big threat when the general public won't listen to anyone except doctors. Malone threatened the heart of the pharmaceutical product being pushed, because he was from that world with the credentials that the average person would respect.
That's why they attacked his credentials very early on.
yeah--controlled opposition
One must be so vigilant and wary about everything nowadays.... more than ever. Or maybe awareness of that need is just part of aging....for some of us anyways. Keep observant.🤨
Exactly Kathleen!!!!!!
The problem is that Malone was involved in a lot of the creation of this bio weapon and he knows A LOT more about what is in this poison than he has ever let on to the public. That is totally unacceptable. I saw an interview a while back with Stew Peters and Dr. Malone and Malone said there are things he cannot talk about to protect his career. And Stew Peters ripped Malone a new butt over that statement. Right there and then I knew my gut feeling about him was right. You should read Dr. Alexander's substack that came out today about Karen Kingston.
Stew Peters doesn't mince his words, that's for sure. One of the reasons why I like him.
Me too and he did not hold back on Malone. That is why Malone hates him.
The weird thing to me is that to whatever degree Malone was involved in mRNA development, he CLAIMS he got the vaccine. If he really knew how evil it was, why on earth did he take the vax? Or did he really take it?
I am not a medical professional and I had enough sense not to take the covid death shot.
You got that straight......I will never take that shot. BUT I knew long before COVID that ALL vaccines were meant to make people sick not healthy. Cure mealses but create SIDS, autism, allergies, anxiety, IBS, asthma on and on and on. It is a fact that vaccinated children are much way less healthy than kids who never got vaccinated.
In the military, I received every vaccine known to man except the anthrax vaccine.
So, I was never an anti-vaxxer.
But I knew something was just not right with covid and the covid death shot.
I will never take another shot again.
A very good friend of mine retired from the military and he too got the barrage of shots and he was sick every time he got one. The flu shot.....he got the flu every year and was very ill. He has been retired now almost 10 years. No vaccines. Hasn't been sick since he got out of the service.
I ask myself the same question and it is quite possible that he never did take it. I am sure neither Gates, Biden, Bancel, Bourla, Tedros, Fauci etc etc never took that shot but told us they did.
Really? Would you take a shot you KNEW was deadly just so you could travel??? Not buying that at all.
Agree.
You are not alone and I guess I was too altruistic also but then these are all people too with egos, and a desire for fame. I think the real medical and health pros are getting separated from the media wannabes.
This is a prime reason to not trust Malone. You don't sue your fellow doctors unless he is guilty and he doesn't want people to know it. This is very wrong. He could have asked for a public apology but to sue shows exactly what the governments of the world want - censorship and no critical thinking. I thought that was how you learned, taught each other and received the better results in record time.
It's the other way around. You can't sue someone successfully if they speak truth. He's suing them because they put up attack websites against him with false information and wouldn't take it down.
Did you read his lawsuit? It's all outlined very clearly.
They Breggins have stated what's on his resumes plus data that he and Jill have wiped off the web but that some smart researchers have preserved. If the Malones have nothing to hide they wouldn't be scrubbing the web from their "record of performance" (that's Fed talk).
Both the Malones are bullies. "It's not going to end well" - Malone to Kariko, in writing. The tiny turd have a humongous ego.
Why is it he has to sue? Why couldn't he just invite people to a debate?
He can't debate because he'll lose. He started the "controlled opposition" bullshit when Alex Berenson called him out. He's a weenie.
How do you invite someone who setup a hit website against you to debate?
Breggins made the serious accusation that Malone committed crimes against humanity. How would you debate that with someone who was going on video and saying that about you?
"[Malone] is in the middle of every horrific thing that has happened to humanity. He is an operative running interference to keep this thing going."
That's not on any resume nor on any website I've seen from Malone or otherwise.
"The pernicious effects of the Desmet/Malone ideology"
The theory and book are Desmet's, not Malones. Do you have evidence to the contrary?
