That is a good point however, Dr. Malone & the other scientists involved in creating this technology still have a better understanding of how it works & possibly how to mitigate it.
That is a good point however, Dr. Malone & the other scientists involved in creating this technology still have a better understanding of how it works & possibly how to mitigate it.
I agree that having intimate knowledge is certainly helpful. The problem is the damage happens in various organs/systems and that causes a cascade of problems that require different treatments. Dr. Marik, Dr. Kory and the flccc folks invest a lot of time researching for answers and they are treating patients so their information isn’t just researched but also bedside clinical. End of the day you need to see clinical results. Dr. Malone is less likely than the FLCCC experts to succeed here. Paul Marik’s protocols saved many more people than standard of care yet he was forced out of his hospital for doing so. He still is passionate about trying to help the vaccine injured and those damaged by Covid. Those frontline guys are extremely valuable. Malone should lead the crusade to stop the gain of function mad science still being done. We are going to have another one of these events in the near future unless it stops. We need someone like him who has profited in this industry to stand up to it and join the doctors, researchers who have been worried about gain of function and trying to push back.
Stop the BS, the DOD-MIL who financed mRNA since day one, has said "It was always intended to be a bio-weapon delivery technology' ( 1980's tech is mRNA )
Covid was identified in 1936
Now you expect all the reality to be sugar-coated with BS that only a child would eat;
Malone said long ago in the ROGAN interview, the only reason he went public is that he started seeing players like Fauci getting billions, and he wanted his share of the loot;
Let's here you say it again, you listened to all 15,000 Rogan interviews, and the interviews that he did with Malone and you never heard Malone complain that he didn't get his share of the mRNA loot?? Did I get this right?
Do I have to post a link to the fucking video, and give you a time edit? But I would prefer to play the negative game and you prove that Malone never complained about not getting his fair-share for being the 'father of mRNA' ( a mil bio-weapon )
...
Just for fun could you post the link here to the Rogan/Malone interview you watched? Then I'll look & see if we're even talking about the same interview; Me thinks your a Jewess hag who needs to get back to Miami and cry a river;
I too question Malone due to his continued stance that the elderly and those with comorbidities should be in line for the jabs, when I believe that the elderly and those with comorbidities are likely to have the weakest immune systems and would be the most likely groups to be susceptible to the numerous serious adverse event outcomes known to be associated with the alleged Covid-19 jabs.
But, we shouldn't have to spend our time trying to verify something you say. If you have video recorded proof of Malone making such a "fair share of the loot" statement, provide us a link to the article or interview, and the time within the video of Malone's statement. In other words, back up your statement just like we do with references when we submit a paper for publication. We will then be able to further disseminate this information you are providing.
Let me give you an example:
Below is some very interesting information regarding Robert Malone's past participation in patented mRNA research which surfaced in a Stew Peters video recorded discussion with Karen Kingston. I'm pasting in a response I made on another substack thread:
The 1996 U.S. patent (2nd link below) which lists "Robert W. Malone" as one of the inventors, indicates synthetic mRNA in a "clot shot" can be encoded to produce various toxin peptides, such as cobra snake venom factor, ricin, diphtheria toxin, enterotoxin, etc. Once that mRNA enters your cell cytoplasm, ribosomes would translate it (like reading a ticker tape) into the actual peptide toxin(s), which your immune system would see as a toxic invader and mount an immune response. In other words, such a "clot shot" is meant to get you sick, as is explained by Dr. David Martin and Dr. Judy Mikovits to Canadian Constitutional attorney Rocco Galati and Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. in the following video:
[VIDEO] 'Dr. David Martin tells us this is not a vaccine but rather a medical device.'
Malone was 37 years old when the following 1996 U.S. patent 5,580,589 was issued; and, curiously, he has not spoken about his role in this research. He's listed next to last out of 5 researchers and, from what I remember when I was publishing in the 80s, next to last is a fairly prominent position on scientific articles...sort of like the Wuhan "bat woman" being listed immediately before UNC Chapel Hill's Ralph Baric on the 2015 Nature Medicine spike protein gain-of-funtion paper. I do not know whether the same holds true for patents.
This potential can of worms was opened by Karen Kingston, who appears to have been somewhat miffed by something Malone said, as she implies in the following video:
March 13, 2023
FOREIGN U.S. Biolabs EXPOSED! Russian General Igor Kirillov Cites Karen Kingston & Stew Peters!
