Placed Sweden graph first for it shows the key message to you; FARR's law, virus has uptick, peak, downtick, thats how they behave, seasonal etc. upside, peak, downside
With health, most people are very risk-adverse, so why would govts need to force people, directly and via proxy, to do or take something if they can prove it is safe, effective, necessary, and necessary?
How do they explain many jurisdictions which don't force people to wear masks?
These graphs were done by Ian Miller, and I've mostly seen them separately. It's helpful to see so many of them together. He's done hundreds of these.
With health, most people are very risk-adverse, so why would govts need to force people, directly and via proxy, to do or take something if they can prove it is safe, effective, necessary, and necessary?
How do they explain many jurisdictions which don't force people to wear masks?