With health, most people are very risk-adverse, so why would govts need to force people, directly and via proxy, to do or take something if they can prove it is safe, effective, necessary, and necessary?
How do they explain many jurisdictions which don't force people to wear masks?
With health, most people are very risk-adverse, so why would govts need to force people, directly and via proxy, to do or take something if they can prove it is safe, effective, necessary, and necessary?
How do they explain many jurisdictions which don't force people to wear masks?
With health, most people are very risk-adverse, so why would govts need to force people, directly and via proxy, to do or take something if they can prove it is safe, effective, necessary, and necessary?
How do they explain many jurisdictions which don't force people to wear masks?