More compelling evidence that mRNA technology mRNA vaccines (Bancel Bourla Sahin Weissman Kariko Malone Tureci et al.) cause cancer: 'N1-methyl-pseudouridine (m1Ψ): Friend or foe of cancer'; YES
More compelling evidence that mRNA technology mRNA vaccines (Bancel Bourla Sahin Weissman Kariko Malone Tureci et al.) cause cancer: 'N1-methyl-pseudouridine (m1Ψ): Friend or foe of cancer'; YES
Alberto Rubio-Casillas et al. finds clinical trials for cancers or infectious diseases should not use mRNA vaccines, no modifications etc.; these are non-sterilizing vaccines, do not stop infection..
Animal trials of these new mRNA vaccines are needed. Trial them on donkeys, especially the trojan-elephants that are actually donkeys. Trial them on Mike Johnson, Paul Ryan, Eyepatch McCain (Dan Crenshaw), Adam Kinzinger, Elise Stefanik, Liz Cheney, Nikki Haley etc.
this is so funny but you are so right...seriously these mRNA products need 100 years of dish and animal research and 100 years of ethical debate...they need to go away and do not return for 100 years, let us see that data
What we should be concentrating on right now is the WHO and how they plan to take over the world in a month from now. We will need good doctors and nurses in our areas to help us, the mainstream ones have sold their souls to the devil and are no good to us. Can we talk about that instead of this for now.
According to J Roguski (who appears to have done a 180), the WHO negotiations could well be a red herring. They do not overtake Sovereignty of the Nations; therefore, we should concentrate on the National Laws that allowed them to do what they did last time.
Roguski took a lot of heat for exactly this; the WHO negotiations have done the 180... and as THEY expected, nobody noticed a thing. Roguski says he 'got lucky' - found the updated docs which as of March have taken great care to enable the PERCEPTION that there will be NO WHO testing mandates 'next time' around - instead - and this is the key element, the nation states will have the 'right' to impose controls, eg., testing, quarantine and... wait for it...
"Invasive medical examination, vaccination or other prophylaxis shall not be required as a condition of entry of any traveller to the territory of a State Party, except that, subject to Articles 32, 42 and 45, these Regulations do not preclude States Parties from requiring medical examination, vaccination or other prophylaxis or proof of vaccination or other prophylaxis"
180 indeed. 180+666 perhaps!
Total clean bill of 'civil liberties health'... for the WHO et al., TOTAL authorization of the FULL abrogation of ALL civil liberties by any such STATE as desires to impose QUARANTINE and FORCED VACCINATION ... on any traveler caught in their net.
Stop and think for a moment about that - any STATE can preclude the civil rights of any person entering their borders. The WEF's roster of YOUNG LEADERS - aka medical fascism seeders - has and will have full carte blanc to forcibly remove you to internment if you are inside their border next 'outbreak' ... and subject you to DEATH jabbery UNTIL YOU ARE 'FIXED.'
James is nonplussed that folks are not seeing this for what it is. And it will indeed mean the end of international travel - if you're not OK WITH forced vaccination and lockdown.
Next up: the gallery can debate the topic of TRUMP as the white knight savior - "he'll refuse any attempt to impose that silliness here!" - or - "he'll do exactly what he's told to, like he did last time!"
You be da judge. Keeping in mind, of course, that the guy already folded on abortion.
The Supreme Court overturned the unconstitutional decision that burdened America since 1972. Abortion was never a "right". And it was always a State issue, not a Federal issue.
It can never be a federal law, never a federal mandate, for or against. It has been used as a red herring in Congress recently, to pretend to be an issue between Republicans and Democrats, pushed by RINOs like Graham. The UniParty tried to make it an issue, so the Dems could use it as a campaign issue.
Trump made a move that totally destroyed the Dems ability to use it as an issue. He is correct in saying it's a state issue, and if a state is evil enough to allow murdering children, then it is on them. And if a state passes laws that protect the unborn, then that is also on them and their citizens, and they will be blessed.
I did not wish to create a 'red herring' to the issue at hand here by writing that. However, the attempted defence of the Don you provide 'resonates' with startling accord - to the manner in which the WHO et al are saying one thing(for public consumption) and doing another(behind closed doors - where the real power is.) So, to set the record straight...
On the Monday immediately before the ruling, Trump said he 'supported state's rights on abortion.' Then, when the Arizona courts rules state law protecting babies from abortions is valid, he says they 'went too far,' and that "the governor and everybody else have got to bring it back into reason and that it will be taken care of I think.”
We have no need to discuss the federal scope - or lack thereof - on this issue. At the first chance to signal where he 'stands' on an issue of paramount importance to his "base," the guy spoke words which actually 'signal' to the folks who really matter what THEY want to hear so everybody knows he is still 'on reservation.'
Roduski sums the whole political charade up magnificently in the interview here - https://www.brighteon.com/19b43d38-a4b6-458f-a315-000e6c89e22e - whether it's the WHO ... or the DON, it's all about creating the appearance of taking one position, in order to proceed with actuating it's opposite.
It's a fait accompli. The Japanese are not as docile as Americans and are resisting but most of the West is going to bend over for the WHO and let it have its way. Nothing can stop it. The only thing can reverse it is if Trump is elected.
