Thanks for replying. I've seen your subsequent post above with your explanation so your reasons are clear.
I am not taking sides but merely giving my observation from an independent perspective and someone who has experience in dispute resolution.
In life, it is virtually impossible to find a single other person with identical opinions and fully aligned principles. Even so, it is possible to amicably co-exist with others even though there may be disagreements. All that is required is mutual respect for each to have their own opinion (which may be different). A difference of opinion on one (or even a few topics) should not lead to a relationship ending.
I hope you don't mind me sharing my thoughts but feel free to ignore them if you wish!
I can only imagine you have not been closely following Dr. Alexander’s evolution of worldviews since the beginning of the so-called pandemic until now.
Am I right?
In any case, just as I have explained above, Dr. Alexander’s inconsistencies are frustrating to his followers, including me. I don’t expect to agree on everything with anyone, including Dr. Alexander. Quite the contrary. As far as I can decipher, I likely stand alone on the issue of virus existence and contagion. To me the current viral model is clearly broken, and yet there is enough evidence for contagion. In other words, we clearly don’t understand microbiology and immunology, likely because we don’t understand the subatomic world governing life…IMV…
BTW: What’s your experience in dispute resolutions? Is that a profession or a gift?
You are correct. I've not been following (closely or otherwise) Dr. Alexander. In fact, I only discovered his Substack very recently.
In answer to your question about dispute resolution, it's a profession but I also use the fundamental principles for resolving disputes (outwith my specialised field) on a non-professional basis.
I should have but then my Substack app wasn’t working and then I forgot as I was watching hockey…
Thanks for replying. I've seen your subsequent post above with your explanation so your reasons are clear.
I am not taking sides but merely giving my observation from an independent perspective and someone who has experience in dispute resolution.
In life, it is virtually impossible to find a single other person with identical opinions and fully aligned principles. Even so, it is possible to amicably co-exist with others even though there may be disagreements. All that is required is mutual respect for each to have their own opinion (which may be different). A difference of opinion on one (or even a few topics) should not lead to a relationship ending.
I hope you don't mind me sharing my thoughts but feel free to ignore them if you wish!
Thanks for sharing your thoughts.
I can only imagine you have not been closely following Dr. Alexander’s evolution of worldviews since the beginning of the so-called pandemic until now.
Am I right?
In any case, just as I have explained above, Dr. Alexander’s inconsistencies are frustrating to his followers, including me. I don’t expect to agree on everything with anyone, including Dr. Alexander. Quite the contrary. As far as I can decipher, I likely stand alone on the issue of virus existence and contagion. To me the current viral model is clearly broken, and yet there is enough evidence for contagion. In other words, we clearly don’t understand microbiology and immunology, likely because we don’t understand the subatomic world governing life…IMV…
BTW: What’s your experience in dispute resolutions? Is that a profession or a gift?
You are correct. I've not been following (closely or otherwise) Dr. Alexander. In fact, I only discovered his Substack very recently.
In answer to your question about dispute resolution, it's a profession but I also use the fundamental principles for resolving disputes (outwith my specialised field) on a non-professional basis.