Nothing "wonky" about the Objective Hypocrisy Test
A Simple Logic Simple Integrity Exercise
If there's any crazy thinking, it is in the paradigm you are examining
Objective Systems Analysis my Profession, Economist. Not a WEF style Economist, just the math and logic.
The Most Empathy Model in any environment is an Opposite Sloping Regression Lines Model, to meet in the Golden Mean Middle, Least Amount of Objective Negatives to the Population.
Example covid19: Economics pays for food/housing/healthcare/education etc. Ergo Poor Economy = Deaths. Shutdowns have Costs, insurance, taxes, plant maintenance, etc. The proper model for covid19 was Shutdown Costs vs Shutdown Benefits, Opposite Sloping Regression Lines, Plotted Sum of the Least Squares, Least Amount of Objective Negatives to the Population. The Most Empathy Model Opposite Sloping Regression Lines is a Neutral Objective Course Model.
Psychology lacks the Most Empathy Model because Psychology's childhood is hopelessly damaged dissociated from objective sciences.
Psychology won't adopt the Most Empathy Model because Psychology simply accepts No Constructive Criticism.
Again before you can begin to understand the Observations of Psychology, you must understand the mind of Psychology.
Use the Objective Hypocrisy Test, Simple Logic Simple Integrity Exercise. Zero nonsense required.
If there's any "wonky" it's in the system you are examining
No need of any other nonsense word definitions
INTP is a series of 4 "black and white thinking" decisions when it is a spectrum - Psychology violating Own Rules used to Devalue others, while not being guilty. Sorry, No.
Again, before you can even begin to understand the Observations of Psychology, you must understand the psychology of Psychology. Use the Objective Hypocrisy Test.
To understand how someone thinks or not, examine the Rule System.
To judge character/integrity, hold own words and actions against Own Rules.
Simple Logic Simple Integrity Exercise, Universal. No "wonky".
E=MC^2 the observation conclusion of someone who understands relationships in the practical environment
Narcissist the observation conclusion of someone who lacks the Aptitude to do a science, more importantly Integrity to follow own rules.
The observation reveals the mind of the observer, more than what is being observed necessarily. That's extremely critical to understand.
Psychology is a constant and exponential own rule violation system. The negative bias against "black and white thinking" - Is in fact, "black and white thinking". Negative black and white thinking to be more exact. Just because someone understands binary doesn't mean they are a bad person, they could be.
Constant Exponential Own Rule Violations is Extreme Hypocrisy + whatever Rule System you are trying to impose on others. Simple Logic Simple Integrity, absolutely zero "wonk".
Hypocrites fail to meet own rules
People with integrity meet own rules
Leaders exceed standards
Once you understand the mind of Psychology, this will make sense - "Narcissist" is a word salad devalue word, in a control/devalue/abuse paradigm, motivated by profits/power/supply. "Narcissist" the psychological tool/label to make it easier to abuse another human being.
Word Salad Hypocrisy that only harms relationships, a natural and predictable result. I've seen this paradigm destroy relationships over generations and decades, and absolutely nothing can be done. It's the children who are harmed the most. The Narcissists running this business by own rules are profiting handsomely.
The entire paradigm needs an EXTERNAL AUDIT for Methodology/Integrity, but you know what they say about Narcs.
Then a rethink with objective sciences and own rules to clean up the paradigm. But that'll never happen.
Sunk Cost Syndrome + Narcissism Paradigm at Minimum
A bit wonky but the point is there.
Nothing "wonky" about the Objective Hypocrisy Test
A Simple Logic Simple Integrity Exercise
If there's any crazy thinking, it is in the paradigm you are examining
Objective Systems Analysis my Profession, Economist. Not a WEF style Economist, just the math and logic.
The Most Empathy Model in any environment is an Opposite Sloping Regression Lines Model, to meet in the Golden Mean Middle, Least Amount of Objective Negatives to the Population.
Example covid19: Economics pays for food/housing/healthcare/education etc. Ergo Poor Economy = Deaths. Shutdowns have Costs, insurance, taxes, plant maintenance, etc. The proper model for covid19 was Shutdown Costs vs Shutdown Benefits, Opposite Sloping Regression Lines, Plotted Sum of the Least Squares, Least Amount of Objective Negatives to the Population. The Most Empathy Model Opposite Sloping Regression Lines is a Neutral Objective Course Model.
Psychology lacks the Most Empathy Model because Psychology's childhood is hopelessly damaged dissociated from objective sciences.
Psychology won't adopt the Most Empathy Model because Psychology simply accepts No Constructive Criticism.
Again before you can begin to understand the Observations of Psychology, you must understand the mind of Psychology.
Use the Objective Hypocrisy Test, Simple Logic Simple Integrity Exercise. Zero nonsense required.
As I said, wonky:
characteristic of, relating to, or suggestive of a wonk: such as
a preoccupation with arcane details or procedures in a specialized field
In other words, a bit unintelligible for the non-INTPs among us. But good.
As I said, Objective Hypocrisy Test -
If there's any "wonky" it's in the system you are examining
No need of any other nonsense word definitions
INTP is a series of 4 "black and white thinking" decisions when it is a spectrum - Psychology violating Own Rules used to Devalue others, while not being guilty. Sorry, No.
Again, before you can even begin to understand the Observations of Psychology, you must understand the psychology of Psychology. Use the Objective Hypocrisy Test.
To understand how someone thinks or not, examine the Rule System.
To judge character/integrity, hold own words and actions against Own Rules.
Simple Logic Simple Integrity Exercise, Universal. No "wonky".
E=MC^2 the observation conclusion of someone who understands relationships in the practical environment
Narcissist the observation conclusion of someone who lacks the Aptitude to do a science, more importantly Integrity to follow own rules.
The observation reveals the mind of the observer, more than what is being observed necessarily. That's extremely critical to understand.
Psychology is a constant and exponential own rule violation system. The negative bias against "black and white thinking" - Is in fact, "black and white thinking". Negative black and white thinking to be more exact. Just because someone understands binary doesn't mean they are a bad person, they could be.
Constant Exponential Own Rule Violations is Extreme Hypocrisy + whatever Rule System you are trying to impose on others. Simple Logic Simple Integrity, absolutely zero "wonk".
Hypocrites fail to meet own rules
People with integrity meet own rules
Leaders exceed standards
Once you understand the mind of Psychology, this will make sense - "Narcissist" is a word salad devalue word, in a control/devalue/abuse paradigm, motivated by profits/power/supply. "Narcissist" the psychological tool/label to make it easier to abuse another human being.
Word Salad Hypocrisy that only harms relationships, a natural and predictable result. I've seen this paradigm destroy relationships over generations and decades, and absolutely nothing can be done. It's the children who are harmed the most. The Narcissists running this business by own rules are profiting handsomely.
The entire paradigm needs an EXTERNAL AUDIT for Methodology/Integrity, but you know what they say about Narcs.
Then a rethink with objective sciences and own rules to clean up the paradigm. But that'll never happen.
Sunk Cost Syndrome + Narcissism Paradigm at Minimum