"Dr. Malone was “in the middle of” the “suppression of
hydroxychloroquine”. Dr. Malone is engaged in deliberate “fraud” to
“blind us to the predators”. “He’s a protector of the predators’."
Evidence? Certainly not on a resume or scrubbed from the web.
"Not going to end well".
Seriously, if you think that's a threat then you might be a little fragile yourself. That can have one million contexts. I can say very confidently, the pandemic isn't going to end well, and neither is this infighting. It's not going to end well, and that's not a threat, it's a projection of the outcome.
Again, they're repeating what Malone has in his resumes. He brags about being involved in every "emergency" since AIDS. As Housatonic has clearly pointed out, if Malone were a decent human being he would admit to his involvement in the AIDS disaster - millions of humans around the world have died because of our NIH/DOD parasites. Maybe do some research instead of regurgitating the bullshit of the coward who whines about stolen valor when he lacked the cojones to serve in our military.
That's a fail. Please move on.
You can claim plenty in a lawsuit - does that make it true.......according to both parties they deny that. Why is Malone the speaking head of .Dr. Cole, and I forget the other names....but they were all out front early in the game and now Malone is the talking head - how did he get there. How did he become the voice and these people seem to be quiet now. There is more to this.
Sorry are you doubting the claims? They have links to validate them.
Which claim are you doubting? Please be specific.
Breggins and Stew Peters have been around forever, and they weren't attacked by the deep state when this started, so that should indicate who is the real threat.
Malone was an insider and switched, that's why they think he's the real threat. Stew Peters is so full of hyperbole, I think they let him go on because he is controlled opposition. He makes so many errors, he makes the movement look crazy. That's why he gets left on the air. Oh, they'll fact check him to death, but they want him spewing half nonsense to make everyone look bad.
I followed Malone from the very beginning, when he came on the scene. He actually walks through his own story in detail in numerous podcasts. Have you listened to any of them?
I’m trying to keep an open mind about Robert Malone, but he’s making it really difficult.
I was in the same place a few months ago.
I'm curious what aspect is making it difficult for you? Did you read the claims in his lawsuit. It's all clearly outlined and public.
George, yesterday I listened to RFK Jr’s second interview with Sasha Latypova, titled “Militarized Healthcare”, on The Defender podcast. If Robert Malone was as “deep in the belly of the beast” as he has stated, then surely he was aware from the beginning that the shots aren’t being manufactured by Phizer and Moderna, but that rather the Pentagon and DOD paid for the rights to use those names and slap them on the vials. Under “Other Transaction Authorization” the shots have been and are being manufactured by military defense contractors and haven’t been tested AT ALL. Peter Marks and Janet Woodcock knew this and I find it hard to believe Malone didn’t. The shots are described in government documents as biological weapons. If Sasha Latypova was able to discover all of this without being in the belly of the beast, it beggars the imagination to think Malone hasn’t known all along. As far as I’m concerned he has a lot of questions to answer, and he’s trying to quell inquiry, dissent, and criticism of his narrative... just like social media and the legacy media have done to anyone who dares question the official Covid narrative, or the “safety and effectiveness” of the so-called mRNA shots.
Let me clarify: RFK Jr and Sasha Latypova don’t mention Malone at all in the discussion about militarized healthcare. He doesn’t figure into the conversation in any way, and RFK Jr is a staunch supporter of Malone. I’m simply explaining, as requested, one of my several reasons for feeling uneasy about Malone.
I see. Thanks for clarifying.
I think one should feel uneasy about everyone with any remote association to any public messaging these days.
How on earth would someone else know the other person's inside connections?
"was in... " He may have been in and then out. That's how inside connections work. They're not guaranteed, and if they don't want to leak information, they won't. What nonsense to take one's own experience and assume someone else is exactly the same. That organization is huge, I'm sure people on the inside didn't all know what was going on.
That discussion sounds like these folks are 100% speculating. That's it.