Animal trials of these new mRNA vaccines are needed. Trial them on donkeys, especially the trojan-elephants that are actually donkeys. Trial them on Mike Johnson, Paul Ryan, Eyepatch McCain (Dan Crenshaw), Adam Kinzinger, Elise Stefanik, Liz Cheney, Nikki Haley etc.
nice....I love this
Oh yes, especially Cheney, Kinzinger, Ryan and Crenshaw. "eyepatch McCain", lol.
this is so funny but you are so right...seriously these mRNA products need 100 years of dish and animal research and 100 years of ethical debate...they need to go away and do not return for 100 years, let us see that data
What we should be concentrating on right now is the WHO and how they plan to take over the world in a month from now. We will need good doctors and nurses in our areas to help us, the mainstream ones have sold their souls to the devil and are no good to us. Can we talk about that instead of this for now.
yes
yes, yes, very good point
According to J Roguski (who appears to have done a 180), the WHO negotiations could well be a red herring. They do not overtake Sovereignty of the Nations; therefore, we should concentrate on the National Laws that allowed them to do what they did last time.
in way too you are right...a lot of this is fear mongering...e.g. this will never fly in US.
Roguski took a lot of heat for exactly this; the WHO negotiations have done the 180... and as THEY expected, nobody noticed a thing. Roguski says he 'got lucky' - found the updated docs which as of March have taken great care to enable the PERCEPTION that there will be NO WHO testing mandates 'next time' around - instead - and this is the key element, the nation states will have the 'right' to impose controls, eg., testing, quarantine and... wait for it...
"Invasive medical examination, vaccination or other prophylaxis shall not be required as a condition of entry of any traveller to the territory of a State Party, except that, subject to Articles 32, 42 and 45, these Regulations do not preclude States Parties from requiring medical examination, vaccination or other prophylaxis or proof of vaccination or other prophylaxis"
180 indeed. 180+666 perhaps!
Total clean bill of 'civil liberties health'... for the WHO et al., TOTAL authorization of the FULL abrogation of ALL civil liberties by any such STATE as desires to impose QUARANTINE and FORCED VACCINATION ... on any traveler caught in their net.
Stop and think for a moment about that - any STATE can preclude the civil rights of any person entering their borders. The WEF's roster of YOUNG LEADERS - aka medical fascism seeders - has and will have full carte blanc to forcibly remove you to internment if you are inside their border next 'outbreak' ... and subject you to DEATH jabbery UNTIL YOU ARE 'FIXED.'
James is nonplussed that folks are not seeing this for what it is. And it will indeed mean the end of international travel - if you're not OK WITH forced vaccination and lockdown.
Next up: the gallery can debate the topic of TRUMP as the white knight savior - "he'll refuse any attempt to impose that silliness here!" - or - "he'll do exactly what he's told to, like he did last time!"
You be da judge. Keeping in mind, of course, that the guy already folded on abortion.
The Supreme Court overturned the unconstitutional decision that burdened America since 1972. Abortion was never a "right". And it was always a State issue, not a Federal issue.
It can never be a federal law, never a federal mandate, for or against. It has been used as a red herring in Congress recently, to pretend to be an issue between Republicans and Democrats, pushed by RINOs like Graham. The UniParty tried to make it an issue, so the Dems could use it as a campaign issue.
Trump made a move that totally destroyed the Dems ability to use it as an issue. He is correct in saying it's a state issue, and if a state is evil enough to allow murdering children, then it is on them. And if a state passes laws that protect the unborn, then that is also on them and their citizens, and they will be blessed.
Trump did NOT "fold" on the issue.
I did not wish to create a 'red herring' to the issue at hand here by writing that. However, the attempted defence of the Don you provide 'resonates' with startling accord - to the manner in which the WHO et al are saying one thing(for public consumption) and doing another(behind closed doors - where the real power is.) So, to set the record straight...
On the Monday immediately before the ruling, Trump said he 'supported state's rights on abortion.' Then, when the Arizona courts rules state law protecting babies from abortions is valid, he says they 'went too far,' and that "the governor and everybody else have got to bring it back into reason and that it will be taken care of I think.”
We have no need to discuss the federal scope - or lack thereof - on this issue. At the first chance to signal where he 'stands' on an issue of paramount importance to his "base," the guy spoke words which actually 'signal' to the folks who really matter what THEY want to hear so everybody knows he is still 'on reservation.'
Roduski sums the whole political charade up magnificently in the interview here - https://www.brighteon.com/19b43d38-a4b6-458f-a315-000e6c89e22e - whether it's the WHO ... or the DON, it's all about creating the appearance of taking one position, in order to proceed with actuating it's opposite.
Send delegations to Davos and Beijing to lobby to change the US and Canadian laws?
It's a fait accompli. The Japanese are not as docile as Americans and are resisting but most of the West is going to bend over for the WHO and let it have its way. Nothing can stop it. The only thing can reverse it is if Trump is elected.
boom...US aka Trump will not accept this.
Paul, did you read about the new variant called Tumbleweed? They expect 100 million to be dead by Tuesday.
Sage Hana satire.
ha ha ha, I will take a look