Moderna halts mRNA Epstein-Barr vaccine clinical trial? Why? Seems myocarditis has emerged & a hard stop is implemented? Why then with all the COVID deaths are the mRNA vaccines still under EAU?
Moderna halts mRNA Epstein-Barr vaccine clinical trial? Why? Seems myocarditis has emerged & a hard stop is implemented? Why then with all the COVID deaths are the mRNA vaccines still under EAU?
Nice reporting by Berenson, thansk for alerting us! occurred in a Phase 1 trial of Moderna's jab for the Epstein-Barr virus & will only add to the concerns around mRNA biotechnology and heart issues
Because ANY product that relies on using cell transfection reagents to infect healthy cells with viral genes will unavoidably result in those compromised cells signaling a viral invasion and triggering innate immune inflammatory attacks by the innate immune system on the tissues containing those compromised cells.
Love it... I got Epstein Barr from two Moderna toxic lots, so now they want to “vaccinate” to stop the illness they are causing. Brilliant marketing strategy.
Conficting ethics confuse and diffuse consumers perception. Ie psych op. Plus investors will likely release the product when a need is prepositioned above risk. Risk and adverse effects are controlled ie hidden and ignored.
A few observations about this - assuming it's true (wasn't Berenson pro-vaxx?)
All the same:
1. Is Esptein-Barr not a side effect of the covid mRNA poison shot - if so, they have a ready made market. Pfizer bought a cancer treatment drug producing biotechnology company a few years ago to nicely mop up all shot caused cancer.
2. Moderna is visibly showing off their high safety standards - implying likewise for their covid shot development simply to silence detractors.
3. The email is most likely a fake - Berenson's source is most likely some substack teenage boy traveling under a pseudonym with a well developed black comedy sense of humour.
4. All the "I told you so" Naomi Wolf type substack adherents just bust their collective nut - HARD.
The deadly mRNA-platform "vaccine" concept should be scrapped once and for all.
Why doesn't Moderna develop a vaccine for Guillain-Barre instead of Epstein-Barr?
Perhaps because Big Pharma has already developed some vaccine(s) to cause G-B.
As Judy Mikovits stated... "NEVER take another vaccine of Any kind!"
Because ANY product that relies on using cell transfection reagents to infect healthy cells with viral genes will unavoidably result in those compromised cells signaling a viral invasion and triggering innate immune inflammatory attacks by the innate immune system on the tissues containing those compromised cells.
Love it... I got Epstein Barr from two Moderna toxic lots, so now they want to “vaccinate” to stop the illness they are causing. Brilliant marketing strategy.
Conficting ethics confuse and diffuse consumers perception. Ie psych op. Plus investors will likely release the product when a need is prepositioned above risk. Risk and adverse effects are controlled ie hidden and ignored.
A few observations about this - assuming it's true (wasn't Berenson pro-vaxx?)
All the same:
1. Is Esptein-Barr not a side effect of the covid mRNA poison shot - if so, they have a ready made market. Pfizer bought a cancer treatment drug producing biotechnology company a few years ago to nicely mop up all shot caused cancer.
2. Moderna is visibly showing off their high safety standards - implying likewise for their covid shot development simply to silence detractors.
3. The email is most likely a fake - Berenson's source is most likely some substack teenage boy traveling under a pseudonym with a well developed black comedy sense of humour.
4. All the "I told you so" Naomi Wolf type substack adherents just bust their collective nut - HARD.
Nobody can get it. Infants and toddlers grow up to teenagers.