If you read the lawsuit, he's actually trying to stop some very specific accusations, not questions. Did you read it?
What questions do you think he has to answer? In every podcast I've listened to with him, he's quite open answering questions and explaining. I've found him to always be quite open about what he got wrong too.
His lawsuit is full of fluff. The tiny turd had his humongous ego busted because he was running his mouth about subject matters he knows nothing about and that Breggin is an expert in. Breggin has a lifetime history of saving lives, Malone has a lifetime history of participating in the creation of poisons that hurt us and our children. His involvement with Anthrax is something he will never be able to scrub off the internet.
The experimental anthrax shots the military were forced to take is one of the reasons why we have Gulf War Syndrome.
Your responses are similar to disinformation agents. You had the opportunity to answer me on your thread, why are you answering for someone else?
Making ad hominem attacks to boot. Classic signs of controlled opposition.
The question(s) is did she push him to get the Moderna shot(s)? Did he even get it? I don't have the answers but I do have a lot suspicions.
I hate this infighting. The medical freedom doctors need to stand unified, even if they have private differences. This hurts everyone
Frankly, I think almost all of them are controlled. You don’t plan a world takeover like this without controlling every single part of the script. I don’t think Dr. Bragging is because he’s been against Pharma (Psychiatry) for Decades. Pharma definitely has intense hatred for Dr. Breggin. But the Rest are probably in one way or another, a part of the script.
The biggest argument against Malone is that he files these lawsuits. I still don’t understand why he does it or how he benefits. It’s odd unsettling and exasperating.
Read the lawsuit claims. It outlines very clearly why Malone is suing Breggins and others.
We all waiting for someone talented in interpreting legalese to summarize, George.
Seriously? You didn't even bother to read it. It doesn't require a law degree to read slander accusations. You simply have to read them and they're very easy.
For example, this is one of the quotes from Breggins.
"Malone IS Dangerous. I knew from day one, this man is in the middle of
every horrific thing that has happened to humanity."
Does Breggins have evidence that Malone was in the middle of every horrific thing that has happened to humanity? Does he have evidence of even one single thing?
Do you really need a lawyer to decide if Breggins' quote was accurate?
"Dr. Malone is responsible for the “COVID Plandemic” and has
intentionally committed crimes against humanity."
Another quote, do you need a lawyer to help you figure out if Breggins has evidence to back up this very serious claim?
I read it. Malone is Controlled Opp horse Manure.
Yeah, that's why you're all pointing to the NYTimes, Atlantic, and Washington Post as evidence.
Hmmm
During a battle, you shouldn't attack allies. I am afraid Malone sees only competition.
I could give the exact same argument about Breggins et al. In fact, he's the one with the competing theory to Desmet.
Nah, the lawsuit is full of fluff. The judges in his district are in his pocket. We see what he and his attorney are doing, he's exposed himself for being the Frankenstein we knew him to be.
The disinformation agent is still here. Hey, why don't you go read some more deep state propaganda. Your cover here is blown.
These suits put Malone in the dirty camp. He cares not a whit about the optics or the damage he is doing.
Malone is a crybaby.
I like your saying "become Ungovernable. Do Not Comply and make yourself hard to kill"--that last part "make yourself hard to kill" made me laugh, I guess dark humor, makes you realize the world is insane that this is what it has come to. We are literally the prey.
Oh, it's darker humor than you think :) What I had in mind was Trump's former Sec of Defense, former Marine General James Mattis, aka Mad Dog Mattis, when he said "have a plan to kill everyone you meet." Now that's dark humor, but he was referring to when his troops went to Iraq or Afghanistan. Sign up to my substack - you'll like it...
isn't it great that he's whined about Stolen Valor when he lacked the cojones to join our military? I'm waiting for him to apologize to our Vets but he won't, his overinflated ego won't allow it.
Malone whined about stolen valor? Meaning his valor as scientific inventor, or fake military heroes?
