modelled) is IMO robust enough to stand scientific scrutiny & raises AGAIN, serious questions about the harms & deaths from Malone, Bourla, Bancel, Sahin, Weissman et al. mRNA vaccine; Joel Smalley
The reason behind my frustrations with you are your inconsistencies. I have a feeling others have the same issue…
I’ve tried to defend you on one of your posts but now I’ve realized now it wasn’t worth it.
But, we all have free will…
My main issue is your blind support for McCullough. I’m not sure if you have realized this but most, if not all, that McCullough does it about him. Have you noticed it?
One doesn’t have to be a psychiatrist, or a psychologist, to realize that the pandemic, which we both agree was staged, was the best thing that has ever happened to McCullough - for the attention reasons. His attention seeking behavior is no longer comical. It is on the border of an illness. “I am the most cited doctor in this paper and I am the most published doctor there … McCullough protocol is this…” and unless there are no more pandemics, his attention seeking behavior will continue, no doubt about that.
I also realize that McCullough is not the only doctor, or “pandemic personality”, who has parachuted into stardom because of the staged pandemic. Some of them are so confident in their public statements that it is no longer funny… It is dangerously sickening. I refer to this attitude as god-like arrogance…
There are many who wish the pandemics continue, or they will have to crawl back to their monotonous lives from before the fake pandemic.
What do you think McCullough is going to do if the next fake pandemic is staged? Is he going to be with you on it? Or, is he going to go along?
You can already guess what my bet is…
I already know that sooner or later you will have no choice but to choose one side. You are an intelligent guy, so I know you know what I’m talking about…Sitting on the fence will get you shot from both sides…if it is not happened already as my comment clearly has identified at least some issues…
Thanks for replying. I've seen your subsequent post above with your explanation so your reasons are clear.
I am not taking sides but merely giving my observation from an independent perspective and someone who has experience in dispute resolution.
In life, it is virtually impossible to find a single other person with identical opinions and fully aligned principles. Even so, it is possible to amicably co-exist with others even though there may be disagreements. All that is required is mutual respect for each to have their own opinion (which may be different). A difference of opinion on one (or even a few topics) should not lead to a relationship ending.
I hope you don't mind me sharing my thoughts but feel free to ignore them if you wish!
I can only imagine you have not been closely following Dr. Alexander’s evolution of worldviews since the beginning of the so-called pandemic until now.
Am I right?
In any case, just as I have explained above, Dr. Alexander’s inconsistencies are frustrating to his followers, including me. I don’t expect to agree on everything with anyone, including Dr. Alexander. Quite the contrary. As far as I can decipher, I likely stand alone on the issue of virus existence and contagion. To me the current viral model is clearly broken, and yet there is enough evidence for contagion. In other words, we clearly don’t understand microbiology and immunology, likely because we don’t understand the subatomic world governing life…IMV…
BTW: What’s your experience in dispute resolutions? Is that a profession or a gift?
You are correct. I've not been following (closely or otherwise) Dr. Alexander. In fact, I only discovered his Substack very recently.
In answer to your question about dispute resolution, it's a profession but I also use the fundamental principles for resolving disputes (outwith my specialised field) on a non-professional basis.
I have not choice but to unsubscribe…
did not need say it, just unsubscribe, thank you for partaking and you are always welcomed
The reason behind my frustrations with you are your inconsistencies. I have a feeling others have the same issue…
I’ve tried to defend you on one of your posts but now I’ve realized now it wasn’t worth it.
But, we all have free will…
My main issue is your blind support for McCullough. I’m not sure if you have realized this but most, if not all, that McCullough does it about him. Have you noticed it?
One doesn’t have to be a psychiatrist, or a psychologist, to realize that the pandemic, which we both agree was staged, was the best thing that has ever happened to McCullough - for the attention reasons. His attention seeking behavior is no longer comical. It is on the border of an illness. “I am the most cited doctor in this paper and I am the most published doctor there … McCullough protocol is this…” and unless there are no more pandemics, his attention seeking behavior will continue, no doubt about that.
I also realize that McCullough is not the only doctor, or “pandemic personality”, who has parachuted into stardom because of the staged pandemic. Some of them are so confident in their public statements that it is no longer funny… It is dangerously sickening. I refer to this attitude as god-like arrogance…
There are many who wish the pandemics continue, or they will have to crawl back to their monotonous lives from before the fake pandemic.
What do you think McCullough is going to do if the next fake pandemic is staged? Is he going to be with you on it? Or, is he going to go along?
You can already guess what my bet is…
I already know that sooner or later you will have no choice but to choose one side. You are an intelligent guy, so I know you know what I’m talking about…Sitting on the fence will get you shot from both sides…if it is not happened already as my comment clearly has identified at least some issues…
Be well,
Tomas
You are right. Sorry
ok
I'm intrigued to know because you did not give a reason. Could you please explain your reason(s) why you had no choice but to unsubscribe please?
I should have but then my Substack app wasn’t working and then I forgot as I was watching hockey…
Thanks for replying. I've seen your subsequent post above with your explanation so your reasons are clear.
I am not taking sides but merely giving my observation from an independent perspective and someone who has experience in dispute resolution.
In life, it is virtually impossible to find a single other person with identical opinions and fully aligned principles. Even so, it is possible to amicably co-exist with others even though there may be disagreements. All that is required is mutual respect for each to have their own opinion (which may be different). A difference of opinion on one (or even a few topics) should not lead to a relationship ending.
I hope you don't mind me sharing my thoughts but feel free to ignore them if you wish!
Thanks for sharing your thoughts.
I can only imagine you have not been closely following Dr. Alexander’s evolution of worldviews since the beginning of the so-called pandemic until now.
Am I right?
In any case, just as I have explained above, Dr. Alexander’s inconsistencies are frustrating to his followers, including me. I don’t expect to agree on everything with anyone, including Dr. Alexander. Quite the contrary. As far as I can decipher, I likely stand alone on the issue of virus existence and contagion. To me the current viral model is clearly broken, and yet there is enough evidence for contagion. In other words, we clearly don’t understand microbiology and immunology, likely because we don’t understand the subatomic world governing life…IMV…
BTW: What’s your experience in dispute resolutions? Is that a profession or a gift?
You are correct. I've not been following (closely or otherwise) Dr. Alexander. In fact, I only discovered his Substack very recently.
In answer to your question about dispute resolution, it's a profession but I also use the fundamental principles for resolving disputes (outwith my specialised field) on a non-professional basis.