Kingston at time = 19:41: "Yeah. Well, when you brought forward, and Dr. (Bryan) Ardis brought forward that there were snake venom peptides in the spike protein, that was true; and, it was confirmed by scientists out of the University of Pittsburgh, Germany, the Cedars-Sinai in LA. And the lung samples of people who died out of Lombardi, Italy...Europe's ground zero; and, they found there was cobra venom peptides and krait venom peptides, as well as glycoprotein 120 ( Ed Paré Note: I couldn't understand the next 5 or 6 syllables) in the spike protein. So, it is true."
"Now, the other thing that probably Dr Malone wants people to say, you know he's saying, "that's a crazy conspiracy theory" (Paré Note: I assume Kingston means about the presence of venom in the people who died of the jabs), is because in his 1996 patent (5,580,859) for creating non-mammal DNA inside of mammals..inside of humans, him and his co-inventors used his cationic liposome lipidnanoparticle specifically to express toxic peptides, including cobra venom factor and ricin. So, it's in Dr. Malone's best interest; you know, if it was his idea and he patented the ability for this technology to convert human cells; because it also says you can use the mRNA to code cells in the tissue to produce the polypeptides for less than about 20 days and usually less than 10 days. So, he invented the technology that can convert human cells and program them to produce toxins such as cobra venom, it's in his best interest to call you and I a conspiracy theorist and discredit it; because that's his only chance at not being accused of being a biowarfare terrorist. He has to say what, everything that he's done, that he doesn't want people to know about, is a conspiracy theory. - Does that make sense?"
Peters: "Makes sense, yeah."
(Ed Paré Note: According to Dr. Bryan Ardis, various toxic venoms cause symptoms identical to the symptoms alleged to be indicative of the alleged Covid-19 illness, including loss of taste and smell. Additionally, Ardis states that PCR tests will report these toxic venom peptides as a positive result for "Covid-19" 100 percent of the time.)
That is a good point however, Dr. Malone & the other scientists involved in creating this technology still have a better understanding of how it works & possibly how to mitigate it.
I agree that having intimate knowledge is certainly helpful. The problem is the damage happens in various organs/systems and that causes a cascade of problems that require different treatments. Dr. Marik, Dr. Kory and the flccc folks invest a lot of time researching for answers and they are treating patients so their information isn’t just researched but also bedside clinical. End of the day you need to see clinical results. Dr. Malone is less likely than the FLCCC experts to succeed here. Paul Marik’s protocols saved many more people than standard of care yet he was forced out of his hospital for doing so. He still is passionate about trying to help the vaccine injured and those damaged by Covid. Those frontline guys are extremely valuable. Malone should lead the crusade to stop the gain of function mad science still being done. We are going to have another one of these events in the near future unless it stops. We need someone like him who has profited in this industry to stand up to it and join the doctors, researchers who have been worried about gain of function and trying to push back.
That too.
Stop the BS, the DOD-MIL who financed mRNA since day one, has said "It was always intended to be a bio-weapon delivery technology' ( 1980's tech is mRNA )
Covid was identified in 1936
Now you expect all the reality to be sugar-coated with BS that only a child would eat;
Malone said long ago in the ROGAN interview, the only reason he went public is that he started seeing players like Fauci getting billions, and he wanted his share of the loot;
I listened to all 3 hours of the Rogan interview and you just proved yourself a liar. I invite others to listen too.
Let's here you say it again, you listened to all 15,000 Rogan interviews, and the interviews that he did with Malone and you never heard Malone complain that he didn't get his share of the mRNA loot?? Did I get this right?
Do I have to post a link to the fucking video, and give you a time edit? But I would prefer to play the negative game and you prove that Malone never complained about not getting his fair-share for being the 'father of mRNA' ( a mil bio-weapon )
...
Just for fun could you post the link here to the Rogan/Malone interview you watched? Then I'll look & see if we're even talking about the same interview; Me thinks your a Jewess hag who needs to get back to Miami and cry a river;
I too question Malone due to his continued stance that the elderly and those with comorbidities should be in line for the jabs, when I believe that the elderly and those with comorbidities are likely to have the weakest immune systems and would be the most likely groups to be susceptible to the numerous serious adverse event outcomes known to be associated with the alleged Covid-19 jabs.