Stolen valor refers to our military not spoiled, entitled scientists who are supported by US taxpayers. Yes, he's on video claiming stolen valor.
Wow that is brass. (I served, and I was an early reader of the Burkett book of that title. I’m not inclined to believe when a panhandler claims to be a veteran.) It’s astounding for a rich man who has served in the elite levels of our government health complex to appropriate the term Stolen Valor. Thanks for your answer.
Cry bully.
Sounds like they are over the target 🎯. Malone? You have answers to give. You cannot sue us all. You cannot silence us all. Simply give an answer if there’s nothing to hide.
I have no respect for anyone who pursues this type of lawsuit. Even if slander/libel can be proven, it’s still a red flag for me. Turn the other greedy cheek and forgive whatever minor transgression has been committed.
It's an indicator of a really big ego at play, imo ...itself an indicator of a non-righteous person.
And worldly thinking.
Malone is a snake!!! People wake up!
Forked tongue snake
Yes, I truly don't know how people cannot see it. Mind boggling!!
What's wrong with Malone??? I would think he got enough money from is millions worth grants he procured from the DOD, CDC ecc. for his scientific work for and with them??!!! Is he any better than the other preditors??? Strange, I got an ambivalent impression of him from the start, was always questioning how come he didn't understand the basics: That if you turn cells into manufactures of foreign protein they automatically would be attacked by Killer T - Lymphocytes as any virus infected cell would be - and the consequences of such an autoimmune attack. How come he took the vaccine and only later realized it had severe side effects??? if anyone, HE should have know. Also, Prof. Bhakdi was warning about if from the start and about the formation of thrombosis, if the endothelial cells are the ones that take up mRNA and produce spikes. It was clear even before the role out - Prof. Bhakdi warned in Oct 2020! And then his sudden turn around. Also, I remember, I think it was in his interview on dark horse, that he claimed he didn't like to be in the lime light and that his wife was commending him to take up the challenge, since so many were turning to him for explanation ans help... seems he adapted to lime light very quickly... Can't he see that by his behaviour for suing others of the truth seekers and freemdom fighters of the medical community he betrays the cause he says he is fighting for??? How shameful for him!
Evil never has "enough".
Touché!
He said he needed it for travel.
So he would be injected with something he knows is death? For travel? Seriously?
Yes I know he said he did. I just don’t believe it.
I do not believe for one minute Malone actually took these bioweapons.
Same here.
No idea...just repeating what he said.
Ah so he booked a space flight with Elon? Well, how about he follows Odyssee 2000?!! Can‘t do much harm there anymore
Malone is deep state of that there is no doubt - he's gone beyond controlled opposition and he is the one that needs to be sued for lies more lies and for being an accessory to genocide
And that explains why every deep state mechanism has attacked him.
I think you need to look at this a lot more critically. He has literally been attack by the deep state since he came on the scene. That would place the other party as the controlled opposition.
I mean really, Dr Alexander is quoting The Atlantic, WashingtonPost and NYTimes? You're all going to side with those deep state propaganda arms?
Not to mention Blackrock and the music industry.
That's what you're doing.
Seems then they all need to file counter suits.
Well, if it does come down to taking a side Malone has made it clear which side he is on:
the ANTI science authoritarian mob tha has now highjacked mainstream science and is wrecking it
will he want to sue anyone who has lost all respect for him??
He acts lke a "woke" bully
Thank you Dr. Alexander. I appreciate your support and effort to bring this vexatious, frivolous lawsuit by Malone to the attention of the public.
The big question the Freedom Movement needs to ask: Why doesn’t Dr. Malone challenge these differing opinions in open scientific debate INSTEAD of throwing out lawsuits?
Doesn’t make sense!
He has. Breggins setup an attack website with false claims and wouldn't take it down. How do you propose forcing someone else to stop propagating misinformation?
Did you read the claims in the lawsuit?
Is your name Meryl?
Are you a troll?
That’s what we all are wondering.