We do live in America and according to our Constitution we do have free speech. Breggin in entitled to his own opinion about Malone or anyone else he pleases as do all of us. Saying awful things about someone is not grounds for a defamation lawsuit. Breggin did not in anyway cause financial loss to Malone because of his comments and defamation is when you purposely told lies that you knew were lies in order to destroy someone. Breggin feels his statements about Malone are true. His book had nothing to do with the topic of Desmet's books or interviews. There was no competition because the books covered totally different topics. I do not believe Breggin was reading something into Desmet's theory that was not there. You did not pick up on it nor did you interpret it the way Breggin did but Breggin was not the only person that felt Desmet was off base. Breggin did not hurt Malone financially and Breggin did not knowingly tell lies about Malone. If Malone cannot take the heat then he needs to get out of the kitchen. Malone has a habit of attacking people that challenge him. He had George Webb (an invited journalist) removed from a conference in Atlanta because Webb was prepared to ask Malone about his involvement with DOMANE. Malone also has gone after Dr. Ruby and Stew Peters. I guess he is just going to sue everyone that says a mean thing about him. This appears to be a bullying tactic to stop people from saying things about Malone he doesn't like or to challenge some VERY questionable aspects of his career. You might have done the same??? And you would have lost your case just like Malone will lose his case.
How do you know Breggin didn't hurt Malone financially with the adverse comments he made about him? Neither you or I can say that for certain. If the lawsuit moves forward the evidence will show that.
Early on, Ruby and Peters sided with Breggin - their right - but if they publicly attacked me, I would probably be hostile toward them as well. Psychologically speaking, Malone is probably finding himself on the defensive a lot lately. What we do know for certain is that the adverse comments succeeded into dividing the public into two camps regarding Malone and Breggin, especially on social media. That in itself can have significant financial impact. IMO, if Malone and Breggin both put their egos aside and worked together, they could make a formidable team. Alas, the infighting among the truth warriors is, of course exactly what our enemies want - divide and conquer.
Malone is on video stating that he wasn't making any money, so how exactly did the Breggins cost him $25 million? Have you done ANY research on the Malones? You can't possibly be a researcher. George Webb and Housatonic.Live have the receipts on Malone and his mail order medical degreeЁЯШВЁЯШВthe guy says he's a physician but has never seen a patient. He's a bad joke.
And here you are piling on. Would you know if the Breggins, whose attack on Malone came out of nowhere, aren't controlled opposition? I don't have to do deep-dive research into a topic that others, like Dr. Meryl Nass have already completed. All you have to do is read it. But then, it likely won't fit into your paradigm and you'll either not read it, or if you do, you'll disregard it. That's how bias works and it is what it is.
Where's the personal attack? That you're not a researcher? Obviously you're not otherwise you'd know that Robert Malone is a monster who wanted to test Anthrax vaccines on kids. Meryl Nass fought him on that issue. You'd know that if you were a researcher.
The Breggins are honorable and ethical, they would never accept money to divide anyone. Nothing in their history would lead to such a horrible suggestion. Unlike Malone, they never suggested using our children as guinea pigs for big pharma.
I can see this point of view as well. To me though, we need to let this take its course and see how it plays out. So much that we donтАЩt know about this situation.
*Meryl
We do live in America and according to our Constitution we do have free speech. Breggin in entitled to his own opinion about Malone or anyone else he pleases as do all of us. Saying awful things about someone is not grounds for a defamation lawsuit. Breggin did not in anyway cause financial loss to Malone because of his comments and defamation is when you purposely told lies that you knew were lies in order to destroy someone. Breggin feels his statements about Malone are true. His book had nothing to do with the topic of Desmet's books or interviews. There was no competition because the books covered totally different topics. I do not believe Breggin was reading something into Desmet's theory that was not there. You did not pick up on it nor did you interpret it the way Breggin did but Breggin was not the only person that felt Desmet was off base. Breggin did not hurt Malone financially and Breggin did not knowingly tell lies about Malone. If Malone cannot take the heat then he needs to get out of the kitchen. Malone has a habit of attacking people that challenge him. He had George Webb (an invited journalist) removed from a conference in Atlanta because Webb was prepared to ask Malone about his involvement with DOMANE. Malone also has gone after Dr. Ruby and Stew Peters. I guess he is just going to sue everyone that says a mean thing about him. This appears to be a bullying tactic to stop people from saying things about Malone he doesn't like or to challenge some VERY questionable aspects of his career. You might have done the same??? And you would have lost your case just like Malone will lose his case.
How do you know Breggin didn't hurt Malone financially with the adverse comments he made about him? Neither you or I can say that for certain. If the lawsuit moves forward the evidence will show that.
Early on, Ruby and Peters sided with Breggin - their right - but if they publicly attacked me, I would probably be hostile toward them as well. Psychologically speaking, Malone is probably finding himself on the defensive a lot lately. What we do know for certain is that the adverse comments succeeded into dividing the public into two camps regarding Malone and Breggin, especially on social media. That in itself can have significant financial impact. IMO, if Malone and Breggin both put their egos aside and worked together, they could make a formidable team. Alas, the infighting among the truth warriors is, of course exactly what our enemies want - divide and conquer.
Malone is on video stating that he wasn't making any money, so how exactly did the Breggins cost him $25 million? Have you done ANY research on the Malones? You can't possibly be a researcher. George Webb and Housatonic.Live have the receipts on Malone and his mail order medical degreeЁЯШВЁЯШВthe guy says he's a physician but has never seen a patient. He's a bad joke.
And here you are piling on. Would you know if the Breggins, whose attack on Malone came out of nowhere, aren't controlled opposition? I don't have to do deep-dive research into a topic that others, like Dr. Meryl Nass have already completed. All you have to do is read it. But then, it likely won't fit into your paradigm and you'll either not read it, or if you do, you'll disregard it. That's how bias works and it is what it is.
And here's that personal attack..
Where's the personal attack? That you're not a researcher? Obviously you're not otherwise you'd know that Robert Malone is a monster who wanted to test Anthrax vaccines on kids. Meryl Nass fought him on that issue. You'd know that if you were a researcher.
Facts aren't attacks, grow up.
I would not be surprised
if someone didnтАЩt
get to some
of them with a bribe to a divide and conquer.
The Breggins are honorable and ethical, they would never accept money to divide anyone. Nothing in their history would lead to such a horrible suggestion. Unlike Malone, they never suggested using our children as guinea pigs for big pharma.
I can see this point of view as well. To me though, we need to let this take its course and see how it plays out. So much that we donтАЩt know about this situation.