But, we shouldn't have to spend our time trying to verify something you say. If you have video recorded proof of Malone making such a "fair share of the loot" statement, provide us a link to the article or interview, and the time within the video of Malone's statement. In other words, back up your statement just like we do with references when we submit a paper for publication. We will then be able to further disseminate this information you are providing.
Let me give you an example:
Below is some very interesting information regarding Robert Malone's past participation in patented mRNA research which surfaced in a Stew Peters video recorded discussion with Karen Kingston. I'm pasting in a response I made on another substack thread:
The 1996 U.S. patent (2nd link below) which lists "Robert W. Malone" as one of the inventors, indicates synthetic mRNA in a "clot shot" can be encoded to produce various toxin peptides, such as cobra snake venom factor, ricin, diphtheria toxin, enterotoxin, etc. Once that mRNA enters your cell cytoplasm, ribosomes would translate it (like reading a ticker tape) into the actual peptide toxin(s), which your immune system would see as a toxic invader and mount an immune response. In other words, such a "clot shot" is meant to get you sick, as is explained by Dr. David Martin and Dr. Judy Mikovits to Canadian Constitutional attorney Rocco Galati and Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. in the following video:
[VIDEO] 'Dr. David Martin tells us this is not a vaccine but rather a medical device.'
https://www.bitchute.com/video/ApnVWjiDdPeD/
Malone was 37 years old when the following 1996 U.S. patent 5,580,589 was issued; and, curiously, he has not spoken about his role in this research. He's listed next to last out of 5 researchers and, from what I remember when I was publishing in the 80s, next to last is a fairly prominent position on scientific articles...sort of like the Wuhan "bat woman" being listed immediately before UNC Chapel Hill's Ralph Baric on the 2015 Nature Medicine spike protein gain-of-funtion paper. I do not know whether the same holds true for patents.
U.S. Patent Office document: https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/6f/65/07/e39a6bf6d18e9d/US5580859.pdf
This potential can of worms was opened by Karen Kingston, who appears to have been somewhat miffed by something Malone said, as she implies in the following video:
March 13, 2023
FOREIGN U.S. Biolabs EXPOSED! Russian General Igor Kirillov Cites Karen Kingston & Stew Peters!
https://rumble.com/v2czuaa-foreign-u.s.-biolabs-exposed-russian-general-igor-kirillov-cites-karen-king.html
Kingston at time = 19:41: "Yeah. Well, when you brought forward, and Dr. (Bryan) Ardis brought forward that there were snake venom peptides in the spike protein, that was true; and, it was confirmed by scientists out of the University of Pittsburgh, Germany, the Cedars-Sinai in LA. And the lung samples of people who died out of Lombardi, Italy...Europe's ground zero; and, they found there was cobra venom peptides and krait venom peptides, as well as glycoprotein 120 ( Ed Paré Note: I couldn't understand the next 5 or 6 syllables) in the spike protein. So, it is true."
"Now, the other thing that probably Dr Malone wants people to say, you know he's saying, "that's a crazy conspiracy theory" (Paré Note: I assume Kingston means about the presence of venom in the people who died of the jabs), is because in his 1996 patent (5,580,859) for creating non-mammal DNA inside of mammals..inside of humans, him and his co-inventors used his cationic liposome lipidnanoparticle specifically to express toxic peptides, including cobra venom factor and ricin. So, it's in Dr. Malone's best interest; you know, if it was his idea and he patented the ability for this technology to convert human cells; because it also says you can use the mRNA to code cells in the tissue to produce the polypeptides for less than about 20 days and usually less than 10 days. So, he invented the technology that can convert human cells and program them to produce toxins such as cobra venom, it's in his best interest to call you and I a conspiracy theorist and discredit it; because that's his only chance at not being accused of being a biowarfare terrorist. He has to say what, everything that he's done, that he doesn't want people to know about, is a conspiracy theory. - Does that make sense?"
Peters: "Makes sense, yeah."
(Ed Paré Note: According to Dr. Bryan Ardis, various toxic venoms cause symptoms identical to the symptoms alleged to be indicative of the alleged Covid-19 illness, including loss of taste and smell. Additionally, Ardis states that PCR tests will report these toxic venom peptides as a positive result for "Covid-19" 100 percent of the time.)
Yes, he also admitted to the same on his first interview w/Eric Weinstein.
Good point. M. being on top of things and all, I wonder why He took the poison?