OK, but how can you exonerate anyone who made such a decision based on MATTHEW PERRY'S say-so (is this a case of *relative* dumb-assedness? if so, theirs would be greater), and fail to exonerate him for the same decision based on the medical advice of EVERY authority getting any press/publication at that wretched and god-forsaken time, a…
OK, but how can you exonerate anyone who made such a decision based on MATTHEW PERRY'S say-so (is this a case of *relative* dumb-assedness? if so, theirs would be greater), and fail to exonerate him for the same decision based on the medical advice of EVERY authority getting any press/publication at that wretched and god-forsaken time, and even virtually all of the g.d. "primary care providers?" Remember what it was like then? I don't see any indication he was operating in anything but good (and completely misplaced) faith, unlike s o - o - o many, who actually knew the truth. He was a television actor, not a smart guy or critical thinker.
OK, but how can you exonerate anyone who made such a decision based on MATTHEW PERRY'S say-so (is this a case of *relative* dumb-assedness? if so, theirs would be greater), and fail to exonerate him for the same decision based on the medical advice of EVERY authority getting any press/publication at that wretched and god-forsaken time, and even virtually all of the g.d. "primary care providers?" Remember what it was like then? I don't see any indication he was operating in anything but good (and completely misplaced) faith, unlike s o - o - o many, who actually knew the truth. He was a television actor, not a smart guy or critical thinker.
Give your head a wobble, the money grabbing bastard was no doubt paid vast amounts of blood money to promote the murder weapon to empty headed fans!